Literature DB >> 16533276

End-to-end electronic control of the hospital transfusion process to increase the safety of blood transfusion: strengths and weaknesses.

Amanda Davies1, Julie Staves, Jonathan Kay, Angela Casbard, Michael F Murphy.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Incorrect blood component transfused is a frequent serious incident associated with transfusion and often involves misidentification of the patient and/or the unit of blood. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: This study extended the evaluation of an electronic system involving bar code technology and handheld computers. Electronic control of collection of blood from blood refrigerators was incorporated into a previously described process for blood sample collection and blood administration. Practice was evaluated before and after its introduction in cardiac surgery.
RESULTS: The baseline audits revealed poor practice. Significant improvements were found following the introduction of the electronic system, including from 8 percent to 100 percent in checking that the blood group and unit number on the blood pack matched the compatibility label and the pack was in date (p < or = 0.0001). Similar significant improvements were found in blood sample collection, the collection of blood from blood refrigerators, and the documentation of transfusion. Staff found the system easy to operate and preferred it to standard procedures.
CONCLUSIONS: A bar code patient identification system improved transfusion practice, although areas for improvement were identified. These results provide support for further work on the development of such systems for both transfusion and other procedures requiring patient identification.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16533276     DOI: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2006.00729.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transfusion        ISSN: 0041-1132            Impact factor:   3.157


  8 in total

1.  Technologies to reduce errors in dispensing and administration of medication in hospitals: clinical and economic analyses.

Authors: 
Journal:  CADTH Technol Overv       Date:  2010-09-01

2.  Performance Evaluation of Automated Immunohematology Analyzer IH-500 for Blood Bank Testing.

Authors:  Sang Hyuk Park; Jaewook Kim; Ji-Hun Lim; Joseph Jeong; Seon-Ho Lee
Journal:  Indian J Hematol Blood Transfus       Date:  2019-05-02       Impact factor: 0.900

3.  Use of an identification system based on biometric data for patients requiring transfusions guarantees transfusion safety and traceability.

Authors:  Francesco Bennardello; Carmelo Fidone; Sergio Cabibbo; Salvatore Calabrese; Giovanni Garozzo; Grazia Cassarino; Agostino Antolino; Giuseppe Tavolino; Nuccio Zisa; Cadigia Falla; Giuseppe Drago; Giovanna Di Stefano; Pietro Bonomo
Journal:  Blood Transfus       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 3.443

4.  Virtual blood bank.

Authors:  Kit Fai Wong
Journal:  J Pathol Inform       Date:  2011-01-24

5.  Can mHealth improve access to safe blood for transfusion during obstetric emergency?

Authors:  Aminur Rahman; Sadika Akhter; Monjura Khatun Nisha; Syed Shariful Islam; Fatema Ashraf; Monjur Rahman; Nazneen Begum; Mahbub Elahi Chowdhury; Anne Austin; Iqbal Anwar
Journal:  Int J Womens Health       Date:  2017-04-20

6.  Comparative Analysis of Clinical Samples Showing Weak Serum Reaction on AutoVue System Causing ABO Blood Typing Discrepancies.

Authors:  Su Yeon Jo; Ju Mi Lee; Hye Lim Kim; Kyeong Hwa Sin; Hyeon Ji Lee; Chulhun Ludgerus Chang; Hyung Hoi Kim
Journal:  Ann Lab Med       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 3.464

Review 7.  Serious Hazards of Transfusion (SHOT) haemovigilance and progress is improving transfusion safety.

Authors:  Paula H B Bolton-Maggs; Hannah Cohen
Journal:  Br J Haematol       Date:  2013-09-14       Impact factor: 6.998

8.  A novel approach to bedside pretransfusion identity check of blood and its components: the Sandesh Positive-Negative protocol.

Authors:  Sandesh Udupi; Kriti Puri
Journal:  Korean J Anesthesiol       Date:  2019-12-04
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.