PURPOSE: The technical feasibility of combining catheter directed coronary enhancement and multidetector computed tomographic angiography (MD-CTA) is presented in a swine model at various cardiac and injection rates. MATERIALS/ METHODS: A 64-slice CT scanner was used under animal IRB approval in four sedated swine. Common femoral venous/arterial access with a 5 Fr micropuncture kit was ultrasound guided. Investigational 5 Fr diffusion-tip pigtail [aortic root (AR)-MD-CTA] and conventional 5 Fr coronary [selective (S)-MD-CTA] catheters were positioned on the CT table with c-arm fluoroscopy. AR-MD-CTA commenced 1-2 s after injection of 50 cc Visipaque mixed with 50 cc NS at 6 cc/s (n=3), 8 cc/s (n=5) or 10 cc/s (n=7) (HR=120, 100, 90, 80 or 65 bpm). S-MD-CTA (right and left, n=4) (HR= 90, 80, or 65 bpm) commenced 1-2 s after injection of 5 cc Visipaque mixed with 5 cc NS (1 cc/s). IV-MD-CTA (n=4) (HR=80 bpm) commenced 5 or 10 s after aortic peak density with 100 cc Visipaque (5 cc/s) and 50 or 75 cc NS (5 cc/s) flush. Conventional angiography (n=2) used standard protocol. MD-CTA was performed with the following parameters: collimation 0.6 mm, tube rotation time 0.3 s, table feed/rotation 3.8 mm, scan time 10-12 s, tube voltage 120 kVp, effective mAs 850, pitch 0.2, FOV 109-123 mm, slice thickness/increment 0.6 mm/0.3 mm, kernel B25 f smooth. Ex vivo imaging (64-slice CT, n=3) was also performed. Post-processing consisted of coronary peak densities, 3D-MIP's and 4D projections. RESULTS: Catheter directed MD-CTA was feasible at all injection rates at and below 100 bpm and yielded higher peak coronary attenuation values than IV-enhanced studies. Definition and clarity of the tributary and distal anatomy was also higher than IV-enhanced CTA. CONCLUSIONS: Catheter directed MD-CTA can be performed by retrofitting the current CT scanner with a portable c-arm fluoroscopy unit. S and AR MD-CTA provide high coronary anatomy definition and luminal attenuation without obscuring cardiac chamber signal and with the least iodinated contrast volume.
PURPOSE: The technical feasibility of combining catheter directed coronary enhancement and multidetector computed tomographic angiography (MD-CTA) is presented in a swine model at various cardiac and injection rates. MATERIALS/ METHODS: A 64-slice CT scanner was used under animal IRB approval in four sedated swine. Common femoral venous/arterial access with a 5 Fr micropuncture kit was ultrasound guided. Investigational 5 Fr diffusion-tip pigtail [aortic root (AR)-MD-CTA] and conventional 5 Fr coronary [selective (S)-MD-CTA] catheters were positioned on the CT table with c-arm fluoroscopy. AR-MD-CTA commenced 1-2 s after injection of 50 cc Visipaque mixed with 50 cc NS at 6 cc/s (n=3), 8 cc/s (n=5) or 10 cc/s (n=7) (HR=120, 100, 90, 80 or 65 bpm). S-MD-CTA (right and left, n=4) (HR= 90, 80, or 65 bpm) commenced 1-2 s after injection of 5 cc Visipaque mixed with 5 cc NS (1 cc/s). IV-MD-CTA (n=4) (HR=80 bpm) commenced 5 or 10 s after aortic peak density with 100 cc Visipaque (5 cc/s) and 50 or 75 cc NS (5 cc/s) flush. Conventional angiography (n=2) used standard protocol. MD-CTA was performed with the following parameters: collimation 0.6 mm, tube rotation time 0.3 s, table feed/rotation 3.8 mm, scan time 10-12 s, tube voltage 120 kVp, effective mAs 850, pitch 0.2, FOV 109-123 mm, slice thickness/increment 0.6 mm/0.3 mm, kernel B25 f smooth. Ex vivo imaging (64-slice CT, n=3) was also performed. Post-processing consisted of coronary peak densities, 3D-MIP's and 4D projections. RESULTS: Catheter directed MD-CTA was feasible at all injection rates at and below 100 bpm and yielded higher peak coronary attenuation values than IV-enhanced studies. Definition and clarity of the tributary and distal anatomy was also higher than IV-enhanced CTA. CONCLUSIONS: Catheter directed MD-CTA can be performed by retrofitting the current CT scanner with a portable c-arm fluoroscopy unit. S and AR MD-CTA provide high coronary anatomy definition and luminal attenuation without obscuring cardiac chamber signal and with the least iodinated contrast volume.
Authors: A Knez; C R Becker; A Leber; B Ohnesorge; A Becker; C White; R Haberl; M F Reiser; G Steinbeck Journal: Am J Cardiol Date: 2001-11-15 Impact factor: 2.778
Authors: S Achenbach; T Giesler; D Ropers; S Ulzheimer; H Derlien; C Schulte; E Wenkel; W Moshage; W Bautz; W G Daniel; W A Kalender; U Baum Journal: Circulation Date: 2001-05-29 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Koen Nieman; Filippo Cademartiri; Pedro A Lemos; Rolf Raaijmakers; Peter M T Pattynama; Pim J de Feyter Journal: Circulation Date: 2002-10-15 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Dieter Ropers; Ulrich Baum; Karsten Pohle; Katharina Anders; Stefan Ulzheimer; Bernd Ohnesorge; Christian Schlundt; Werner Bautz; Werner G Daniel; Stephan Achenbach Journal: Circulation Date: 2003-02-11 Impact factor: 29.690