Alison M Parden1, Russell L Griffin, Kimberly Hoover, David R Ellington, Jonathan L Gleason, Kathryn L Burgio, Holly E Richter. 1. From the *Division of Urogynecology and Pelvic Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, †Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, and ‡Division of Women's Reproductive Health, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; §Division of Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Virginia Tech Carilion School of Medicine, Roanoke, VA; and ║Division of Gerontology, Geriatrics, and Palliative Care, Department of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham and Birmingham/Atlanta Geriatric Research, Education, and Clinical Center, Department of Veterans Affairs, Birmingham, AL.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to characterize symptom prevalence, awareness of pelvic floor disorders (PFDs) in family/friends, and understanding of factors contributing to the development of PFDs in women aged 19 to 30 years. METHODS: This study is a cross-sectional study via online questionnaire survey of female students aged 19 to 30 years enrolled at the University of Alabama at Birmingham. Results of "adolescent women" aged 19 to 24 years were compared with "young women" aged 25 to 30 years. RESULTS: A total of 1092 questionnaires were completed with the mean age being 23.5 ± 3.1 years. The overall rate of urinary incontinence (UI) was 10.3% without a difference between adolescent and young women (P = 0.61). There were no differences in rates of urgency UI (P = 0.061), stress UI (P = 0.29), or pelvic organ prolapse (POP) symptoms (P = 0.56) between groups. There was no difference between groups in awareness of family members with UI, fecal incontinence (FI), or POP symptoms (P ≥ 0.24). However, logistic regression showed that the young women were more likely to have received education regarding UI (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 2.6; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.8-3.6), FI (aOR, 3.3; 95% CI, 2.2-4.8), POP (aOR, 2.9; 95% CI, 2.1-4.2), and have greater understanding regarding causes of UI (aOR, 2.9; 95% CI, 1.7-4.8), FI (aOR, 1.6; 95% CI, 1.1-2.3), and POP (aOR, 1.9; 95% CI, 1.3-2.9). CONCLUSIONS: Women aged 25 to 30 years had more awareness and understanding of PFDs compared with adolescent women. These data may have implications for primary prevention strategies of PFDs.
OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to characterize symptom prevalence, awareness of pelvic floor disorders (PFDs) in family/friends, and understanding of factors contributing to the development of PFDs in women aged 19 to 30 years. METHODS: This study is a cross-sectional study via online questionnaire survey of female students aged 19 to 30 years enrolled at the University of Alabama at Birmingham. Results of "adolescent women" aged 19 to 24 years were compared with "young women" aged 25 to 30 years. RESULTS: A total of 1092 questionnaires were completed with the mean age being 23.5 ± 3.1 years. The overall rate of urinary incontinence (UI) was 10.3% without a difference between adolescent and young women (P = 0.61). There were no differences in rates of urgency UI (P = 0.061), stress UI (P = 0.29), or pelvic organ prolapse (POP) symptoms (P = 0.56) between groups. There was no difference between groups in awareness of family members with UI, fecal incontinence (FI), or POP symptoms (P ≥ 0.24). However, logistic regression showed that the young women were more likely to have received education regarding UI (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 2.6; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.8-3.6), FI (aOR, 3.3; 95% CI, 2.2-4.8), POP (aOR, 2.9; 95% CI, 2.1-4.2), and have greater understanding regarding causes of UI (aOR, 2.9; 95% CI, 1.7-4.8), FI (aOR, 1.6; 95% CI, 1.1-2.3), and POP (aOR, 1.9; 95% CI, 1.3-2.9). CONCLUSIONS:Women aged 25 to 30 years had more awareness and understanding of PFDs compared with adolescent women. These data may have implications for primary prevention strategies of PFDs.
Authors: T H Rockwood; J M Church; J W Fleshman; R L Kane; C Mavrantonis; A G Thorson; S D Wexner; D Bliss; A C Lowry Journal: Dis Colon Rectum Date: 1999-12 Impact factor: 4.585
Authors: Jennifer M Wu; Amie Kawasaki; Andrew F Hundley; Alexis A Dieter; Evan R Myers; Vivian W Sung Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol Date: 2011-04-02 Impact factor: 8.661
Authors: Jennifer M Wu; Catherine A Matthews; Mitchell M Conover; Virginia Pate; Michele Jonsson Funk Journal: Obstet Gynecol Date: 2014-06 Impact factor: 7.661
Authors: Chi Chiung Grace Chen; Patrick Gatmaitan; Sidney Koepp; Matthew D Barber; Bipan Chand; Philip R Schauer; Stacy A Brethauer Journal: Surg Obes Relat Dis Date: 2008-10-29 Impact factor: 4.734
Authors: S P Jürgensen; A Borghi-Silva; A M F G Bastos; G N Correia; V S Pereira-Baldon; R Cabiddu; A M Catai; P Driusso Journal: Braz J Med Biol Res Date: 2017-09-21 Impact factor: 2.590
Authors: Lea Tami Suzuki Zuchelo; Edige Felipe de Sousa Santos; Francisco Winter Dos Santos Figueiredo; Fernando Adami; Italla Maria Pinheiro Bezerra; Rodrigo Daminello Raimundo; Isabel Cristina Esposito Sorpreso; Luiz Carlos de Abreu Journal: Int J Womens Health Date: 2018-08-24
Authors: María Zahara Pintos-Díaz; Paula Parás-Bravo; Cristina Alonso-Blanco; César Fernández-de-Las-Peñas; María Paz-Zulueta; Mónica Cueli-Arce; Domingo Palacios-Ceña Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2019-06-17 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Mukhtar Nur Farihan; Beng Kwang Ng; Su Ee Phon; Mohamed Ismail Nor Azlin; Abdul Ghani Nur Azurah; Pei Shan Lim Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-07-07 Impact factor: 4.614