Literature DB >> 20580635

Semantic and acoustic analysis of speech by functional networks with distinct time scales.

Siyi Deng1, Ramesh Srinivasan.   

Abstract

Speech perception requires the successful interpretation of both phonetic and syllabic information in the auditory signal. It has been suggested by Poeppel (2003) that phonetic processing requires an optimal time scale of 25 ms while the time scale of syllabic processing is much slower (150-250 ms). To better understand the operation of brain networks at these characteristic time scales during speech perception, we studied the spatial and dynamic properties of EEG responses to five different stimuli: (1) amplitude modulated (AM) speech, (2) AM speech with added broadband noise, (3) AM reversed speech, (4) AM broadband noise, and (5) AM pure tone. Amplitude modulation at gamma band frequencies (40 Hz) elicited steady-state auditory evoked responses (SSAERs) bilaterally over primary auditory cortices. Reduced SSAERs were observed over the left auditory cortex only for stimuli containing speech. In addition, we found over the left hemisphere, anterior to primary auditory cortex, a network whose instantaneous frequencies in the theta to alpha band (4-16 Hz) are correlated with the amplitude envelope of the speech signal. This correlation was not observed for reversed speech. The presence of speech in the sound input activates a 4-16 Hz envelope tracking network and suppresses the 40-Hz gamma band network which generates the steady-state responses over the left auditory cortex. We believe these findings to be consistent with the idea that processing of the speech signals involves preferentially processing at syllabic time scales rather than phonetic time scales. Copyright 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20580635      PMCID: PMC4012024          DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2010.05.027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Res        ISSN: 0006-8993            Impact factor:   3.252


  29 in total

1.  Speech comprehension is correlated with temporal response patterns recorded from auditory cortex.

Authors:  E Ahissar; S Nagarajan; M Ahissar; A Protopapas; H Mahncke; M M Merzenich
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-11-06       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Oscillatory gamma activity in humans and its role in object representation.

Authors: 
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 20.229

Review 3.  Dorsal and ventral streams: a framework for understanding aspects of the functional anatomy of language.

Authors:  Gregory Hickok; David Poeppel
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2004 May-Jun

Review 4.  EMG and EOG artifacts in brain computer interface systems: A survey.

Authors:  Mehrdad Fatourechi; Ali Bashashati; Rabab K Ward; Gary E Birch
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2006-12-13       Impact factor: 3.708

5.  Phase patterns of neuronal responses reliably discriminate speech in human auditory cortex.

Authors:  Huan Luo; David Poeppel
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2007-06-21       Impact factor: 17.173

6.  Distinct gamma-band evoked responses to speech and non-speech sounds in humans.

Authors:  Satu Palva; J Matias Palva; Yury Shtyrov; Teija Kujala; Risto J Ilmoniemi; Kai Kaila; Risto Näätänen
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2002-02-15       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Receptive fields and functional architecture of monkey striate cortex.

Authors:  D H Hubel; T N Wiesel
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1968-03       Impact factor: 5.182

8.  A 40-Hz auditory potential recorded from the human scalp.

Authors:  R Galambos; S Makeig; P J Talmachoff
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1981-04       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Human oscillatory brain activity near 40 Hz coexists with cognitive temporal binding.

Authors:  M Joliot; U Ribary; R Llinás
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1994-11-22       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 10.  Human auditory steady-state responses.

Authors:  Terence W Picton; M Sasha John; Andrew Dimitrijevic; David Purcell
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 2.117

View more
  8 in total

1.  The neuromagnetic response to spoken sentences: co-modulation of theta band amplitude and phase.

Authors:  Mary F Howard; David Poeppel
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2012-02-21       Impact factor: 6.556

2.  Crosslinguistic application of English-centric rhythm descriptors in motor speech disorders.

Authors:  Julie M Liss; Rene Utianski; Kaitlin Lansford
Journal:  Folia Phoniatr Logop       Date:  2013-05-28       Impact factor: 0.849

3.  Envelope responses in single-trial EEG indicate attended speaker in a 'cocktail party'.

Authors:  Cort Horton; Ramesh Srinivasan; Michael D'Zmura
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2014-06-25       Impact factor: 5.379

4.  Suppression of competing speech through entrainment of cortical oscillations.

Authors:  Cort Horton; Michael D'Zmura; Ramesh Srinivasan
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2013-03-20       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  The Auditory-Brainstem Response to Continuous, Non-repetitive Speech Is Modulated by the Speech Envelope and Reflects Speech Processing.

Authors:  Chagit S Reichenbach; Chananel Braiman; Nicholas D Schiff; A J Hudspeth; Tobias Reichenbach
Journal:  Front Comput Neurosci       Date:  2016-05-26       Impact factor: 2.380

6.  Familiarity Affects Entrainment of EEG in Music Listening.

Authors:  Yuiko Kumagai; Mahnaz Arvaneh; Toshihisa Tanaka
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2017-07-26       Impact factor: 3.169

7.  Auditory steady state responses elicited by silent gaps embedded within a broadband noise.

Authors:  Seiichi Kadowaki; Takashi Morimoto; Hidehiko Okamoto
Journal:  BMC Neurosci       Date:  2022-05-06       Impact factor: 3.264

8.  The steady-state response of the cerebral cortex to the beat of music reflects both the comprehension of music and attention.

Authors:  Benjamin Meltzer; Chagit S Reichenbach; Chananel Braiman; Nicholas D Schiff; A J Hudspeth; Tobias Reichenbach
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2015-08-06       Impact factor: 3.169

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.