Literature DB >> 15082943

Variation in intake of sweet and bitter solutions by inbred strains of golden hamsters.

Marion E Frank1, Yumiko Wada, Junshiro Makino, Makoto Mizutani, Hidehiko Umezawa, Yasutomi Katsuie, Thomas P Hettinger, David A Blizard.   

Abstract

Variation in intake of sweet and bitter solutions by inbred strains of laboratory mice has helped identify genes related to taste behaviors; but similar information is not available for golden hamsters (Mesocricetus auratus ), a species used much in taste research. Thus, 6-hour, 1-bottle intake by water-replete hamsters of 7 inbred strains was measured for water and 2 concentrations of sucrose, maltose, D-phenylalanine (D-Phe), and sodium saccharin, which are sweet; and quinine.HCl, L-phenylalanine (L-Phe), caffeine, and sucrose octaacetate (SOA), which are bitter to humans. Difference scores (DIF), calculated as solution intake minus mean baseline water intake (mL) for each animal, were evaluated by analysis of variance. Compared to ACN, CN, APA, APG, and CBN, five strains with similar DIF for all compounds, GN, an ancestral strain of ACNT, and ACNT preferred sucrose, caffeine, and SOA more strongly; ACNT also preferred saccharin and maltose more strongly and rejected quinine more strongly. Narrow sense heritabilities for the 6 compounds for which strain differences were revealed ranged from 0.31 to 0.57. Genetic correlations indicated the strain variations in intake of sucrose, saccharin, SOA, and caffeine were coupled; a statistical association with several possible interpretations. Intakes of the two amino acids, preferred D-Phe and aversive L-Phe, did not reveal strain differences, and heritability ranged from 0.13 to 0.23 for the two optical isomers. Thus, although, compared to mice, genetic variation in laboratory hamsters may be small, genetic differences that influence taste behaviors in existing strains may help identify relevant genes. Copyright 2004 Plenum Publishing Corporation

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15082943     DOI: 10.1023/B:BEGE.0000023651.99481.d5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Genet        ISSN: 0001-8244            Impact factor:   2.805


  8 in total

Review 1.  Taste receptor genes.

Authors:  Alexander A Bachmanov; Gary K Beauchamp
Journal:  Annu Rev Nutr       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 11.848

2.  Role of caloric homeostasis and reward in alcohol intake in Syrian golden hamsters.

Authors:  Danielle Gulick; Alan I Green
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2010-08-03

3.  Genetics of sweet taste preferences.

Authors:  Alexander A Bachmanov; Natalia P Bosak; Wely B Floriano; Masashi Inoue; Xia Li; Cailu Lin; Vladimir O Murovets; Danielle R Reed; Vasily A Zolotarev; Gary K Beauchamp
Journal:  Flavour Fragr J       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 2.576

4.  Cycloheximide: no ordinary bitter stimulus.

Authors:  Thomas P Hettinger; Bradley K Formaker; Marion E Frank
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2007-02-23       Impact factor: 3.332

Review 5.  Cracking taste codes by tapping into sensory neuron impulse traffic.

Authors:  Marion E Frank; Robert F Lundy; Robert J Contreras
Journal:  Prog Neurobiol       Date:  2008-09-07       Impact factor: 11.685

6.  Heritability and genetic covariation of sensitivity to PROP, SOA, quinine HCl, and caffeine.

Authors:  Jonathan L Hansen; Danielle R Reed; Margaret J Wright; Nicholas G Martin; Paul A S Breslin
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2006-03-09       Impact factor: 3.160

Review 7.  The Taste of Caffeine.

Authors:  Rachel L Poole; Michael G Tordoff
Journal:  J Caffeine Res       Date:  2017-06-01

Review 8.  Behavioral genetics and taste.

Authors:  John D Boughter; Alexander A Bachmanov
Journal:  BMC Neurosci       Date:  2007-09-18       Impact factor: 3.288

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.