Literature DB >> 16556567

The effect of interference in the early processing stages on response inhibition in the stop signal task.

Frederick Verbruggen1, Baptist Liefooghe, André Vandierendonck.   

Abstract

In the present study, the relation between interference at the early processing stages and response inhibition was investigated. In previous studies, response stopping appeared to be slowed down when irrelevant distracting information was presented. The purpose of the present study was to further explore the relationship between interference control and response inhibition. In Experiment 1, a stop signal paradigm was combined with a global/local task. The typical global-to-local interference effect is generally attributed to early processing stages, such as stimulus perception and identification. Results of this experiment demonstrated a congruency effect for both reaction time data and stopping performance. In Experiment 2, these results were replicated with a flanker task that used stimulus-incongruent but response-congruent flankers. Results of both experiments suggest that response inhibition and interference at the early processing stages interact.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16556567     DOI: 10.1080/17470210500151386

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)        ISSN: 1747-0218            Impact factor:   2.143


  19 in total

1.  Functional parcellation of the inferior frontal and midcingulate cortices in a flanker-stop-change paradigm.

Authors:  Stefanie Enriquez-Geppert; Tom Eichele; Karsten Specht; Harald Kugel; Christo Pantev; René J Huster
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2012-03-16       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Supplementary motor area exerts proactive and reactive control of arm movements.

Authors:  Xiaomo Chen; Katherine Wilson Scangos; Veit Stuphorn
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-11-03       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Investigating the role of conflict resolution in memory updating by means of the one-back choice RT task.

Authors:  Arnaud Szmalec; Jelle Demanet; André Vandierendonck; Frederick Verbruggen
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2008-04-24

4.  Role of supplementary eye field in saccade initiation: executive, not direct, control.

Authors:  Veit Stuphorn; Joshua W Brown; Jeffrey D Schall
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-11-25       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Exploring relations between task conflict and informational conflict in the Stroop task.

Authors:  Olga Entel; Joseph Tzelgov; Yoella Bereby-Meyer; Nitzan Shahar
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2014-11-25

6.  On the dependence of response inhibition processes on sensory modality.

Authors:  Benjamin Bodmer; Christian Beste
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2017-01-03       Impact factor: 5.038

7.  Proactive control of sequential saccades in the human supplementary eye field.

Authors:  K M Sharika; Sebastiaan F W Neggers; Tjerk P Gutteling; Stefan Van der Stigchel; H Chris Dijkerman; Aditya Murthy
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-03-14       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Attentional bias on motor control: is motor inhibition influenced by attentional reorienting?

Authors:  Pauline M Hilt; Pasquale Cardellicchio
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2018-03-08

9.  Proactive inhibitory control and attractor dynamics in countermanding action: a spiking neural circuit model.

Authors:  Chung-Chuan Lo; Leanne Boucher; Martin Paré; Jeffrey D Schall; Xiao-Jing Wang
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-07-15       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 10.  Models of response inhibition in the stop-signal and stop-change paradigms.

Authors:  Frederick Verbruggen; Gordon D Logan
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2008-09-04       Impact factor: 8.989

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.