Literature DB >> 24807424

Written versus oral disclosure of fecal and urinary incontinence in women with dual incontinence.

Sara B Cichowski1, Yuko M Komesu, Gena C Dunivan, Clifford Qualls, Rebecca G Rogers.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: To compare fecal incontinence (FI) and urinary incontinence (UI) disclosure in women with dual incontinence (DI), and to assess UI disclosure in DI subjects compared with women with UI alone. We hypothesized that women with DI would be less likely to disclose FI in comparison to UI and as likely to disclose UI as women with UI alone.
METHODS: We performed a retrospective chart review of new patient visits to an academic urogynecology clinic from 2007 to 2011. Clinical records were reviewed; demographic data and responses to the Incontinence Severity Index (ISI) and Wexner scales were recorded. Patients' written responses to the ISI and Wexner were compared with the diagnoses obtained from the oral history by the physician.
RESULTS: Of 1,899 women in the database, 557 women were diagnosed with DI and 447 women were diagnosed with UI alone. Women with DI were less likely to orally disclose FI than UI (135 out of 557 [23 %], vs 485 out of 557 [87 %], p < 0.001), but were as likely as women with UI alone to disclose UI (385 out of 447 [86 %] vs 485 out of 557 [87 %], p = 0.66). In the multivariate analysis, DI subjects had greater odds of disclosing FI to their physicians if they had private insurance (OR 1.9, 95 %CI 1.2, 3.0) or Wexner score >7 (OR 9.0, 95 % CI 5.4,14.8) and lower ISI score (OR 1.5, CI 1.4, 1.6).
CONCLUSIONS: Women with DI were less likely to report FI in comparison to UI. Patients were more likely to orally report FI when the symptoms were severe.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24807424      PMCID: PMC4573595          DOI: 10.1007/s00192-014-2393-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Urogynecol J        ISSN: 0937-3462            Impact factor:   2.894


  22 in total

1.  Prevalence and burden of fecal incontinence: a population-based study in women.

Authors:  Adil E Bharucha; Alan R Zinsmeister; G Richard Locke; Barbara M Seide; Kimberly McKeon; Cathy D Schleck; L Joseph Melton
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 22.682

Review 2.  Understanding disgust in nursing: abjection, self, and the other.

Authors:  Dave Holmes; Amélie Perron; Patrick O'Byrne
Journal:  Res Theory Nurs Pract       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 0.688

3.  Getting minds out of the sewer.

Authors:  Greg Miller
Journal:  Science       Date:  2012-08-10       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Effect of bothersome overactive bladder symptoms on health-related quality of life, anxiety, depression, and treatment seeking in the United States: results from EpiLUTS.

Authors:  Ian Milsom; Steven A Kaplan; Karin S Coyne; Chris C Sexton; Zoe S Kopp
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 2.649

Review 5.  Etiology and management of fecal incontinence.

Authors:  J M Jorge; S D Wexner
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 4.585

6.  The association between fecal incontinence and sexual activity and function in women attending a tertiary referral center.

Authors:  Sara B Cichowski; Yuko M Komesu; Gena C Dunivan; Rebecca G Rogers
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2013-02-07       Impact factor: 2.894

7.  Factors associated with symptom severity in women presenting with fecal incontinence.

Authors:  S B Menees; T M Smith; X Xu; W D Chey; R J Saad; D E Fenner
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 4.585

8.  Validation of a severity index in female urinary incontinence and its implementation in an epidemiological survey.

Authors:  H Sandvik; S Hunskaar; A Seim; R Hermstad; A Vanvik; H Bratt
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 3.710

9.  Risk factors for urinary, fecal, or dual incontinence in the Nurses' Health Study.

Authors:  Catherine A Matthews; William E Whitehead; Mary K Townsend; Francine Grodstein
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 7.661

10.  The effect of concealed concomitant anal incontinence symptoms in patients with urinary incontinence on their quality of life.

Authors:  Selcuk Selcuk; Cetin Cam; Mehmet Resit Asoglu; Ates Karateke
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2012-05-15       Impact factor: 2.894

View more
  5 in total

1.  Barriers to seeking care for accidental bowel leakage: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Heidi Wendell Brown; Rebecca G Rogers; Meg E Wise
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2016-11-14       Impact factor: 2.894

2.  The relationship of 3-D translabial ultrasound anal sphincter complex measurements to postpartum anal and fecal incontinence.

Authors:  Kate V Meriwether; Rebecca J Hall; Lawrence M Leeman; Laura Migliaccio; Clifford Qualls; Rebecca G Rogers
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2015-06-18       Impact factor: 2.894

3.  Tools for fecal incontinence assessment: lessons for inflammatory bowel disease trials based on a systematic review.

Authors:  Ferdinando D'Amico; Steven D Wexner; Carolynne J Vaizey; Célia Gouynou; Silvio Danese; Laurent Peyrin-Biroulet
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2020-07-17       Impact factor: 4.623

4.  If We Don't Ask, They Won't Tell: Screening for Urinary and Fecal Incontinence by Primary Care Providers.

Authors:  Heidi W Brown; Wen Guan; Nicholas B Schmuhl; Paul D Smith; William E Whitehead; Rebecca G Rogers
Journal:  J Am Board Fam Med       Date:  2018 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.657

5.  Small-Group, Community-Member Intervention for Urinary and Bowel Incontinence: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Heidi W Brown; Emilie J Braun; Meg E Wise; Shannon Myers; Zhanhai Li; Emmanuel Sampene; Sierra M Jansen; D Paul Moberg; Jane E Mahoney; Rebecca G Rogers
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 7.623

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.