Literature DB >> 16505428

Advanced breast cancer patients' perceptions of decision making for palliative chemotherapy.

Elizabeth A Grunfeld1, E Jane Maher, Susannah Browne, Pippa Ward, Teresa Young, Bella Vivat, Gay Walker, Cathy Wilson, Henry W Potts, Alex M Westcombe, Michael A Richards, Amanda J Ramirez.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To examine advanced breast cancer patients' perceptions of the key decision-making consultation for palliative chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred two women with advanced breast cancer, who were offered palliative chemotherapy, participated in a study-specific semistructured interview examining perceptions of the information they had received and their involvement in the decision-making process. One hundred seventeen interviews included 70 in relation to first-line chemotherapy and 47 in relation to second-line chemotherapy (15 patients were interviewed in relation to both first- and second-line chemotherapy).
RESULTS: Eighty-six percent of patient interviews (n = 101) reported patient satisfaction with the information they received, and 91% (n = 106) reported satisfaction with the decision-making process. Factors most influential in decisions to accept chemotherapy were the possibility of controlling the tumor (45%, n = 53 of patient interviews) and providing hope (33%, n = 28 of patient interviews; 19%, n = 13 being offered first-line chemotherapy v 43%, n = 20 being offered second-line chemotherapy; P = .006). Thirty-eight percent of patient interviews (n = 44) reported the patient as taking an active role in the decision-making process (33%, n = 23 at first-line chemotherapy v 43%, n = 20 at second-line chemotherapy; P = .06).
CONCLUSION: Women offered second-line chemotherapy were more likely to undergo chemotherapy because of the hope it offers and were more likely to take an active role in that decision compared with women who were offered first-line chemotherapy. Compassionate and honest communication about prognosis and likelihood of benefit from treatment may help to close the gap between hope and expectation and enable patients to make fully informed decisions about palliative chemotherapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16505428     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2005.01.9208

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  22 in total

1.  Involvement in decision-making about treatment and ovarian cancer survivor quality of life.

Authors:  M Robyn Andersen; Erin Sweet; Kimberly A Lowe; Leanna J Standish; Charles W Drescher; Barbara A Goff
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2011-10-29       Impact factor: 5.482

2.  Palliative medicine and decision science: the critical need for a shared agenda to foster informed patient choice in serious illness.

Authors:  Marie Bakitas; Jennifer Kryworuchko; Dan D Matlock; Angelo E Volandes
Journal:  J Palliat Med       Date:  2011-09-06       Impact factor: 2.947

3.  Targeted agent use in cancer patients at the end of life.

Authors:  David Hui; Meghan Sri Karuturi; Kimberson Cochien Tanco; Jung Hye Kwon; Sun-Hyun Kim; Tao Zhang; Jung Hun Kang; Gary Chisholm; Eduardo Bruera
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2012-12-01       Impact factor: 3.612

4.  Understanding the complexities of shared decision-making in cancer: a qualitative study of the perspectives of patients undergoing colorectal surgery.

Authors:  Dhruvin H Hirpara; Michelle C Cleghorn; Sanjeev Sockalingam; Fayez A Quereshy
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 2.089

5.  The role of chemotherapy at the end of life: "when is enough, enough?".

Authors:  Sarah Elizabeth Harrington; Thomas J Smith
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2008-06-11       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Who gets genomic testing for breast cancer recurrence risk?

Authors:  J T DeFrank; T Salz; K Reeder-Hayes; N T Brewer
Journal:  Public Health Genomics       Date:  2013-07-30       Impact factor: 2.000

7.  Palliative care needs of cancer outpatients receiving chemotherapy: an audit of a clinical screening project.

Authors:  Tatsuya Morita; Koji Fujimoto; Miki Namba; Naoko Sasaki; Tomoko Ito; Chika Yamada; Arisa Ohba; Motoki Hiroyoshi; Hiroshi Niwa; Takeshi Yamada; Tsuneo Noda
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2007-07-05       Impact factor: 3.603

8.  Palliative Chemotherapy or Radiation and Prognostic Understanding among Advanced Cancer Patients: The Role of Perceived Treatment Intent.

Authors:  Login S George; Holly G Prigerson; Andrew S Epstein; Kristy L Richards; Megan J Shen; Heather M Derry; Valerie F Reyna; Manish A Shah; Paul K Maciejewski
Journal:  J Palliat Med       Date:  2019-10-08       Impact factor: 2.947

Review 9.  Integration of palliative care practices into the ongoing care of children with cancer: individualized care planning and coordination.

Authors:  Justin N Baker; Pamela S Hinds; Sheri L Spunt; Raymond C Barfield; Caitlin Allen; Brent C Powell; Lisa H Anderson; Javier R Kane
Journal:  Pediatr Clin North Am       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 3.278

10.  Decision-making in patients with advanced cancer compared with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.

Authors:  A B Astrow; J R Sood; M T Nolan; P B Terry; L Clawson; J Kub; M Hughes; D P Sulmasy
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 2.903

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.