Literature DB >> 16530635

Musculoskeletal imaging at 3T: current techniques and future applications.

Timothy J Mosher1.   

Abstract

MSK MR imaging applications are making the transition rapidly from 1.5T to 3T. Initial experience in the knee suggests that the higher SNR provides technical improvement in routine clinical imaging with the potential for greater accuracy in the diagnosis of articular cartilage injury. Similarly, initial experience with 3T MR imaging in the evaluation of the hip and small joints of the hand and wrist has been positive. In other joints, clinical development has been limited by the lack of availability of dedicated surface coils, and sensitivity of 3TMR imaging to artifact. The clinical impact of this technology remains uncertain because no published controlled clinical trial has evaluated the impact of 3T MR imaging on diagnostic outcomes. In addition to clinical application, 3T MR imaging has an important role for furthering translational research in MSK diseases through the development of new molecular and functional MR imaging techniques.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16530635     DOI: 10.1016/j.mric.2005.12.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am        ISSN: 1064-9689            Impact factor:   2.266


  25 in total

1.  Analysis of tunnel widening after double-bundle ACL reconstruction.

Authors:  Yong Seuk Lee; Sheen-Woo Lee; Shin Woo Nam; Won Seok Oh; Jae Ang Sim; Ji Hoon Kwak; Beom Koo Lee
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-01-15       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 2.  Diagnosis of rotator cuff tears using 3-Tesla MRI versus 3-Tesla MRA: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ciaran McGarvey; Ziad Harb; Christian Smith; Russell Houghton; Steven Corbett; Adil Ajuied
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2015-12-03       Impact factor: 2.199

3.  MR imaging of the human hand and wrist at 7 T.

Authors:  Björn Behr; Jörg Stadler; Henrik J Michaely; Hans-Georg Damert; Wolfgang Schneider
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2009-03-10       Impact factor: 2.199

4.  Comparison of image quality in magnetic resonance imaging of the knee at 1.5 and 3.0 Tesla using 32-channel receiver coils.

Authors:  F Schoth; N Kraemer; T Niendorf; C Hohl; R W Gunther; G A Krombach
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2008-05-08       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  3 T magnetic resonance imaging of the musculoskeletal system.

Authors:  G Guglielmi; N Biccari; F Mangano; R Toffanin
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2010-02-22       Impact factor: 3.469

6.  Diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging and magnetic resonance arthrography of the hip is dependent on specialist training of the radiologist.

Authors:  Ciara M McGuire; Peter MacMahon; Damien P Byrne; Eoin Kavanagh; Kevin J Mulhall
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2011-09-14       Impact factor: 2.199

7.  Ligaments of the Lisfranc joint in MRI: 3D-SPACE (sampling perfection with application optimized contrasts using different flip-angle evolution) sequence compared to three orthogonal proton-density fat-saturated (PD fs) sequences.

Authors:  Erika J Ulbrich; Veronika Zubler; Reto Sutter; Norman Espinosa; Christian W Pfirrmann; Marco Zanetti
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2012-08-23       Impact factor: 2.199

8.  Imaging and T2 relaxometry of short-T2 connective tissues in the knee using ultrashort echo-time double-echo steady-state (UTEDESS).

Authors:  Akshay S Chaudhari; Bragi Sveinsson; Catherine J Moran; Emily J McWalter; Ethan M Johnson; Tao Zhang; Garry E Gold; Brian A Hargreaves
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2017-01-11       Impact factor: 4.668

9.  Initial results of in vivo high-resolution morphological and biochemical cartilage imaging of patients after matrix-associated autologous chondrocyte transplantation (MACT) of the ankle.

Authors:  Sebastian Quirbach; Siegfried Trattnig; Stefan Marlovits; Valentin Zimmermann; Stephan Domayer; Ronald Dorotka; Tallal C Mamisch; Klaus Bohndorf; Goetz H Welsch
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2009-03-19       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 10.  Novel contrast mechanisms at 3 Tesla and 7 Tesla.

Authors:  Ravinder R Regatte; Mark E Schweitzer
Journal:  Semin Musculoskelet Radiol       Date:  2008-10-10       Impact factor: 1.777

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.