Literature DB >> 16510427

Solution structure of an informationally complex high-affinity RNA aptamer to GTP.

James M Carothers1, Jonathan H Davis, James J Chou, Jack W Szostak.   

Abstract

Higher-affinity RNA aptamers to GTP are more informationally complex than lower-affinity aptamers. Analog binding studies have shown that the additional information needed to improve affinity does not specify more interactions with the ligand. In light of those observations, we would like to understand the structural characteristics that enable complex aptamers to bind their ligands with higher affinity. Here we present the solution structure of the 41-nt Class I GTP aptamer (K(d) = 75 nM) as determined by NMR. The backbone of the aptamer forms a reverse-S that shapes the binding pocket. The ligand nucleobase stacks between purine platforms and makes hydrogen bonds with the edge of another base. Interestingly, the local modes of interaction for the Class I aptamer and an RNA aptamer that binds ATP with a K(d) of 6 microM are very much alike. The aptamers exhibit nearly identical levels of binding specificity and fraction of ligand sequestered from the solvent (81%-85%). However, the GTP aptamer is more informationally complex (approximately 45 vs. 35 bits) and has a larger recognition bulge (15 vs. 12 nucleotides) with many more stabilizing base-base interactions. Because the aptamers have similar modes of ligand binding, we conclude that the stabilizing structural elements in the Class I aptamer are responsible for much of the difference in K(d). These results are consistent with the hypothesis that increasing the number of intra-RNA interactions, rather than adding specific contacts to the ligand, is the simplest way to improve binding affinity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16510427      PMCID: PMC1421093          DOI: 10.1261/rna.2251306

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  RNA        ISSN: 1355-8382            Impact factor:   4.942


  44 in total

Review 1.  Adaptive recognition by nucleic acid aptamers.

Authors:  T Hermann; D J Patel
Journal:  Science       Date:  2000-02-04       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 2.  Structural motifs in RNA.

Authors:  P B Moore
Journal:  Annu Rev Biochem       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 23.643

3.  Nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy and molecular modeling reveal that different hydrogen bonding patterns are possible for G.U pairs: one hydrogen bond for each G.U pair in r(GGCGUGCC)(2) and two for each G.U pair in r(GAGUGCUC)(2).

Authors:  X Chen; J A McDowell; R Kierzek; T R Krugh; D H Turner
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2000-08-01       Impact factor: 3.162

4.  NCIR: a database of non-canonical interactions in known RNA structures.

Authors:  Uma Nagaswamy; Maia Larios-Sanz; James Hury; Shakaala Collins; Zhengdong Zhang; Qin Zhao; George E Fox
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2002-01-01       Impact factor: 16.971

5.  RNAPack: an integrated NMR approach to RNA structure determination.

Authors:  P J Lukavsky; J D Puglisi
Journal:  Methods       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 3.608

6.  A novel interactive tool for rigid-body modeling of multi-domain macromolecules using residual dipolar couplings.

Authors:  P Dosset; J C Hus; D Marion; M Blackledge
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 2.835

7.  Solution structure of an RNA fragment with the P7/P9.0 region and the 3'-terminal guanosine of the tetrahymena group I intron.

Authors:  Aya Kitamura; Yutaka Muto; Satoru Watanabe; Insil Kim; Takuhiro Ito; Yoichi Nishiya; Kensaku Sakamoto; Takashi Ohtsuki; Gota Kawai; Kimitsuna Watanabe; Kazumi Hosono; Hiroshi Takaku; Etsuko Katoh; Toshimasa Yamazaki; Tan Inoue; Shigeyuki Yokoyama
Journal:  RNA       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 4.942

8.  Parameter optimized surfaces (POPS): analysis of key interactions and conformational changes in the ribosome.

Authors:  Franca Fraternali; Luigi Cavallo
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2002-07-01       Impact factor: 16.971

9.  Compact and ordered collapse of randomly generated RNA sequences.

Authors:  Erik A Schultes; Alexander Spasic; Udayan Mohanty; David P Bartel
Journal:  Nat Struct Mol Biol       Date:  2005-11-06       Impact factor: 15.369

10.  RNA aptamers to S-adenosylhomocysteine: kinetic properties, divalent cation dependency, and comparison with anti-S-adenosylhomocysteine antibody.

Authors:  K Gebhardt; A Shokraei; E Babaie; B H Lindqvist
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2000-06-20       Impact factor: 3.162

View more
  22 in total

1.  Computational approaches toward the design of pools for the in vitro selection of complex aptamers.

Authors:  Xuemei Luo; Maureen McKeague; Sylvain Pitre; Michel Dumontier; James Green; Ashkan Golshani; Maria C Derosa; Frank Dehne
Journal:  RNA       Date:  2010-09-24       Impact factor: 4.942

2.  A computational proposal for designing structured RNA pools for in vitro selection of RNAs.

Authors:  Namhee Kim; Hin Hark Gan; Tamar Schlick
Journal:  RNA       Date:  2007-02-23       Impact factor: 4.942

Review 3.  Structural features of metabolite-sensing riboswitches.

Authors:  Catherine A Wakeman; Wade C Winkler; Charles E Dann
Journal:  Trends Biochem Sci       Date:  2007-08-30       Impact factor: 13.807

4.  Comprehensive experimental fitness landscape and evolutionary network for small RNA.

Authors:  José I Jiménez; Ramon Xulvi-Brunet; Gregory W Campbell; Rebecca Turk-MacLeod; Irene A Chen
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-08-26       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 5.  RNA-amino acid binding: a stereochemical era for the genetic code.

Authors:  Michael Yarus; Jeremy Joseph Widmann; Rob Knight
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2009-10-01       Impact factor: 2.395

6.  Amplification of RNA by an RNA polymerase ribozyme.

Authors:  David P Horning; Gerald F Joyce
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-08-15       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Selecting RNA aptamers for synthetic biology: investigating magnesium dependence and predicting binding affinity.

Authors:  James M Carothers; Jonathan A Goler; Yuvraaj Kapoor; Lesley Lara; Jay D Keasling
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2010-02-16       Impact factor: 16.971

8.  In situ simultaneous monitoring of ATP and GTP using a graphene oxide nanosheet-based sensing platform in living cells.

Authors:  Ying Wang; Longhua Tang; Zhaohui Li; Yuehe Lin; Jinghong Li
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2014-07-24       Impact factor: 13.491

9.  Convergent evolution of adenosine aptamers spanning bacterial, human, and random sequences revealed by structure-based bioinformatics and genomic SELEX.

Authors:  Michael M K Vu; Nora E Jameson; Stuart J Masuda; Dana Lin; Rosa Larralde-Ridaura; Andrej Lupták
Journal:  Chem Biol       Date:  2012-10-26

10.  Single-molecule imaging of an in vitro-evolved RNA aptamer reveals homogeneous ligand binding kinetics.

Authors:  Mark P Elenko; Jack W Szostak; Antoine M van Oijen
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2009-07-29       Impact factor: 15.419

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.