Literature DB >> 15521938

Long-term follow-up of dynamic graciloplasty for faecal incontinence.

M J Thornton1, M L Kennedy, D Z Lubowski, D W King.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This paper presents the long-term morbidity, function and quality of life data for patients who have undergone dynamic graciloplasty (DGP) for faecal incontinence. PATIENTS AND METHODS: All patients (n = 38) who had undergone DGP at one institution between 1993 and 2003 are presented. Thirty-three were available for long-term follow-up (median 60 months) and completed a telephone questionnaire assessing quality of life (QOL), bowel and sexual function and patient satisfaction. All patients had interval anorectal physiology studies.
RESULTS: At a median follow-up of 5 years, 72% had pain, swelling or paraesthesia in the donor leg and 27% had sexual dysfunction. Sixteen percent of patients had been converted to an end-colostomy for persisting incontinence and 11% for obstructed defaecation. All other patients have a normally functioning graciloplasty. Sixteen percent of patients reported a faecal continence score < 12. Of those patients with a functioning graciloplasty, 50% had obstructed defaecation and 64% reported that their bowel dysfunction had a negative impacted on their QOL. Age, medical comorbidity and anal manometry did not correlate with functional outcome. Quality of life scores and patient satisfaction scores correlated significantly with continence scores. There was a trend toward higher QOL and satisfaction scores with conversion to colostomy compared with a continence score > 12. Sixty percent of patients rated their satisfaction with DGP as 50% or better on a visual analogue scale, and this correlated strongly with the continence score at the time of the assessment (P < 0.001).
CONCLUSION: Dynamic graciloplasty significantly improves patient quality of life and anal continence for some patients. Despite increased experience, morbidity remains high and long-term continence scores are poor in a majority of cases. Obstructed defaecation is a significant problem after graciloplasty and antegrade colonic enemas may be needed. Significant prognostic factors for obstructed defaecation remain to be identified. The mechanism of both continence failure and surgical morbidity remains poorly defined in many patients and requires further investigation. The individual patient can expect a 16% chance of normal faecal continence at 5 years, with at least one surgical morbidity as a result of the procedure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15521938     DOI: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2004.00714.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Colorectal Dis        ISSN: 1462-8910            Impact factor:   3.788


  18 in total

Review 1.  [Dynamic graciloplasty vs artificial bowel sphincter in the management of severe fecal incontinence].

Authors:  O Ruthmann; A Fischer; U T Hopt; H J Schrag
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 0.955

Review 2.  Treatment strategies in obstructed defecation and fecal incontinence.

Authors:  Marat Khaikin; Steven-D Wexner
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2006-05-28       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  Neurostimulated levator augmentation--a new approach in restoring continence.

Authors:  Christoph Isbert; Nicolas Schlegel; Joachim Reibetanz; Katica Krajinovic; Karsten Schmidt; Christoph-Thomas Germer; Mia Kim
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2015-02-10       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 4.  Neosphincter surgery for fecal incontinence: a critical and unbiased review of the relevant literature.

Authors:  Orlin Belyaev; Christophe Müller; Waldemar Uhl
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 2.549

Review 5.  Care of the patient with anorectal trauma.

Authors:  Daniel O Herzig
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2012-12

6.  In vivo growth of a bioengineered internal anal sphincter: comparison of growth factors for optimization of growth and survival.

Authors:  Eiichi A Miyasaka; Shreya Raghavan; Robert R Gilmont; Krittika Mittal; Sita Somara; Khalil N Bitar; Daniel H Teitelbaum
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 1.827

Review 7.  Current management of fecal incontinence: choosing amongst treatment options to optimize outcomes.

Authors:  Julie Ann M Van Koughnett; Steven D Wexner
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-12-28       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 8.  Faecal incontinence: Current knowledges and perspectives.

Authors:  Alban Benezech; Michel Bouvier; Véronique Vitton
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Pathophysiol       Date:  2016-02-15

Review 9.  Current management of fecal incontinence.

Authors:  Jennifer Y Wang; Maher A Abbas
Journal:  Perm J       Date:  2013

10.  Mucosal colonic tube fistula with antireflux wrap for antegrade colonic enema.

Authors:  Brendon Douglas Bowkett; E W Kelly
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2009-05-20       Impact factor: 1.827

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.