Literature DB >> 16530428

Phonetic processing areas revealed by sinewave speech and acoustically similar non-speech.

Randall R Benson1, Matthew Richardson, D H Whalen, Song Lai.   

Abstract

The neural substrates underlying speech perception are still not well understood. Previously, we found dissociation of speech and nonspeech processing at the earliest cortical level (AI), using speech and nonspeech complexity dimensions. Acoustic differences between speech and nonspeech stimuli in imaging studies, however, confound the search for linguistic-phonetic regions. Presently, we used sinewave speech (SWsp) and nonspeech (SWnon), which replace speech formants with sinewave tones, in order to match acoustic spectral and temporal complexity while contrasting phonetics. Chord progressions (CP) were used to remove the effects of auditory coherence and object processing. Twelve normal RH volunteers were scanned with fMRI while listening to SWsp, SWnon, CP, and a baseline condition arranged in blocks. Only two brain regions, in bilateral superior temporal sulcus, extending more posteriorly on the left, were found to prefer the SWsp condition after accounting for acoustic modulation and coherence effects. Two regions responded preferentially to the more frequency-modulated stimuli, including one that overlapped the right temporal phonetic area and another in the left angular gyrus far from the phonetic area. These findings are proposed to form the basis for the two subtypes of auditory word deafness. Several brain regions, including auditory and non-auditory areas, preferred the coherent auditory stimuli and are likely involved in auditory object recognition. The design of the current study allowed for separation of acoustic spectrotemporal, object recognition, and phonetic effects resulting in distinct and overlapping components.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16530428     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.11.029

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  20 in total

1.  Speech versus song: multiple pitch-sensitive areas revealed by a naturally occurring musical illusion.

Authors:  Adam Tierney; Fred Dick; Diana Deutsch; Marty Sereno
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2012-02-07       Impact factor: 5.357

2.  Abstract coding of audiovisual speech: beyond sensory representation.

Authors:  Uri Hasson; Jeremy I Skipper; Howard C Nusbaum; Steven L Small
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2007-12-20       Impact factor: 17.173

Review 3.  A review and synthesis of the first 20 years of PET and fMRI studies of heard speech, spoken language and reading.

Authors:  Cathy J Price
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2012-05-12       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  Semantic and acoustic analysis of speech by functional networks with distinct time scales.

Authors:  Siyi Deng; Ramesh Srinivasan
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2010-05-16       Impact factor: 3.252

5.  Visual phonetic processing localized using speech and nonspeech face gestures in video and point-light displays.

Authors:  Lynne E Bernstein; Jintao Jiang; Dimitrios Pantazis; Zhong-Lin Lu; Anand Joshi
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2010-09-17       Impact factor: 5.038

6.  Localization of sublexical speech perception components.

Authors:  Peter E Turkeltaub; H Branch Coslett
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2010-04-21       Impact factor: 2.381

7.  Phonological repetition-suppression in bilateral superior temporal sulci.

Authors:  Kenneth I Vaden; L Tugan Muftuler; Gregory Hickok
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2009-08-03       Impact factor: 6.556

8.  Functional overlap between regions involved in speech perception and in monitoring one's own voice during speech production.

Authors:  Zane Z Zheng; Kevin G Munhall; Ingrid S Johnsrude
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 3.225

9.  Common neural substrates support speech and non-speech vocal tract gestures.

Authors:  Soo-Eun Chang; Mary Kay Kenney; Torrey M J Loucks; Christopher J Poletto; Christy L Ludlow
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2009-03-25       Impact factor: 6.556

10.  A comparison of five fMRI protocols for mapping speech comprehension systems.

Authors:  Jeffrey R Binder; Sara J Swanson; Thomas A Hammeke; David S Sabsevitz
Journal:  Epilepsia       Date:  2008-05-29       Impact factor: 5.864

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.