PURPOSE: The dose-response relationship for a relatively short length (4 mm) of rat spinal cord has been shown to be significantly modified by adjacent low-dose fields. In an additional series of experiments, we have now established the dose-volume dependence of this effect. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Wistar rats were irradiated on the cervical spinal cord with single doses of unmodulated protons (150 MeV) to obtain sharp lateral penumbras, by use of the shoot-through technique, which employs the plateau of the depth-dose profile rather than the Bragg peak. Three types of inhomogeneous dose distributions were administered: Twenty millimeters of cervical spinal cord were irradiated with variable subthreshold (= bath) doses (4 and 18 Gy). At the center of the 20-mm segment, a short segment of 2 mm or 8 mm (= shower) was irradiated with variable single doses. These inhomogeneous dose distributions are referred to as symmetrical bath-and-shower experiments. An asymmetrical dose distribution was arranged by irradiation of 12 mm (= bath) of spinal cord with a dose of 4 Gy. The caudal 2 mm (= shower) of the 12-mm bath was additionally irradiated with variable single doses. This arrangement of inhomogeneous dose distribution is referred to as asymmetrical bath-and-shower experiment. The endpoint for estimation of the dose-response relationships was paralysis of the fore limbs or hind limbs and confirmation by histology. RESULTS: The 2-mm bath-and-shower experiments with a 4-Gy bath dose showed a large shift of the dose-response curves compared with the 2-mm single field, which give lower ED50 values of 61.2 Gy and 68.6 Gy for the symmetrical and asymmetrical arrangement, respectively, compared with an ED50 of 87.8 Gy after irradiation of a 2-mm field only. If the bath dose is increased to 18 Gy, the ED50 value is decreased further to 30.9 Gy. For an 8-mm field, addition of a 4-Gy bath dose did not modify the ED50 obtained for an 8-mm field only (23.2 and 23.1 Gy). CONCLUSIONS: The spinal cord tolerance of relatively small volumes (shower) is strongly affected by low-dose irradiation (= bath) of adjacent tissue. The results of all bath-and-shower experiments show the effect of a low bath dose to be highest for a field of 2 mm, less for 4 mm, and absent for 8 mm. Adding a 4-Gy bath to only 1 side of a 2-mm field still showed a large effect. Because glial progenitor cells are known to migrate over at least 2 to 3 mm, this observation indicates that interference with stem cell migration is not the most likely mechanism of a bath effect.
PURPOSE: The dose-response relationship for a relatively short length (4 mm) of rat spinal cord has been shown to be significantly modified by adjacent low-dose fields. In an additional series of experiments, we have now established the dose-volume dependence of this effect. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Wistar rats were irradiated on the cervical spinal cord with single doses of unmodulated protons (150 MeV) to obtain sharp lateral penumbras, by use of the shoot-through technique, which employs the plateau of the depth-dose profile rather than the Bragg peak. Three types of inhomogeneous dose distributions were administered: Twenty millimeters of cervical spinal cord were irradiated with variable subthreshold (= bath) doses (4 and 18 Gy). At the center of the 20-mm segment, a short segment of 2 mm or 8 mm (= shower) was irradiated with variable single doses. These inhomogeneous dose distributions are referred to as symmetrical bath-and-shower experiments. An asymmetrical dose distribution was arranged by irradiation of 12 mm (= bath) of spinal cord with a dose of 4 Gy. The caudal 2 mm (= shower) of the 12-mm bath was additionally irradiated with variable single doses. This arrangement of inhomogeneous dose distribution is referred to as asymmetrical bath-and-shower experiment. The endpoint for estimation of the dose-response relationships was paralysis of the fore limbs or hind limbs and confirmation by histology. RESULTS: The 2-mm bath-and-shower experiments with a 4-Gy bath dose showed a large shift of the dose-response curves compared with the 2-mm single field, which give lower ED50 values of 61.2 Gy and 68.6 Gy for the symmetrical and asymmetrical arrangement, respectively, compared with an ED50 of 87.8 Gy after irradiation of a 2-mm field only. If the bath dose is increased to 18 Gy, the ED50 value is decreased further to 30.9 Gy. For an 8-mm field, addition of a 4-Gy bath dose did not modify the ED50 obtained for an 8-mm field only (23.2 and 23.1 Gy). CONCLUSIONS: The spinal cord tolerance of relatively small volumes (shower) is strongly affected by low-dose irradiation (= bath) of adjacent tissue. The results of all bath-and-shower experiments show the effect of a low bath dose to be highest for a field of 2 mm, less for 4 mm, and absent for 8 mm. Adding a 4-Gy bath to only 1 side of a 2-mm field still showed a large effect. Because glial progenitor cells are known to migrate over at least 2 to 3 mm, this observation indicates that interference with stem cell migration is not the most likely mechanism of a bath effect.
Authors: Daniel Pak; Karen Vineberg; Felix Feng; Randall K Ten Haken; Avraham Eisbruch Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2012-01-26 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: V E M Mul; J M A de Jong; L H P Murrer; P L A van den Ende; R M A Houben; M Lacko; P Lambin; B G Baumert Journal: Strahlenther Onkol Date: 2011-12-23 Impact factor: 3.621
Authors: Daniel R Gomez; Susan L Tucker; Mary K Martel; Radhe Mohan; Peter A Balter; Jose Luis Lopez Guerra; Hongmei Liu; Ritsuko Komaki; James D Cox; Zhongxing Liao Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2012-08-21 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: M N Duma; T Schuster; N Aswathanarayana; L-S Fromm; M Molls; H Geinitz; S Kampfer Journal: Strahlenther Onkol Date: 2013-10-10 Impact factor: 3.621
Authors: Maria Saager; Peter Peschke; Thomas Welzel; Lifi Huang; Stephan Brons; Rebecca Grün; Michael Scholz; Jürgen Debus; Christian P Karger Journal: Radiat Oncol Date: 2018-01-11 Impact factor: 3.481
Authors: Huaising C Ko; Allison R Powers; Ren-dih Sheu; Sarah L Kerns; Barry S Rosenstein; Stephen C Krieger; Waleed F Mourad; Kenneth S Hu; Vishal Gupta; Richard L Bakst Journal: PLoS One Date: 2015-10-08 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Hannah M Laidley; David J Noble; Gill C Barnett; Julia R Forman; Amy M Bates; Richard J Benson; Sarah J Jefferies; Rajesh Jena; Neil G Burnet Journal: Radiat Oncol Date: 2018-05-04 Impact factor: 3.481