Literature DB >> 16545702

Complications after zygoma fracture fixation: is there a difference between biodegradable materials and how do they compare with titanium osteosynthesis?

Gert Wittwer1, Wasiu Lanre Adeyemo, Kaan Yerit, Martin Voracek, Dritan Turhani, Franz Watzinger, Georg Enislidis.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Biodegradable materials are particularly useful for the fixation of zygomatic fractures. Different systems are commercially available. The aim of this study was to compare the clinical outcome of zygomatic fracture fixation using 3 biodegradable systems and a titanium osteosynthesis system. STUDY
DESIGN: Patients with displaced fractures of the zygomatic bone presenting at our department from October 2001 to May 2003 were randomly allocated to 1 of 3 treatment groups for fracture fixation (study group A: LactoSorb: n = 18; study group B: BioSorb: n = 18; study group C: Delta: n = 18). Treatment outcome and complication rates were compared with a historic patient group with zygomatic fractures fixed with titanium osteosynthesis (control group D: n = 15).
RESULTS: A total of 64 patients (study groups A + B + C: n = 49; control group D: n = 15) were followed for at least 24 months (range: 24 to 44 months). Forty-nine patients in the biodegradable study groups (group A: n = 15; group B: n = 17; group C: n = 17) who had their fractures fixed with biodegradable plates and screws alone or in combination with titanium plates and screws were reviewed postoperatively. Uneventful healing occurred during the entire follow-up period in 39 (80%) out of 49 patients in the biodegradable groups (A + B + C) and in 12 (80%) out of 15 patients in group D. Ten patients in groups A + B + C developed postoperative complications (infection: n = 3; soft tissue dehiscence: n = 2; implant-related tissue reactions: n = 5), compared with 3 patients in group D (soft tissue dehiscence: n = 1; unspecific pain: n = 2) (P = .97). Complications occurred in 4 patients in group A and 3 patients each in groups B and C. Smokers developed significantly more postoperative complications than nonsmokers in groups A + B + C (P = .01).
CONCLUSION: There was no significant difference between biodegradable osteosynthesis materials or between biodegradable materials and titanium fixation with respect to fracture healing and postoperative complications. Postoperative complications were of a minor nature and resolved spontaneously or after local therapy. Smoking habits may play a significant role in the incidence of complications with biodegradable materials.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16545702     DOI: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2005.07.026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod        ISSN: 1079-2104


  17 in total

1.  [Implant materials for the internal fixation of midfacial fractures].

Authors:  B A Stuck; T Heller
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 1.284

Review 2.  Comparison between resorbable plates vs. titanium plates for treatment of zygomatic fractures: a systematic review with meta-analysis.

Authors:  Bianca Cristina Lopes da Silva; Debora Souto-Souza; Glaciele Maria de Souza; Rafael Alvim Magesty; Bruna de Cassia Ávila; Endi Lanza Galvão; Saulo Gabriel Moreira Falci
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2021-01-04

3.  Evaluation of soft tissue asymmetry using cone-beam computed tomography after open reduction and internal fixation of zygomaticomaxillary complex fracture.

Authors:  Dong Hyuck Kim; Rae Hyong Kim; Jun Lee; Young Deok Chee; Kyung Hwan Kwon; Kyoung-Hwan Kwon
Journal:  J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2014-06-27

4.  Histological examination of bone regeneration achieved by combining grafting with hydroxyapatite and thermoplastic bioresorbable plates.

Authors:  Taku Kojima; Norio Amizuka; Akiko Suzuki; Paulo Henrique Luiz de Freitas; Michiko Yoshizawa; Akira Kudo; Chikara Saito; Takeyasu Maeda
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2007-10-25       Impact factor: 2.626

5.  Resorbable implants in maxillofacial surgery: a reality check.

Authors:  Suresh Menon; Col Sk Roy Choudhury
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2011-04-07

6.  Complications of a poly-L-lactic acid and polyglycolic acid osteosynthesis device for internal fixation in maxillofacial surgery.

Authors:  Shintaro Sukegawa; Takahiro Kanno; Kenichi Matsumoto; Yuka Sukegawa-Takahashi; Masanori Masui; Yoshihiko Furuki
Journal:  Odontology       Date:  2018-02-07       Impact factor: 2.634

7.  Etiology, Modalities of Zygomaticomaxillary Complex Fracture, open reduction and fixation.

Authors:  Virendra-Kumar Prajapati; Ajoy-Kumar Shahi; Om Prakash; Subia Ekram
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2021-03-01

Review 8.  WITHDRAWN: Resorbable versus titanium plates for facial fractures.

Authors:  Mojtaba Dorri; Richard Oliver
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-05-23

9.  Complications of absorbable fixation in maxillofacial surgery: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Liya Yang; Meibang Xu; Xiaolei Jin; Jiajie Xu; Jianjian Lu; Chao Zhang; Tian Tian; Li Teng
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-28       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  To evaluate the efficacy of biodegradable plating system for fixation of maxillofacial fractures: A prospective study.

Authors:  Rishi K Bali; Parveen Sharma; Shalu Jindal; Shivani Gaba
Journal:  Natl J Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2013-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.