Literature DB >> 1654503

Levels of chromosomally encoded Umu proteins and requirements for in vivo UmuD cleavage.

R Woodgate1, D G Ennis.   

Abstract

Most of the inducible mutagenesis observed in Escherichia coli after treatment with many DNA damaging agents is dependent upon the products of the umuD,C operon. RecA-mediated proteolytic processing of UmuD yields a carboxyl-terminal fragment (UmuD') that is active for mutagenesis. Processing of UmuD is therefore a critical step in the fixation of mutations. In this paper we have analyzed the requirements for UmuD processing in vivo. Standard immuno-detection assays, coupled with a sensitive chemiluminescence detection assay, have been utilized to probe levels of chromosomally encoded Umu proteins from whole-cell E. coli extracts. We found that the derepression of additional SOS gene products, other than RecA, was not required for UmuD processing. Moreover, efficient cleavage of UmuD was observed only in the presence of elevated levels of activated RecA, suggesting that efficient processing would occur only under conditions of severe DNA damage. Detection of chromosomally encoded Umu proteins has allowed us, for the first time, to measure directly the cellular steady-state levels of these proteins under various SOS inducing conditions. UmuD was present at approximately 180 copies per uninduced cell and was measured at approximately 2400 copies per cell in strains that lacked a functional repressor. Induced levels of UmuC were approximately 12-fold lower than UmuD with approximately 200 molecules per cell. These levels of cellular UmuC protein suggest that it functions through specific protein-DNA or protein-protein interactions, possibly as a lesion recognition protein or by interacting with DNA polymerase III.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1654503     DOI: 10.1007/bf00264207

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Gen Genet        ISSN: 0026-8925


  42 in total

1.  Different efficiency of UmuDC and MucAB proteins in UV light induced mutagenesis in Escherichia coli.

Authors:  M Blanco; G Herrera; V Aleixandre
Journal:  Mol Gen Genet       Date:  1986-11

2.  Dual role for Escherichia coli RecA protein in SOS mutagenesis.

Authors:  D G Ennis; B Fisher; S Edmiston; D W Mount
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1985-05       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4.

Authors:  U K Laemmli
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1970-08-15       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 4.  Ultraviolet mutagenesis and inducible DNA repair in Escherichia coli.

Authors:  E M Witkin
Journal:  Bacteriol Rev       Date:  1976-12

5.  Mutagenic repair in Escherichia coli: products of the recA gene and of the umuD and umuC genes act at different steps in UV-induced mutagenesis.

Authors:  B A Bridges; R Woodgate
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1985-06       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Influence of RecA protein on induced mutagenesis.

Authors:  M Blanco; G Herrera; P Collado; J E Rebollo; L M Botella
Journal:  Biochimie       Date:  1982 Aug-Sep       Impact factor: 4.079

Review 7.  The SOS regulatory system of Escherichia coli.

Authors:  J W Little; D W Mount
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1982-05       Impact factor: 41.582

8.  Inducibility of a gene product required for UV and chemical mutagenesis in Escherichia coli.

Authors:  A Bagg; C J Kenyon; G C Walker
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1981-09       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 9.  Genetic functions promoting homologous recombination in Escherichia coli: a study of inversions in phage lambda.

Authors:  D G Ennis; S K Amundsen; G R Smith
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1987-01       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  RecA protein-dependent cleavage of UmuD protein and SOS mutagenesis.

Authors:  H Shinagawa; H Iwasaki; T Kato; A Nakata
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1988-03       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  79 in total

1.  A model for a umuDC-dependent prokaryotic DNA damage checkpoint.

Authors:  T Opperman; S Murli; B T Smith; G C Walker
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-08-03       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Intrinsic polymerase activities of UmuD'(2)C and MucA'(2)B are responsible for their different mutagenic properties during bypass of a T-T cis-syn cyclobutane dimer.

Authors:  P I O'Grady; A Borden; D Vandewiele; A Ozgenc; R Woodgate; C W Lawrence
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 3.490

Review 3.  Roles of DNA polymerases V and II in SOS-induced error-prone and error-free repair in Escherichia coli.

Authors:  P Pham; S Rangarajan; R Woodgate; M F Goodman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-07-17       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Posttranslational modification of the umuD-encoded subunit of Escherichia coli DNA polymerase V regulates its interactions with the beta processivity clamp.

Authors:  Mark D Sutton; Issay Narumi; Graham C Walker
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-04-16       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 5.  DNA replication fidelity in Escherichia coli: a multi-DNA polymerase affair.

Authors:  Iwona J Fijalkowska; Roel M Schaaper; Piotr Jonczyk
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Rev       Date:  2012-04-05       Impact factor: 16.408

6.  Competitive processivity-clamp usage by DNA polymerases during DNA replication and repair.

Authors:  Francisco J López de Saro; Roxana E Georgescu; Myron F Goodman; Mike O'Donnell
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2003-12-01       Impact factor: 11.598

7.  Escherichia coli umuDC mutants: DNA sequence alterations and UmuD cleavage.

Authors:  W H Koch; D G Ennis; A S Levine; R Woodgate
Journal:  Mol Gen Genet       Date:  1992-06

8.  Activity of the purified mutagenesis proteins UmuC, UmuD', and RecA in replicative bypass of an abasic DNA lesion by DNA polymerase III.

Authors:  M Rajagopalan; C Lu; R Woodgate; M O'Donnell; M F Goodman; H Echols
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1992-11-15       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 9.  A new model for SOS-induced mutagenesis: how RecA protein activates DNA polymerase V.

Authors:  Meghna Patel; Qingfei Jiang; Roger Woodgate; Michael M Cox; Myron F Goodman
Journal:  Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 8.250

10.  UmuD(2) inhibits a non-covalent step during DinB-mediated template slippage on homopolymeric nucleotide runs.

Authors:  James J Foti; Angela M Delucia; Catherine M Joyce; Graham C Walker
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2010-05-13       Impact factor: 5.157

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.