Literature DB >> 21530332

The association of clinical variables and filter design with carotid artery stenting thirty-day outcome.

G M Siewiorek1, R T Krafty, M H Wholey, E A Finol.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Patient and device selection are important for the success of carotid artery stenting (CAS). We hypothesize that distal protection filter (DPF) design characteristics that minimize blood flow resistance and maximize capture efficiency are associated with the absence of transient ischemic attack (TIA), stroke and neurologic-related death after 30 days.
METHODS: Records from 208 patients were reviewed retrospectively. Filter design characteristics were quantified previously in our laboratory. The association between risk factors and design characteristics with 30-day outcome was quantified using univariate analysis.
RESULTS: The 30-day all-cause stroke and death rate was 8.7% (asymptomatic: 7.7%, symptomatic: 10.6%). Five DPFs were used in the study: Accunet (41.3%), Angioguard (33.2%), FilterWire (24%), Emboshield (1%), and Spider (.5%). Diabetes (P = .04) and prior carotid endarterectomy (CEA, P = .03) were associated with adverse outcome. Prior stroke (P = .01) and prior CEA (P = .04) were significant for peri-procedural stroke. Design characteristics such as capture efficiency were associated with favorable outcomes.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients with prior CEA or stroke are more likely to have unfavorable CAS outcomes after 30 days. Filters with high capture efficiency may yield the best clinical results. Analysis of the effect of design characteristics on CAS outcome should aid the design of future devices.
Copyright © 2011 European Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21530332      PMCID: PMC3157584          DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2011.04.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg        ISSN: 1078-5884            Impact factor:   7.069


  33 in total

1.  Effects of stent design parameters on normal artery wall mechanics.

Authors:  Julian Bedoya; Clark A Meyer; Lucas H Timmins; Michael R Moreno; James E Moore
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 2.097

2.  Carotid stenting with distal protection in high surgical risk patients: the BEACH trial 30 day results.

Authors:  Christopher J White; Sriram S Iyer; L Nelson Hopkins; Barry T Katzen; Mary E Russell
Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 2.692

3.  Protected carotid stenting in high-surgical-risk patients: the ARCHeR results.

Authors:  William A Gray; L Nelson Hopkins; Sanjay Yadav; Thomas Davis; Mark Wholey; Richard Atkinson; Alberto Cremonesi; Ronald Fairman; Gary Walker; Patrick Verta; Jeff Popma; Renu Virmani; David J Cohen
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 4.268

4.  Do device characteristics impact outcome in carotid artery stenting?

Authors:  Joseph P Hart; Patrick Peeters; Jurgen Verbist; Koen Deloose; Marc Bosiers
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 4.268

5.  Prediction of prolonged postprocedural hypotension after carotid artery stenting.

Authors:  Tadashi Nonaka; Shinichi Oka; Kei Miyata; Takeshi Mikami; Izumi Koyanagi; Kiyohiro Houkin; Kazuhisa Yoshifuji; Toshio Imaizumi
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 4.654

6.  Risk score for peri-interventional complications of carotid artery stenting.

Authors:  Robert Hofmann; Alexander Niessner; Alexander Kypta; Clemens Steinwender; Jürgen Kammler; Klaus Kerschner; Michael Grund; Franz Leisch; Kurt Huber
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2006-09-21       Impact factor: 7.914

7.  The capture of visible debris by distal cerebral protection filters during carotid artery stenting: Is it predictable?

Authors:  L Richard Sprouse; Patrick Peeters; Marc Bosiers
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 4.268

8.  Carotid artery stenting is associated with increased complications in octogenarians: 30-day stroke and death rates in the CREST lead-in phase.

Authors:  Robert W Hobson; Virginia J Howard; Gary S Roubin; Thomas G Brott; Robert D Ferguson; Jeffrey J Popma; Darlene L Graham; George Howard
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 4.268

9.  Protected carotid-artery stenting versus endarterectomy in high-risk patients.

Authors:  Jay S Yadav; Mark H Wholey; Richard E Kuntz; Pierre Fayad; Barry T Katzen; Gregory J Mishkel; Tanvir K Bajwa; Patrick Whitlow; Neil E Strickman; Michael R Jaff; Jeffrey J Popma; David B Snead; Donald E Cutlip; Brian G Firth; Kenneth Ouriel
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2004-10-07       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Hemodynamic instability after extracranial carotid stenting.

Authors:  G Pappadà; E Beghi; R Marina; E Agostoni; C Cesana; F Legnani; M Parolin; D Petri; E P Sganzerla
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  2006-03-08       Impact factor: 2.216

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.