Literature DB >> 18757636

Decision-making in patients with advanced cancer compared with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.

A B Astrow1, J R Sood, M T Nolan, P B Terry, L Clawson, J Kub, M Hughes, D P Sulmasy.   

Abstract

AIM: Patients with advanced cancer need information about end-of-life treatment options in order to make informed decisions. Clinicians vary in the frequency with which they initiate these discussions. PATIENTS AND METHODS: As part of a long-term longitudinal study, patients with an expected 2-year survival of less than 50% who had advanced gastrointestinal or lung cancer or amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) were interviewed. Each patient's medical record was reviewed at enrollment and at 3 months for evidence of the discussion of patient wishes concerning ventilator support, artificial nutrition and hydration (ANH), resuscitation (DNR) and hospice care. A Kaplan-Meier analysis was also performed and 2-year survival calculated.
RESULTS: 60 cancer and 32 ALS patients were enrolled. ALS patients were more likely than cancer patients to have evidence of discussion about their wishes for ventilator support (31% vs 0%, p<0.001), ANH (38% vs 0%, p<0.001), DNR (25% vs 0%, p<0.001) and hospice care (22% vs 5%, p = 0.03). At 6 months, 91% of ALS patients were alive compared with 62% of cancer patients; at 2 years, 63% of ALS patients were alive compared with 23% of cancer patients (p<0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Cancer patients were less likely than ALS patients to have had documented advanced care planning discussions despite worse survival. This may reflect perceptions that ALS has a more predictable course, that advanced cancer has a greater number of treatment options, or differing views about hope. Nevertheless, cancer patients may be less adequately prepared for end-of-life decision-making.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18757636      PMCID: PMC2572766          DOI: 10.1136/jme.2007.022731

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Ethics        ISSN: 0306-6800            Impact factor:   2.903


  37 in total

1.  Practice parameter: the care of the patient with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (an evidence-based review): report of the Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology: ALS Practice Parameters Task Force.

Authors:  R G Miller; J A Rosenberg; D F Gelinas; H Mitsumoto; D Newman; R Sufit; G D Borasio; W G Bradley; M B Bromberg; B R Brooks; E J Kasarskis; T L Munsat; E A Oppenheimer
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  1999-04-22       Impact factor: 9.910

2.  Communicating with realism and hope: incurable cancer patients' views on the disclosure of prognosis.

Authors:  Rebecca G Hagerty; Phyllis N Butow; Peter M Ellis; Elizabeth A Lobb; Susan C Pendlebury; Natasha Leighl; Craig MacLeod; Craig Mac Leod; Martin H N Tattersall
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2005-02-20       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  Improving physician-patient communication in cancer care: outcome of a workshop for oncologists.

Authors:  W F Baile; R Lenzi; A P Kudelka; P Maguire; D Novack; M Goldstein; E G Myers; R C Bast
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 2.037

4.  Do the ward notes reflect the quality of end-of-life care?

Authors:  D P Sulmasy; M Dwyer; E Marx
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 2.903

5.  The McGill Quality of Life Questionnaire: a measure of quality of life appropriate for people with advanced disease. A preliminary study of validity and acceptability.

Authors:  S R Cohen; B M Mount; M G Strobel; F Bui
Journal:  Palliat Med       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 4.762

6.  Oncology and hope.

Authors:  E Kodish; S G Post
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Advance care planning. Priorities for ethical and empirical research.

Authors:  J M Teno; H L Nelson; J Lynn
Journal:  Hastings Cent Rep       Date:  1994 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.683

8.  A controlled trial to improve care for seriously ill hospitalized patients. The study to understand prognoses and preferences for outcomes and risks of treatments (SUPPORT). The SUPPORT Principal Investigators.

Authors: 
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1995 Nov 22-29       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  The power of compassion: truth-telling among American doctors in the care of dying patients.

Authors:  N T Miyaji
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 4.634

10.  Disclosing the cancer diagnosis. Procedures that influence patient hopefulness.

Authors:  A N Sardell; S J Trierweiler
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1993-12-01       Impact factor: 6.860

View more
  12 in total

1.  Advance care planning for patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.

Authors:  Benjamin H Levi; Zachary Simmons; Courtney Hanna; Allyson Brothers; Erik Lehman; Elana Farace; Megan Bain; Renee Stewart; Michael J Green
Journal:  Amyotroph Lateral Scler Frontotemporal Degener       Date:  2017-03-05       Impact factor: 4.092

2.  The Trial of Ascertaining Individual Preferences for Loved Ones' Role in End-of-Life Decisions (TAILORED) Study: A Randomized Controlled Trial to Improve Surrogate Decision Making.

Authors:  Daniel P Sulmasy; Mark T Hughes; Gayane Yenokyan; Joan Kub; Peter B Terry; Alan B Astrow; Julie A Johnson; Grace Ho; Marie T Nolan
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2017-07-14       Impact factor: 3.612

3.  The Developmental Transition From Living With to Dying From Cancer: Hospice Decision Making.

Authors:  Deborah Waldrop; Mary Ann Meeker; Jean S Kutner
Journal:  J Psychosoc Oncol       Date:  2015

Review 4.  The end-of-life phase of high-grade glioma patients: a systematic review.

Authors:  Eefje M Sizoo; H Roeline W Pasman; Linda Dirven; Christine Marosi; Wolfgang Grisold; Günther Stockhammer; Jonas Egeter; Robin Grant; Susan Chang; Jan J Heimans; Luc Deliens; Jaap C Reijneveld; Martin J B Taphoorn
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2013-12-14       Impact factor: 3.603

5.  End-of-life care for Medicare beneficiaries with cancer is highly intensive overall and varies widely.

Authors:  Nancy E Morden; Chiang-Hua Chang; Joseph O Jacobson; Ethan M Berke; Julie P W Bynum; Kimberly M Murray; David C Goodman
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 6.301

6.  Old age and poor prognosis increase the likelihood of disagreement between cancer patients and their oncologists on the indication for resuscitation attempt.

Authors:  Lena Saltbaek; Hanne M Michelsen; Knud M Nelausen; Rikke Gut; Dorte L Nielsen
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2013-08-08       Impact factor: 3.603

7.  Engaging in patient decision-making in multidisciplinary care for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: the views of health professionals.

Authors:  Anne Hogden; David Greenfield; Peter Nugus; Matthew C Kiernan
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2012-09-27       Impact factor: 2.711

8.  Patient and caregiver characteristics related to completion of advance directives in terminally ill patients.

Authors:  Grace W K Ho; Lauren Skaggs; Gayane Yenokyan; Anela Kellogg; Julie A Johnson; Mei Ching Lee; Katherine Heinze; Mark T Hughes; Daniel P Sulmasy; Joan Kub; Peter B Terry; Alan B Astrow; Jing Zheng; Lisa Soleymani Lehmann; Marie T Nolan
Journal:  Palliat Support Care       Date:  2016-05-30

9.  High-Intensity End-of-Life Care Among Patients With GI Cancer in Puerto Rico: A Population-Based Study.

Authors:  Karen J Ortiz-Ortiz; Guillermo Tortolero-Luna; Carlos R Torres-Cintrón; Diego E Zavala-Zegarra; Axel Gierbolini-Bermúdez; María R Ramos-Fernández
Journal:  JCO Oncol Pract       Date:  2021-02

10.  What influences patient decision-making in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis multidisciplinary care? A study of patient perspectives.

Authors:  Anne Hogden; David Greenfield; Peter Nugus; Matthew C Kiernan
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2012-11-27       Impact factor: 2.711

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.