Literature DB >> 16546030

Colonoscopy issues related to women.

Robynne Chutkan1.   

Abstract

Colonoscopy is the preferred method of screening for colorectal cancer in women. The longer, more redundant female colon is frequently more difficult for the endoscopist to navigate and most studies show longer insertion times, lower completion rates, and more discomfort associated with the procedure in women, all of which may be exacerbated by hysterectomy. To improve female patients' compliance with colorectal cancer screening we need to understand the barriers to participation prevalent among women. This article reviews the findings of several studies and discusses some steps to improve cancer screening for women.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16546030     DOI: 10.1016/j.giec.2006.01.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am        ISSN: 1052-5157


  9 in total

1.  Prone positioning of obese patients for colonoscopy results in shortened cecal intubation times: a randomized trial.

Authors:  Fatema S Uddin; Ramiz Iqbal; William V Harford; Kerry B Dunbar; Byron L Cryer; Stuart J Spechler; Linda A Feagins
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2012-11-10       Impact factor: 3.199

2.  Screening adherence for colorectal cancer among immigrant Hispanic women.

Authors:  Jennie Ellison; Lina Jandorf; Cristina Villagra; Gary Winkel; Katherine DuHamel
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 1.798

Review 3.  Interval Colorectal Cancer After Colonoscopy: Exploring Explanations and Solutions.

Authors:  Jeffrey Adler; Douglas J Robertson
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-11-10       Impact factor: 10.864

4.  Cecal intubation time in screening colonoscopy.

Authors:  Hyun Young Kim
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2021-05-14       Impact factor: 1.889

5.  Difficult colonoscopy score identifies the difficult patients undergoing unsedated colonoscopy.

Authors:  Hui Jia; Limei Wang; Hui Luo; Shaowei Yao; Xiangping Wang; Linhui Zhang; Rui Huang; Zhiguo Liu; Xiaoyu Kang; Yanglin Pan; Xuegang Guo
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-04-09       Impact factor: 3.067

6.  Predictors for difficult cecal insertion in colonoscopy: The impact of obesity indices.

Authors:  Soo Yun Moon; Byung Chang Kim; Dae Kyung Sohn; Kyung Su Han; Bun Kim; Chang Won Hong; Bum Joon Park; Kum Hei Ryu; Ji Hyung Nam
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-04-07       Impact factor: 5.742

7.  Efficacy and tolerability of colonoscopies in overweight and obese patients: Results from a national database on gastrointestinal endoscopic outcomes.

Authors:  Monica Passi; Farial Rahman; Christopher Koh; Sheila Kumar
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2022-04-14

8.  Index colonoscopy-related risk factors for postcolonoscopy colorectal cancers.

Authors:  Theodore A Tollivoro; Christopher D Jensen; Amy R Marks; Wei K Zhao; Joanne E Schottinger; Virginia P Quinn; Nirupa R Ghai; Ann G Zauber; Chyke A Doubeni; Theodore R Levin; Bruce Fireman; Charles P Quesenberry; Douglas A Corley
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2018-08-23       Impact factor: 9.427

9.  Complete colonoscopy: impact of patients' demographics and anthropometry on caecal intubation time.

Authors:  Adegboyega Akere; Jesse Abiodun Otegbayo
Journal:  BMJ Open Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-04-07
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.