Literature DB >> 16536767

A survey of help-seeking and treatment provision in women with stress urinary incontinence.

Christine Shaw1, Roben Das Gupta, Kate S Williams, R Philip Assassa, Catherine McGrother.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To establish the prevalence of treatment-seeking in women with stress urinary incontinence (SUI), the extent and type of treatment provision, and the levels of unmet need in women who have and have not accessed care, as SUI in women is common but only a small proportion seek help, and there are reports suggesting that few women receive appropriate treatment. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: A cross-sectional postal survey was conducted in which questionnaires were sent to a random sample of community-dwelling women aged > or = 40 years, registered with participating general practitioners (GPs) and living in Leicestershire. The questionnaires addressed urinary symptoms and their impact on quality of life, and service use in the preceding 12 months; 15 359 questionnaires were mailed and 9340 (60.8%) were returned complete.
RESULTS: Of the respondents, 7.7% reported SUI monthly or more often, and 15% of those had sought help. Help-seekers reported more severe symptoms and greater impact on quality of life. Most (78%) had spoken to their GP, and 77% had received some form of treatment or advice, but only 35% had received recommended treatments. The effects on quality of life were not related to treatment provision.
CONCLUSIONS: Most women with SUI are treated in primary care; access to appropriate treatments is poor and may, in part, be the cause of the high levels of unmet need observed in this study. Health education interventions may aid appropriate help-seeking and self-care strategies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16536767     DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2006.06071.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJU Int        ISSN: 1464-4096            Impact factor:   5.588


  24 in total

1.  Urinary incontinence among women-which personal and professional relations are involved? A population-based study.

Authors:  Isabella Raasthøj; Sandra Elnegaard; Marianne Rosendal; Dorte Ejg Jarbøl
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2018-11-05       Impact factor: 2.894

2.  Patient-Provider Discussions About Urinary Incontinence Among Older Women.

Authors:  Giulia I Lane; Kaitlin Hagan; Elisabeth Erekson; Vatche A Minassian; Francine Grodstein; Julie Bynum
Journal:  J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci       Date:  2021-02-25       Impact factor: 6.053

3.  Conservative treatment options for women with stress urinary incontinence: clinical update.

Authors:  Mari Imamura; David Jenkinson; Sheila Wallace; Brian Buckley; Luke Vale; Robert Pickard
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 5.386

4.  Prevalence, Awareness, and Understanding of Pelvic Floor Disorders in Adolescent and Young Women.

Authors:  Alison M Parden; Russell L Griffin; Kimberly Hoover; David R Ellington; Jonathan L Gleason; Kathryn L Burgio; Holly E Richter
Journal:  Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg       Date:  2016 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.091

5.  Written versus oral disclosure of fecal and urinary incontinence in women with dual incontinence.

Authors:  Sara B Cichowski; Yuko M Komesu; Gena C Dunivan; Clifford Qualls; Rebecca G Rogers
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2014-05-08       Impact factor: 2.894

6.  Evaluating patient learning after an educational program for women with incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse.

Authors:  Roxana Geoffrion; Magali Robert; Sue Ross; Daniela van Heerden; Grace Neustaedter; Selphee Tang; Jill Milne
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2009-06-11

7.  Transurethral collagen denaturation for women with stress urinary incontinence.

Authors:  Rodney A Appell
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 3.092

8.  Women's perceptions about the etiology of urinary incontinence.

Authors:  Jennifer L Melville; Lauren E Wagner; Ming-Yu Fan; Wayne J Katon; Katherine M Newton
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 2.681

Review 9.  Nonbiologic factors that impact management in women with urinary incontinence: review of the literature and findings from a National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases workshop.

Authors:  Jenna M Norton; Jennifer L Dodson; Diane K Newman; Rebecca G Rogers; Andrea D Fairman; Helen L Coons; Robert A Star; Tamara G Bavendam
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2017-07-03       Impact factor: 2.894

10.  A qualitative inquiry of patient-reported outcomes: the case of lower urinary tract symptoms.

Authors:  Lisa C Welch; Elizabeth M Botelho; Jean Journel Joseph; Sharon L Tennstedt
Journal:  Nurs Res       Date:  2012 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.381

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.