Literature DB >> 16510033

Evaluation of nonmalignant liver masses.

Wojciech Blonski1, K Rajender Reddy.   

Abstract

Nonmalignant liver masses are increasingly being recognized with the widespread use of imaging modalities such as ultrasonography, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging. The majority of these lesions are detected incidentally in asymptomatic patients. Based on the radiologic appearance, benign lesions can be categorized as solid or cystic, single or multiple, hypervascular or hypovascular. Based on histologic characteristics, they are classified as of hepatocellular, biliary, or mesenchymal origin. In the majority of patients, a proper diagnosis can be made based on these characteristics on imaging modalities alone. An invasive approach is seldom required. This review discusses the various characteristics of the most common benign liver lesions and recommends a practical approach.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16510033     DOI: 10.1007/s11894-006-0062-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep        ISSN: 1522-8037


  79 in total

1.  Characterization of focal liver lesions with contrast-specific US modes and a sulfur hexafluoride-filled microbubble contrast agent: diagnostic performance and confidence.

Authors:  Emilio Quaia; Fabrizio Calliada; Michele Bertolotto; Sandro Rossi; Lorena Garioni; Laura Rosa; Roberto Pozzi-Mucelli
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Caroli's disease: evaluation with MR cholangiopancreatography (MRCP).

Authors:  P Pavone; A Laghi; C Catalano; A Materia; N Basso; R Passariello
Journal:  Abdom Imaging       Date:  1996 Mar-Apr

Review 3.  A liver tumour as an incidental finding: differential diagnosis and treatment.

Authors:  S de Rave; S M Hussain
Journal:  Scand J Gastroenterol Suppl       Date:  2002

4.  Focal nodular hyperplasia of the liver: assessment with contrast-enhanced TurboFLASH MR imaging.

Authors:  D Mathieu; A Rahmouni; M C Anglade; B Falise; C Beges; P Gheung; J J Mollet; N Vasile
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  Nodular regenerative hyperplasia, portal vein thrombosis, and avascular hip necrosis due to hyperhomocysteinaemia.

Authors:  O Buchel; T Roskams; B Van Damme; F Nevens; J Pirenne; J Fevery
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 23.059

6.  MR imaging of hepatic focal nodular hyperplasia: characterization and distinction from primary malignant hepatic tumors.

Authors:  G R Mattison; G M Glazer; L E Quint; I R Francis; R L Bree; W D Ensminger
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1987-04       Impact factor: 3.959

7.  Cystic focal liver lesions in the adult: differential CT and MR imaging features.

Authors:  K J Mortelé; P R Ros
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2001 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 5.333

Review 8.  Ultrasound of focal liver lesions.

Authors:  C J Harvey; T Albrecht
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  Focal nodular hyperplasia of the liver in men: is presentation the same in men and women?

Authors:  A Luciani; H Kobeiter; P Maison; D Cherqui; E-S Zafrani; D Dhumeaux; D Mathieu
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 10.  Ultrasound of focal liver masses.

Authors:  Hisham Tchelepi; Philip W Ralls
Journal:  Ultrasound Q       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 1.657

View more
  4 in total

1.  Benign Lesions of the Liver.

Authors:  K Rajender Reddy
Journal:  Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y)       Date:  2006-05

Review 2.  [Diagnosis and differential diagnosis of benign liver tumors and tumor-like lesions].

Authors:  M Galanski; S Jördens; J Weidemann
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 0.955

3.  Mediastinal hemangioma mimicking an invasive tumor growth: A case report.

Authors:  Shogo Yobita; Shuhei Iizuka; Yoshiro Otsuki; Toru Nakamura
Journal:  Int J Surg Case Rep       Date:  2021-02-23

4.  Ultrasonographically detected gallbladder polyps: a reason for concern? A seven-year follow-up study.

Authors:  Wolfgang Kratzer; Mark M Haenle; Andrea Voegtle; Richard A Mason; Atilla S Akinli; Klaus Hirschbuehl; Andreas Schuler; Volker Kaechele
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2008-09-15       Impact factor: 3.067

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.