Whole-lung densitometry versus visual assessment of emphysema.

We compared whole-lung densitometry with visual evaluation of pulmonary emphysema. Thirty patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease underwent multi-detector CT (150 mAs and 0.75 collimation) with double reconstruction: thick (5-mm) slices with smooth filter for whole-lung densitometry and thin (1 mm) slices with sharp filter for visual assessment (one of every ten slices). Densitometry and visual assessment were performed by three operators each, and the time required for assessment, the inter-observer agreement and the correlation with the results of the diffusion capacity of carbon monoxide (DL(CO)) in the same patients were computed. The average time for densitometry (8.49 +/- 0.13 min) was significantly longer (p < 0.0001) than that for visual evaluation (5.14 +/- 0.11 min). However, the inter-operator agreement ranged between "moderate" to "almost perfect" for densitometry (kappa range 0.58-0.87) and "slight" for visual (kappa = 0.20) assessment. The correlation coefficients of DL(CO) with relative area at -960 and -970 Hounsfield units (HU) (both r = -0.66) and of the first percentile point of lung density (r = 0.66) were slightly stronger than that of the visual score (r = -0.62). Densitometry should be preferred to visual assessment because it enables a more reproducible evaluation of the extent of pulmonary emphysema, which can be carried out on the entire lung in a reasonable amount of time.