Literature DB >> 16518678

Feasibility of using web-based questionnaires in large population-based epidemiological studies.

Alexandra Ekman1, Paul W Dickman, Asa Klint, Elisabete Weiderpass, Jan-Eric Litton.   

Abstract

To date, few large web-based epidemiological studies have been performed in a population-based setting. Sweden has optimal prerequisites for web-based studies with more than 80% of the general population having access to the Internet. Our aim was to investigate (I) response rates in an epidemiological study using primarily the web as a tool for data collection and (II) whether socio-demographic patterns vary between responders to a web and a paper questionnaire. In 2003, we invited 47,859 women to complete a web questionnaire. Two reminders were sent to non-responders; in the first a random sample received a paper questionnaire and in the second the majority received a paper questionnaire. All other non-responders received web questionnaires. Differences in response rates between responders to web and paper questionnaires with regard to socio-demographic and other variables were analyzed, and estimates of the bias introduced by these differences were estimated. In total, 41% of the women responded to the web questionnaire and 31% to the paper questionnaire (overall response rate 72%). The web-, paper- and non-responders respectively did not differ significantly in age, physical activity levels, and body mass index. Women answering web or paper questionnaires had a higher level of education and income and a lower level of smoking than non-responders. The bias associated with collecting information using web questionnaires was not greater than that caused by paper questionnaires. We conclude that web-based questionnaires are a feasible tool for data collection in large population based epidemiological studies in Sweden.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16518678     DOI: 10.1007/s10654-005-6030-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol        ISSN: 0393-2990            Impact factor:   8.082


  18 in total

1.  When to use web-based surveys.

Authors:  J C Wyatt
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2000 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.497

2.  Methods for the design and administration of web-based surveys.

Authors:  T K Schleyer; J L Forrest
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2000 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.497

3.  Test-retest reliability of alcohol measures: is there a difference between internet-based assessment and traditional methods?

Authors:  Elizabeth T Miller; Dan J Neal; Lisa J Roberts; John S Baer; Sally O Cressler; Jane Metrik; G Alan Marlatt
Journal:  Psychol Addict Behav       Date:  2002-03

4.  A comparison of World-Wide Web and paper-and-pencil personality questionnaires.

Authors:  Frances Annie Pettit
Journal:  Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput       Date:  2002-02

5.  Using the Internet to conduct surveys of health professionals: a valid alternative?

Authors:  Dejana Braithwaite; Jon Emery; Simon De Lusignan; Stephen Sutton
Journal:  Fam Pract       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 2.267

6.  An internet-based survey method for college student drinking research.

Authors:  Kypros Kypri; Stephen J Gallagher; Martine L Cashell-Smith
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2004-10-05       Impact factor: 4.492

7.  Biases in internet sexual health samples: comparison of an internet sexuality survey and a national sexual health survey in Sweden.

Authors:  Michael W Ross; Sven-Axel Månsson; Kristian Daneback; Al Cooper; Ronny Tikkanen
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 4.634

8.  Obtaining sensitive data through the Web: an example of design and methods.

Authors:  Atar Baer; Stefan Saroiu; Laura A Koutsky
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 4.822

9.  Methodological variables in Web-based research that may affect results: sample type, monetary incentives, and personal information.

Authors:  K M O'Neil; S D Penrod
Journal:  Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput       Date:  2001-05

10.  Use of the Internet and e-mail for health care information: results from a national survey.

Authors:  Laurence Baker; Todd H Wagner; Sara Singer; M Kate Bundorf
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2003-05-14       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  94 in total

1.  Timing of blood extraction in epidemiologic and proteomic studies: results and proposals from the PANKRAS II Study.

Authors:  Miquel Porta; José Pumarega; Olga Ferrer-Armengou; Tomàs López; Joan Alguacil; Núria Malats; Esteve Fernàndez
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2007-07-18       Impact factor: 8.082

2.  Recent trends in publications in the European Journal of Epidemiology.

Authors:  Albert Hofman
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 8.082

3.  Appropriate epidemiologic methods as a prerequisite for valid study results.

Authors:  Andreas Stang
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2008-11-19       Impact factor: 8.082

Review 4.  Identifying Complementary and Alternative Medicine Usage Information from Internet Resources. A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Vivekanand Sharma; John H Holmes; Indra N Sarkar
Journal:  Methods Inf Med       Date:  2016-06-28       Impact factor: 2.176

5.  Comparison between web-based and paper versions of a self-administered anthropometric questionnaire.

Authors:  Mathilde Touvier; Caroline Méjean; Emmanuelle Kesse-Guyot; Clothilde Pollet; Aurélie Malon; Katia Castetbon; Serge Hercberg
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2010-02-27       Impact factor: 8.082

6.  Use of antimigraine medications and information needs during pregnancy and breastfeeding: a cross-sectional study among 401 Norwegian women.

Authors:  Siri Amundsen; Torunn G Øvrebø; Netta Marie S Amble; Anne Christine Poole; Hedvig Nordeng
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2016-09-13       Impact factor: 2.953

7.  D-amino acid aberrations in cerebrospinal fluid and plasma of smokers.

Authors:  Jurjen J Luykx; Steven C Bakker; Loes van Boxmeer; Christiaan H Vinkers; Hanne E Smeenk; Wouter F Visser; Nanda M Verhoeven-Duif; Eric Strengman; Jacobine E Buizer-Voskamp; Lizzy de Groene; Eric Pa van Dongen; Paul Borgdorff; Peter Bruins; Tom J de Koning; René S Kahn; Roel A Ophoff
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2013-04-24       Impact factor: 7.853

8.  Feasibility of recruiting a birth cohort through the Internet: the experience of the NINFEA cohort.

Authors:  Lorenzo Richiardi; Iacopo Baussano; Loredana Vizzini; Jeroen Douwes; Neil Pearce; Franco Merletti
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2007-10-23       Impact factor: 8.082

9.  Dietary intake of fish, omega-3, omega-6 polyunsaturated fatty acids and vitamin D and the prevalence of psychotic-like symptoms in a cohort of 33,000 women from the general population.

Authors:  Maria Hedelin; Marie Löf; Marita Olsson; Tommy Lewander; Björn Nilsson; Christina M Hultman; Elisabete Weiderpass
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2010-05-26       Impact factor: 3.630

10.  Feasibility of internet-based health-related quality of life data collection in a large patient cohort.

Authors:  Sacha Bhinder; Noori Chowdhury; John Granton; Murray Krahn; D Elizabeth Tullis; Thomas K Waddell; Lianne G Singer
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2010-08-19       Impact factor: 5.428

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.