Literature DB >> 16564786

Lack of value of repeat stool testing for Clostridium difficile toxin.

Sowjanya S Mohan1, Brian P McDermott, Subha Parchuri, Burke A Cunha.   

Abstract

Twenty years ago, Clostridium difficile was first established as a cause of pseudomembranous colitis and antibiotic-associated diarrhea.C. difficile diarrhea is a widely recognized problem in the inpatient setting, with potentially significant morbidity and mortality. Antibiotics, and some chemotherapy agents, can potentially cause C. difficile colitis/diarrhea. The most commonly implicated agents are ampicillin, clindamycin, and cephalosporins. Diarrhea during antibiotic therapy is common and may be caused by C. difficile. Testing for C. difficile differentiates diarrheas into C. difficile positive and C. difficile negative. C. difficile can be carried asymptomatically as normal gastrointestinal flora, and in adults who have received antibiotic therapy, carrier states can be as high as 46%. Hospitalized patients are often colonized with C. difficile. C. difficile produces 3 virulence factors: an enterotoxin (toxin A), a cytotoxin (toxin B), and a substance to inhibit bowel motility. Different tests can be used to detect these toxins. The most widely used test is the enzyme immunoassay (EIA) for toxin A, toxin B, or both. The EIA C. difficile toxin assay has sensitivity and specificity ranges of 50% to 90% and 70% to 95%, respectively. Diagnostically, C. difficile cell culture cytotoxin assay remains the gold standard with sensitivity and specificity of 93% and 89%, respectively. Because of lack of confidence of the EIA for C. difficile, some clinicians assume an initial negative result may represent a false-negative test, and repeat testing is often done. We evaluated the value of repeat stool testing for C. difficile toxin A and B by EIA in inpatients with nosocomial diarrhea on antibiotics.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16564786     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2005.08.026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Med        ISSN: 0002-9343            Impact factor:   4.965


  22 in total

Review 1.  Epidemiology, pathogenesis, and management of Clostridium difficile infection.

Authors:  Rajaraman Durai
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2007-04-03       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 2.  Clinical update for the diagnosis and treatment of Clostridium difficile infection.

Authors:  Edward C Oldfield; Edward C Oldfield; David A Johnson
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2014-02-06

3.  Rapid stool-based diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection by real-time PCR in a children's hospital.

Authors:  Ruth Ann Luna; Bobby L Boyanton; Seema Mehta; Ebony M Courtney; C Renee Webb; Paula A Revell; James Versalovic
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2011-01-05       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Clostridium difficile: Changing Epidemiology, Treatment and Infection Prevention Measures.

Authors:  Jane A Cecil
Journal:  Curr Infect Dis Rep       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 3.725

5.  Is repeat PCR needed for diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection?

Authors:  Robert F Luo; Niaz Banaei
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2010-08-04       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Impact of an electronic hard-stop clinical decision support tool to limit repeat Clostridioides difficile toxin enzyme immunoassay testing on test utilization.

Authors:  Jennie H Kwon; Kimberly A Reske; Tiffany Hink; Ronald Jackups; Carey-Ann D Burnham; Erik R Dubberke
Journal:  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol       Date:  2019-10-24       Impact factor: 3.254

7.  Nonutility of repeat laboratory testing for detection of Clostridium difficile by use of PCR or enzyme immunoassay.

Authors:  Elisabeth Aichinger; Cathy D Schleck; William S Harmsen; Lisa M Nyre; Robin Patel
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2008-09-10       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Evaluation of tcdB real-time PCR in a three-step diagnostic algorithm for detection of toxigenic Clostridium difficile.

Authors:  Ann M Larson; Angela M Fung; Ferric C Fang
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2009-11-18       Impact factor: 5.948

9.  Yield of stool culture with isolate toxin testing versus a two-step algorithm including stool toxin testing for detection of toxigenic Clostridium difficile.

Authors:  Megan E Reller; Clara A Lema; Trish M Perl; Mian Cai; Tracy L Ross; Kathleen A Speck; Karen C Carroll
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2007-09-05       Impact factor: 5.948

10.  Identification of a pseudo-outbreak of Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) and the effect of repeated testing, sensitivity, and specificity on perceived prevalence of CDI.

Authors:  Marina Litvin; Kimberly A Reske; Jennie Mayfield; Kathleen M McMullen; Peter Georgantopoulos; Susan Copper; Joan E Hoppe-Bauer; Victoria J Fraser; David K Warren; Erik R Dubberke
Journal:  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 3.254

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.