Literature DB >> 16530619

Racial differences in colorectal cancer test use by Medicare consumers.

Anna P Schenck1, Carrie N Klabunde, William W Davis.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Lower use of colorectal cancer (CRC) screening has been suggested as a factor in higher rates of CRC incidence and mortality among African Americans. Racial differences in colorectal cancer test use are not well understood.
METHODS: The study sample included respondents aged 50 to 80 to a 2001 telephone survey of Medicare consumers from two states. The analyses, initiated in 2004, were limited to respondents with no history of CRC (n = 1901). Three CRC tests were examined: fecal occult blood tests (FOBTs), sigmoidoscopy, and colonoscopy. Type of testing and testing according to Medicare coverage intervals by race were compared. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were obtained from unadjusted and adjusted models to assess the independent associations between race and test use.
RESULTS: Adherence to the Medicare-covered intervals for CRC tests was low (56.8% for whites, 39.1% for African Americans), and did not significantly differ by race after adjustment. African Americans were, however, significantly less likely to have ever been tested (OR = 0.48, 95% CI = 0.33-0.70) and more likely to have had an endoscopic test than an FOBT (OR = 3.06, 95% CI = 1.70-5.51).
CONCLUSIONS: The type of test used to screen for colorectal cancer has important implications for compliance with recommended screening intervals. Understanding reasons for racial differences in CRC test use may help identify approaches to increasing test use in the Medicare population.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16530619     DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2005.11.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Prev Med        ISSN: 0749-3797            Impact factor:   5.043


  17 in total

1.  Overcoming poor attendance to first scheduled colonoscopy: a randomized trial of peer coach or brochure support.

Authors:  Barbara J Turner; Mark Weiner; Sheila D Berry; Karen Lillie; Kevin Fosnocht; Christopher S Hollenbeak
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2007-11-21       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  Factors that increase risk of colon polyps.

Authors:  Sarah W Grahn; Madhulika G Varma
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2008-11

3.  Colonoscopy screening in African Americans and Whites with affected first-degree relatives.

Authors:  Harvey J Murff; Neeraja B Peterson; Jay H Fowke; Margaret Hargreaves; Lisa B Signorello; Robert S Dittus; Wei Zheng; William J Blot
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2008-03-24

4.  Socioeconomic and physician supply determinants of racial disparities in colorectal cancer screening.

Authors:  Samir Soneji; Katrina Armstrong; David A Asch
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2012-07-03       Impact factor: 3.840

5.  Trends in self-reported health care provider recommendations for colorectal cancer screening by race.

Authors:  Shayna E Rich; Fatmatta M Kuyateh; Diane M Dwyer; Carmela Groves; Eileen K Steinberger
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2011-06-12       Impact factor: 4.018

6.  Racial and ethnic trends of colorectal cancer screening among Medicare enrollees.

Authors:  Chyke A Doubeni; Adeyinka O Laiyemo; Carrie N Klabunde; Angela C Young; Terry S Field; Robert H Fletcher
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 5.043

7.  Colorectal endoscopy, advanced adenomas, and sessile serrated polyps: implications for proximal colon cancer.

Authors:  Andrea N Burnett-Hartman; Polly A Newcomb; Amanda I Phipps; Michael N Passarelli; William M Grady; Melissa P Upton; Lee-Ching Zhu; John D Potter
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-06-12       Impact factor: 10.864

8.  Predictors of colorectal cancer testing using the California Health Inventory Survey.

Authors:  Alexandra Modiri; Kian Makipour; Javier Gomez; Frank Friedenberg
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-02-28       Impact factor: 5.742

9.  Improving colorectal cancer screening by using community volunteers: results of the Carolinas cancer education and screening (CARES) project.

Authors:  Mira L Katz; Cathy Tatum; Stephanie L Dickinson; David M Murray; Kristie Long-Foley; M Robert Cooper; Morgan Daven; Electra D Paskett
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2007-10-01       Impact factor: 6.860

10.  Racial/ethnic variation in the anatomic subsite location of in situ and invasive cancers of the colon.

Authors:  Vickie L Shavers
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 1.798

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.