Literature DB >> 9180492

Microbial colonization of closed-system suction catheters used in liver transplant patients.

D H Adams1, M Hughes, T S Elliott.   

Abstract

The microbial colonization and the associated risk of respiratory infection during the application of a multiple-use closed-system suction catheter (CSSC) and a single-use open-system suction catheter (OSSC) on liver transplant patients was evaluated in this preliminary study. The cost differential for the two systems was also compared. Twenty post-orthotopic liver transplant (OLTx) patients who were mechanically ventilated via an endotracheal (ET) tube were studied. Ten subjects were randomly allocated ET suction by the CSSC and 10 with OSSC. Both groups were similar according to age, sex, clinical severity, presence of a naso-gastric tube, use of H2 antagonists and antibiotics used. Standard protocols were followed to intubate and suction the patients and to change ventilatory equipment. Suctioning performed with the CSSC did not significantly increase the risk of microbial colonization of the respiratory tract. Similarly there was no apparent difference in the incidence of nosocomial pneumonia between the two suction systems, based on the microbiological and clinical data. The mean daily cost of using the CSSC compared to the OSSC was 11.6 times higher. This may be balanced by a reduction in nursing time and reduced risk of spread of infection associated with the CSSC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9180492     DOI: 10.1016/s0964-3397(97)80135-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Intensive Crit Care Nurs        ISSN: 0964-3397            Impact factor:   3.072


  6 in total

1.  Impact of the suctioning system (open vs. closed) on the incidence of ventilation-associated pneumonia: Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Ralf-Peter Vonberg; Tim Eckmanns; Tobias Welte; Petra Gastmeier
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2006-06-21       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 2.  Impact of closed versus open tracheal suctioning systems for mechanically ventilated adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Akira Kuriyama; Noriyuki Umakoshi; Jun Fujinaga; Tadaaki Takada
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2014-11-26       Impact factor: 17.440

3.  Tracheal suction by closed system without daily change versus open system.

Authors:  Leonardo Lorente; María Lecuona; Alejandro Jiménez; María L Mora; Antonio Sierra
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2006-03-02       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 4.  Paradoxical ventilator associated pneumonia incidences among selective digestive decontamination studies versus other studies of mechanically ventilated patients: benchmarking the evidence base.

Authors:  James C Hurley
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2011-01-07       Impact factor: 9.097

Review 5.  Clinical review: airway hygiene in the intensive care unit.

Authors:  Sanja Jelic; Jennifer A Cunningham; Phillip Factor
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2008-03-31       Impact factor: 9.097

6.  Ventilator-associated pneumonia in patients admitted to intensive care units, using open or closed endotracheal suctioning.

Authors:  Hadi Hamishekar; Kamran Shadvar; Majid Taghizadeh; Samad Ej Golzari; Mojtaba Mojtahedzadeh; Hassan Soleimanpour; Ata Mahmoodpoor
Journal:  Anesth Pain Med       Date:  2014-09-17
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.