Literature DB >> 16523226

Hemodynamic instability after extracranial carotid stenting.

G Pappadà1, E Beghi, R Marina, E Agostoni, C Cesana, F Legnani, M Parolin, D Petri, E P Sganzerla.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Hemodynamic instability (hypertension, hypotension and bradycardia) is a well-known complication of carotid endarterectomy. Carotid angioplasty and stenting (CAS) is becoming a valuable alternative treatment for patients with severe carotid stenosis and increased surgical risk. CAS implies instrumentation of the carotid bulb, so baroceptor dysfunction may provoke hemodynamic instability. The aim of this work was to calculate the incidence of this complication and to detect factors to predict it.
METHODS: Medical records and angiograms of 51 consecutive patients submitted to CAS for severe atherosclerotic stenosis (40 cases) or postsurgical restenosis (11 cases) were retrospectively reviewed in order to detect the occurrence of intra- and post-procedural hypertension (systolic blood pressure >160 mmHg), hypotension (systolic blood pressure <90 mmHg) and bradycardia (heart rate <60 beats/min). The relationship between clinical, procedural and angiographic factors and the occurrence of hemodynamic instability was assessed with univariate and multivariate analysis (logistic regression).
RESULTS: Transient mild systolic post-procedural hypertension occurred in five cases (10%); preprocedural hypertension, asymptomatic stenosis and ipsilateral post-surgical restenosis predicted this. Hypotension with bradycardia also occurred in five cases (10%), one with neurological sequelae. Transient periprocedural bradycardia occurred in 19 cases (37%). Severe bradycardia without hypotension arose in one case only. Factors predicting post-procedural hypotension included the presence of a fibrous plaque and the ratio between the pre- and post-stenting diameter of the internal carotid artery. Peri-procedural bradycardia predicted post-procedural bradycardia. None of these factors were confirmed by multivariate analysis as a significant prognostic predictor.
CONCLUSION: Mild systolic hypertension may occur after CAS, but is resolved by medical treatment. Prolonged hypotension and bradycardia may also arise and this can be dangerous because it may cause neurological deterioration due to hypoperfusion. These complications cannot be predicted by clinical, procedural, and angiographic factors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16523226     DOI: 10.1007/s00701-006-0752-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)        ISSN: 0001-6268            Impact factor:   2.216


  9 in total

1.  Can periprocedural hypotension in carotid artery stenting be predicted? A carotid morphologic autonomic pathologic scoring model using virtual histology to anticipate hypotension.

Authors:  A Tsurumi; S Miyachi; O Hososhima; T Izumi; T Ohshima; N Matsubara; T Kinkori; T Naito; T Wakabayashi
Journal:  Interv Neuroradiol       Date:  2009-04-15       Impact factor: 1.610

2.  Short and Long-Term Effect of Carotid Artery Stenting on Arterial Blood Pressure Measured through Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring.

Authors:  Erkan Köklü; İsa Öner Yüksel; Şakir Arslan; Nermin Bayar; Fatma Köklü; Serkan Çay; Göksel Çağırcı; Selçuk Küçükseymen; Görkem Kuş
Journal:  Acta Cardiol Sin       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 2.672

3.  The association of clinical variables and filter design with carotid artery stenting thirty-day outcome.

Authors:  G M Siewiorek; R T Krafty; M H Wholey; E A Finol
Journal:  Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg       Date:  2011-04-29       Impact factor: 7.069

4.  Hemodynamic instability during carotid angioplasty and stenting-relationship of calcified plaque and its characteristics.

Authors:  Jin Sue Jeon; Seung Hun Sheen; Gyojun Hwang
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2013-03-01       Impact factor: 2.759

5.  Predictors and timing of hypotension and bradycardia after carotid artery stenting.

Authors:  P Lavoie; J Rutledge; M A Dawoud; M Mazumdar; H Riina; Y P Gobin
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2008-08-21       Impact factor: 3.825

6.  Haemodynamic depression during carotid angioplasty and stenting.

Authors:  Katarzyna Widecka-Ostrowska; Andrzej Modrzejewski; Jarosław Gorący
Journal:  Pol J Radiol       Date:  2010-10

7.  Complications and Predictors of Hypotension Requiring Vasopressor after Carotid Artery Stenting.

Authors:  Masataka Nanto; Yudai Goto; Hiroyuki Yamamoto; Seisuke Tanigawa; Hayato Takeuchi; Yoshikazu Nakahara; Hiroshi Tenjin; Michiko Takado
Journal:  Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo)       Date:  2017-01-31       Impact factor: 1.742

8.  The safety and efficacy of the Mo.Ma system device for carotid artery stenting: A single-center experience from Taiwan.

Authors:  Cheng-Chung Cheng; Chin-Sheng Lin; Wei-Hsian Yin; Chin Lin; I-Fan Liu; Yu-Feng Lee; Wei-Ting Liu; Hao-Neng Fu; Chien-Lung Huang; Tien-Ping Tsao
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-09-15

9.  The correlation between the cardiovascular instability and the size of the developed ischaemic lesions in patients who underwent carotid stenting.

Authors:  Sándor Csizmadia; Zsófia Kaszás; Róbert Klucsai; Éva Bartha; Erika Vörös
Journal:  Neuroradiol J       Date:  2021-01-21
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.