Literature DB >> 3030082

MR imaging of hepatic focal nodular hyperplasia: characterization and distinction from primary malignant hepatic tumors.

G R Mattison, G M Glazer, L E Quint, I R Francis, R L Bree, W D Ensminger.   

Abstract

Spin-echo MR imaging at 0.35 T was used to image hepatic focal nodular hyperplasia (FNH) and to attempt to distinguish it from primary malignant hepatic tumors. There were six FNH and 10 malignant tumors including seven hepatocellular carcinomas, two cholangiocarcinomas, and one hepatoblastoma. Our results show that FNH has a fairly consistent appearance, dissimilar from that of malignant primary hepatic tumors. Four of six FNH lesions were isointense (except for a central scar in three) and indistinguishable from normal hepatic parenchyma on all pulse sequences, whereas two of six were homogeneous but slightly hyperintense on T2-weighted sequences. Furthermore, a central hyperintense scar was seen in three of six lesions on T2-weighted sequences. In contrast, each of the malignant primary hepatic tumors was hyperintense on T2-weighted sequences and seven of 10 were hypointense on T1-weighted sequences; in nine of 10, heterogeneous areas of intensity were noted. In two fibrolamellar hepatocellular carcinomas a central scar was seen that was hypointense on all pulse sequences. By using quantitative data, the best characterization was obtained by using lesion/normal-liver intensity ratios from a T2-weighted sequence; all FNH had a ratio less than 1.33, while in nine of 10 primary malignant tumors it was greater than 1.41. We conclude that focal nodular hyperplasia may have a consistent appearance on spin-echo MR imaging and probably can be distinguished from primary malignant lesions in most instances.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3030082     DOI: 10.2214/ajr.148.4.711

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol        ISSN: 0361-803X            Impact factor:   3.959


  11 in total

Review 1.  Evaluation of nonmalignant liver masses.

Authors:  Wojciech Blonski; K Rajender Reddy
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2006-02

2.  Differentiation of benign and malignant focal liver lesions: value of virtual touch tissue quantification of acoustic radiation force impulse elastography.

Authors:  Le-Hang Guo; Shu-Jun Wang; Hui-Xiong Xu; Li-Ping Sun; Yi-Feng Zhang; Jun-Mei Xu; Jian Wu; Hui-Jun Fu; Xiao-Hong Xu
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2015-02-19       Impact factor: 3.064

3.  Focal nodular hyperplasia of the liver in men: is presentation the same in men and women?

Authors:  A Luciani; H Kobeiter; P Maison; D Cherqui; E-S Zafrani; D Dhumeaux; D Mathieu
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 23.059

4.  MRI of hepatic focal nodular hyperplasia: a report of two new cases in the pediatric age group.

Authors:  P Tomá; A Taccone; C Martinoli
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  1990

5.  Focal nodular hyperplasia of the liver: radiologic findings.

Authors:  K Shamsi; A De Schepper; H Degryse; F Deckers
Journal:  Abdom Imaging       Date:  1993

6.  MR findings in liver adenomatosis.

Authors:  B I Choi; J K Han; S H Kim; M C Han
Journal:  Gastrointest Radiol       Date:  1991

7.  Focal nodular hyperplasia of the liver without central scar.

Authors:  M Matsushita; K Hajiro; T Suzaki; H Takakuwa; H Sawami; F Kusumi; Y Konishi; M Maruo; M Ohana; A Okano
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 3.199

8.  T2-weighted four dimensional magnetic resonance imaging with result-driven phase sorting.

Authors:  Yilin Liu; Fang-Fang Yin; Brian G Czito; Mustafa R Bashir; Jing Cai
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 4.071

9.  Dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging of fibrolamellar hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  K Corrigan; R C Semelka
Journal:  Abdom Imaging       Date:  1995 Mar-Apr

Review 10.  Distinguishing benign from malignant liver tumours.

Authors:  Jay P Heiken
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2007-10-01       Impact factor: 3.909

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.