D G Parr1, B C Stoel, J Stolk, R A Stockley. 1. Lung Investigation Unit, First Floor, Nuffield House, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham B15 2TH, UK, and Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Centre, The Netherlands.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Lung densitometry derived from computed tomographic images offers an opportunity to quantify emphysema non-invasively, but a pathological standard cannot be applied to validate its use in longitudinal monitoring studies. Consequently, forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) remains the standard against which new methods must be judged. We related progression of densitometry (15th percentile point and voxel index, threshold -950 Hounsfield units) to disease stage and FEV1 decline in two studies of subjects with alpha1-antitrypsin deficiency (PiZ). METHODS: Consistency of progression, measured using densitometry and FEV1, was assessed in relation to disease stage in a 2 year study of 74 subjects grouped according to the FEV1 criteria employed in the GOLD guidelines. In the second study of a subgroup of subjects with extended data (n=34), summary statistics were applied to measurements performed annually over 3 years and the rate of progression of densitometry was related to FEV1 decline. RESULTS: The progression of percentile point was consistent across a wide spectrum of disease severity, but voxel index progression varied in association with disease stage (p=0.004). In the second study, FEV1 decline correlated with progression of lung densitometry (percentile point: rS=0.527, p=0.001; voxel index: rS=-0.398, p=0.012). CONCLUSIONS: 15th percentile point is a more consistent measure of lung density loss across a wide range of physiological impairment than voxel index. However, both methods are valid for use in longitudinal and interventional studies in which emphysema is the major outcome target.
BACKGROUND: Lung densitometry derived from computed tomographic images offers an opportunity to quantify emphysema non-invasively, but a pathological standard cannot be applied to validate its use in longitudinal monitoring studies. Consequently, forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) remains the standard against which new methods must be judged. We related progression of densitometry (15th percentile point and voxel index, threshold -950 Hounsfield units) to disease stage and FEV1 decline in two studies of subjects with alpha1-antitrypsin deficiency (PiZ). METHODS: Consistency of progression, measured using densitometry and FEV1, was assessed in relation to disease stage in a 2 year study of 74 subjects grouped according to the FEV1 criteria employed in the GOLD guidelines. In the second study of a subgroup of subjects with extended data (n=34), summary statistics were applied to measurements performed annually over 3 years and the rate of progression of densitometry was related to FEV1 decline. RESULTS: The progression of percentile point was consistent across a wide spectrum of disease severity, but voxel index progression varied in association with disease stage (p=0.004). In the second study, FEV1 decline correlated with progression of lung densitometry (percentile point: rS=0.527, p=0.001; voxel index: rS=-0.398, p=0.012). CONCLUSIONS: 15th percentile point is a more consistent measure of lung density loss across a wide range of physiological impairment than voxel index. However, both methods are valid for use in longitudinal and interventional studies in which emphysema is the major outcome target.
Authors: A Dirksen; J H Dijkman; F Madsen; B Stoel; D C Hutchison; C S Ulrik; L T Skovgaard; A Kok-Jensen; A Rudolphus; N Seersholm; H A Vrooman; J H Reiber; N C Hansen; T Heckscher; K Viskum; J Stolk Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 1999-11 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: M Mishima; T Hirai; H Itoh; Y Nakano; H Sakai; S Muro; K Nishimura; Y Oku; K Chin; M Ohi; T Nakamura; J H Bates; A M Alencar; B Suki Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 1999-08-03 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: J Stolk; A Dirksen; A A van der Lugt; J Hutsebaut; J Mathieu; J de Ree; J H Reiber; B C Stoel Journal: Invest Radiol Date: 2001-11 Impact factor: 6.016
Authors: Daniel Chong; Matthew S Brown; Hyun J Kim; Eva M van Rikxoort; Laura Guzman; Michael F McNitt-Gray; Maryam Khatonabadi; Maya Galperin-Aizenberg; Heidi Coy; Katherine Yang; Yongha Jung; Jonathan G Goldin Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2011-10-20 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Matthew Moll; Dandi Qiao; Elizabeth A Regan; Gary M Hunninghake; Barry J Make; Ruth Tal-Singer; Michael J McGeachie; Peter J Castaldi; Raul San Jose Estepar; George R Washko; James M Wells; David LaFon; Matthew Strand; Russell P Bowler; MeiLan K Han; Jorgen Vestbo; Bartolome Celli; Peter Calverley; James Crapo; Edwin K Silverman; Brian D Hobbs; Michael H Cho Journal: Chest Date: 2020-04-27 Impact factor: 9.410
Authors: Yrjo Hame; Elsa D Angelini; Eric A Hoffman; R Graham Barr; Andrew F Laine Journal: IEEE Trans Med Imaging Date: 2014-04-15 Impact factor: 10.048
Authors: Robert H Brown; Allison Brooker; Robert A Wise; Curt Reynolds; Claudio Loccioni; Adolfo Russo; Terence H Risby Journal: J Breath Res Date: 2013-02-27 Impact factor: 3.262