Literature DB >> 1653363

Superiority of granisetron to dexamethasone plus prochlorperazine in the prevention of chemotherapy-induced emesis.

D Warr1, A Willan, S Fine, K Wilson, A Davis, C Erlichman, J Rusthoven, W Lofters, D Osoba, F Laberge.   

Abstract

Trials of selective 5-hydroxytryptamine3 receptor antagonists have shown excellent antiemetic activity for chemotherapy containing cisplatin when compared with high-dose metoclopramide. There is little information about the efficacy of these new agents for chemotherapy other than for high-dose cisplatin. We performed a double-blind, randomized trial comparing a single dose of the 5-hydroxytryptamine3 receptor antagonist granisetron (BRL 43694A) as a single intravenous dose with dexamethasone plus prochlorperazine in 152 patients receiving their first course of moderately emetogenic chemotherapy (mainly doxorubicin- and cyclophosphamide-containing combinations). During the first 24 hours, there was a statistically significant advantage for the granisetron group in terms of the prevention of both nausea and emesis. There was no difference in the frequency of reported adverse events. We conclude that granisetron is more effective than dexamethasone plus prochlorperazine in patients who are receiving moderately emetogenic cytotoxic agents.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1653363     DOI: 10.1093/jnci/83.16.1169

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst        ISSN: 0027-8874            Impact factor:   13.506


  12 in total

Review 1.  Comparative studies of various antiemetic regimens.

Authors:  F Roila; M Tonato; E Ballatori; A Del Favero
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 2.  Standard treatment of chemotherapy-induced emesis.

Authors:  D Warr
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 3.  Acute emesis: moderately emetogenic chemotherapy.

Authors:  Jørn Herrstedt; Jim M Koeller; Fausto Roila; Paul J Hesketh; David Warr; Cynthia Rittenberg; Mario Dicato
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2004-11-23       Impact factor: 3.603

4.  Inconsistency of prognostic factors for post-chemotherapy nausea and vomiting.

Authors:  J Pater; L Slamet; B Zee; D Osoba; D Warr; J Rusthoven
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 5.  Antiemetics in cancer chemotherapy: historical perspective and current state of the art.

Authors:  M Tonato; F Roila; A Del Favero; E Ballatori
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 3.603

6.  Impact of chemotherapy-associated nausea and vomiting on patients' functional status and on costs: survey of five Canadian centres.

Authors:  B J O'Brien; J Rusthoven; A Rocchi; J Latreille; S Fine; T Vandenberg; F Laberge
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1993-08-01       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 7.  [Management of chemotherapy-induced emesis: what is the standard after 20 years of clinical research].

Authors:  A Du Bois
Journal:  Med Klin (Munich)       Date:  1998-01

Review 8.  Reducing chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting. Current perspectives and future possibilities.

Authors:  A Del Favero; F Roila; M Tonato
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 5.606

Review 9.  Treatment of chemotherapy-induced emesis in the 1990s: impact of the 5-HT3 receptor antagonists.

Authors:  P J Hesketh
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 3.603

10.  Granisetron compared with prednisolone plus metopimazine as anti-emetic prophylaxis during multiple cycles of moderately emetogenic chemotherapy.

Authors:  T Sigsgaard; J Herrstedt; L J Andersen; H Havsteen; S W Langer; A G Kjaerbøl; H Lund; M Kjaer; P Dombernowsky
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 7.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.