Literature DB >> 16549250

"Precision" and "accuracy": two terms that are neither.

David L Streiner1, Geoffrey R Norman.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: In some publications, the terms "precision" and "accuracy" are used as if they were synonyms for "reliability" and "validity." METHODS AND
RESULTS: This article shows that these terms are neither precise nor accurate when used in this way. Scales can demonstrate high test-retest or interrater reliability (i.e., they are "precise") but still be unreliable in certain circumstances; and "imprecise" scales can still show good reliability. Further, "accuracy" as a synonym for validity reflects an outdated conceptualization of validity, which has been superseded by one that emphasizes that validity tells us what conclusions can be drawn about a person based on a test result.
CONCLUSION: The article ends with a call for the use of the more traditional terms as better reflecting the process of scale development and the uses to which they are put.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16549250     DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2005.09.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol        ISSN: 0895-4356            Impact factor:   6.437


  25 in total

1.  Con: Can biomarkers be gold standards in Alzheimer's disease?

Authors:  Kenneth Rockwood
Journal:  Alzheimers Res Ther       Date:  2010-06-25       Impact factor: 6.982

Review 2.  Limitations in validating emergency department triage scales.

Authors:  Michele Twomey; Lee A Wallis; Jonathan E Myers
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 2.740

3.  Test weighing for term and premature infants is an accurate procedure: author's reply.

Authors:  Paul L P Brand
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 5.747

4.  The use of neural network technology to model swimming performance.

Authors:  António José Silva; Aldo Manuel Costa; Paulo Moura Oliveira; Victor Machado Reis; José Saavedra; Jurgen Perl; Abel Rouboa; Daniel Almeida Marinho
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2007-03-01       Impact factor: 2.988

5.  Automatic colorimetric calibration of human wounds.

Authors:  Sven Van Poucke; Yves Vander Haeghen; Kris Vissers; Theo Meert; Philippe Jorens
Journal:  BMC Med Imaging       Date:  2010-03-18       Impact factor: 1.930

6.  Cardiac output method comparison studies: the relation of the precision of agreement and the precision of method.

Authors:  Alexander Hapfelmeier; Maurizio Cecconi; Bernd Saugel
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2015-05-31       Impact factor: 2.502

Review 7.  The conceptualization and measurement of quality of life in older adults: a review of empirical studies published during 1994-2006.

Authors:  Liv Halvorsrud; Mary Kalfoss
Journal:  Eur J Ageing       Date:  2007-10-16

8.  The suitability of the WHOQOL-BREF for Canadian and Norwegian older adults.

Authors:  Mary H Kalfoss; Gail Low; Anita E Molzahn
Journal:  Eur J Ageing       Date:  2008-02-13

Review 9.  3D printed anatomical (bio)models in spine surgery: clinical benefits and value to health care providers.

Authors:  William C H Parr; Joshua L Burnard; Peter John Wilson; Ralph J Mobbs
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2019-12

Review 10.  A review of instruments assessing participation in persons with spinal cord injury.

Authors:  V K Noonan; W C Miller; L Noreau
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2009-02-24       Impact factor: 2.772

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.