Literature DB >> 8032701

Inconsistency of prognostic factors for post-chemotherapy nausea and vomiting.

J Pater1, L Slamet, B Zee, D Osoba, D Warr, J Rusthoven.   

Abstract

A number of prognostic factors have been reported to influence the probability of developing nausea and vomiting after cytotoxic chemotherapy. This study used data collected in four randomized anti-emetic trials conducted by the Clinical Trials Group of the National Cancer Institute of Canada (NCIC-CTG) to assess the consistency of the effects of these prognostic factors. A total of 582 patients, all of whom had received moderately emetogenic chemotherapy for the first time, but who were assigned to different anti-emetics, were included in the analysis. The major findings was that the probability of post-chemotherapy nausea and vomiting was much more strongly influenced by the type of chemotherapy given and the type of anti-emetic used than by patient (e.g., age, gender) or environmental (e.g., treatment location, time of administration) characteristics. Further, patient-related factors had different, and sometimes opposite, effects in different anti-emetic and chemotherapy subgroups. Finally, the relative potency of anti-emetics appeared to vary with chemotherapy regimens. Implications of these findings for future studies are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8032701     DOI: 10.1007/bf00417474

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Support Care Cancer        ISSN: 0941-4355            Impact factor:   3.603


  14 in total

1.  Superiority of granisetron to dexamethasone plus prochlorperazine in the prevention of chemotherapy-induced emesis.

Authors:  D Warr; A Willan; S Fine; K Wilson; A Davis; C Erlichman; J Rusthoven; W Lofters; D Osoba; F Laberge
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1991-08-21       Impact factor: 13.506

2.  Antiemetic studies: a methodological discussion.

Authors:  I N Olver; R M Simon; J Aisner
Journal:  Cancer Treat Rep       Date:  1986-05

3.  Comparison of dexamethasone and ondansetron in the prophylaxis of emesis induced by moderately emetogenic chemotherapy.

Authors:  A L Jones; A S Hill; M Soukop; A W Hutcheon; J Cassidy; S B Kaye; K Sikora; D N Carney; D Cunningham
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1991-08-24       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  A prospective, randomized double-blind trial comparing metoclopramide alone with metoclopramide plus dexamethasone in preventing emesis induced by high-dose cisplatin.

Authors:  P M Parikh; B S Charak; S D Banavali; S B Koppikar; N Giri; P Nadkarni; T K Saikia; R Gopal; S H Advani
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1988-11-15       Impact factor: 6.860

5.  Failure of methylprednisolone acetate to prolong the antinauseant effect of intravenous methylprednisolone sodium succinate in patients receiving chemotherapy.

Authors:  D Osoba; C Erlichman; A R Willan; M L Brigden; P Geggie; J L Pater; J J Rusthoven; K S Wilson
Journal:  Clin Invest Med       Date:  1988-10       Impact factor: 0.825

6.  The course of nausea and vomiting after high-dose cyclophosphamide.

Authors:  J H Fetting; L B Grochow; M F Folstein; D S Ettinger; M Colvin
Journal:  Cancer Treat Rep       Date:  1982-07

7.  Superiority of methylprednisolone sodium succinate over low dose metoclopramide hydrochloride in the prevention of nausea and vomiting produced by cancer chemotherapy.

Authors:  D Osoba; C Erlichman; A R Willan; M Levitt; J L Pater
Journal:  Clin Invest Med       Date:  1986-11       Impact factor: 0.825

8.  Antiemetic activity of high doses of metoclopramide combined with methylprednisolone versus metoclopramide alone in cisplatin-treated cancer patients: a randomized double-blind trial of the Italian Oncology Group for Clinical Research.

Authors:  F Roila; M Tonato; C Basurto; M Bella; R Passalacqua; D Morsia; F DiCostanzo; D Donati; E Ballatori; G Tognoni
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1987-01       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Testing for qualitative interactions between treatment effects and patient subsets.

Authors:  M Gail; R Simon
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1985-06       Impact factor: 2.571

10.  A randomized, double-blinded study comparing six doses of batanopride (BMY-25801) with methylprednisolone in patients receiving moderately emetogenic chemotherapy.

Authors:  J Rusthoven; J Pater; L Kaizer; K Wilson; D Osoba; J Latreille; B Findlay; W S Lofters; D Warr; F Laberge
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 32.976

View more
  8 in total

Review 1.  Standard treatment of chemotherapy-induced emesis.

Authors:  D Warr
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 3.603

2.  A prospective, observational, multicenter study on risk factors and prophylaxis for low emetic risk chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting.

Authors:  Toshinobu Hayashi; Mototsugu Shimokawa; Takanori Miyoshi; Yoko Toriyama; Chiaki Yokota; Jun Taniguchi; Kiyonori Hanada; Kyouichi Tsumagari; Noriko Okubo; Yoshimichi Koutake; Kohei Sakata; Yosei Kawamata; Takashi Goto; Yasufumi Tsurusaki; Makiko Koyabu
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2017-03-24       Impact factor: 3.603

3.  Risk factors at pretreatment predicting treatment-induced nausea and vomiting in Australian cancer patients: a prospective, longitudinal, observational study.

Authors:  Carlo Pirri; Paul Katris; James Trotter; Evan Bayliss; Robert Bennett; Peter Drummond
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2010-09-03       Impact factor: 3.603

4.  Incidence of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in Taiwan: physicians' and nurses' estimation vs. patients' reported outcomes.

Authors:  Chi-Ting Liau; Nei-Min Chu; Hsueh-Erh Liu; Robert Deuson; Jade Lien; Jen-Shi Chen
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2005-03-16       Impact factor: 3.603

5.  Current applications of health-related quality-of-life assessment in oncology.

Authors:  D Osoba
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 3.603

6.  FLOT (a chemotherapy regimen for gastric/esophagogastric junction cancer): to be treated as a highly emetogenic regimen or a moderately emetogenic one? Comparison of the emetogenic potential of FLOT versus FOLFOX and TAC regimens.

Authors:  Marziyeh Ghorbani; Mehdi Dehghani; Noushin Fahimfar; Soha Namazi; Ali Dehshahri
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2022-01-17       Impact factor: 3.603

7.  Risk factors for delayed chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting with low-emetic-risk chemotherapy: a prospective, observational, multicenter study.

Authors:  Toshinobu Hayashi; Mototsugu Shimokawa; Koichi Matsuo; Takanori Miyoshi; Yoko Toriyama; Chiaki Yokota; Jun Taniguchi; Kiyonori Hanada; Kyouichi Tsumagari; Noriko Okubo; Yoshimichi Koutake; Kohei Sakata; Yosei Kawamata; Takashi Goto; Yasufumi Tsurusaki; Makiko Koyabu
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2018-10-04       Impact factor: 3.989

8.  Pooled analysis of combination antiemetic therapy for chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in patients with colorectal cancer treated with oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy of moderate emetic risk.

Authors:  Mototsugu Shimokawa; Toshinobu Hayashi; Junichi Nishimura; Taroh Satoh; Mutsumi Fukunaga; Reiko Matsui; Yasushi Tsuji; Fumitaka Mizuki; Takahiro Kogawa
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2021-10-16       Impact factor: 4.430

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.