Literature DB >> 16504760

Influence of adjacent low-dose fields on tolerance to high doses of protons in rat cervical spinal cord.

Hendrik P Bijl1, Peter van Luijk, Rob P Coppes, Jacobus M Schippers, Antonius W T Konings, Albert J van der Kogel.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The dose-response relationship for a relatively short length (4 mm) of rat spinal cord has been shown to be significantly modified by adjacent low-dose fields. In an additional series of experiments, we have now established the dose-volume dependence of this effect. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Wistar rats were irradiated on the cervical spinal cord with single doses of unmodulated protons (150 MeV) to obtain sharp lateral penumbras, by use of the shoot-through technique, which employs the plateau of the depth-dose profile rather than the Bragg peak. Three types of inhomogeneous dose distributions were administered: Twenty millimeters of cervical spinal cord were irradiated with variable subthreshold (= bath) doses (4 and 18 Gy). At the center of the 20-mm segment, a short segment of 2 mm or 8 mm (= shower) was irradiated with variable single doses. These inhomogeneous dose distributions are referred to as symmetrical bath-and-shower experiments. An asymmetrical dose distribution was arranged by irradiation of 12 mm (= bath) of spinal cord with a dose of 4 Gy. The caudal 2 mm (= shower) of the 12-mm bath was additionally irradiated with variable single doses. This arrangement of inhomogeneous dose distribution is referred to as asymmetrical bath-and-shower experiment. The endpoint for estimation of the dose-response relationships was paralysis of the fore limbs or hind limbs and confirmation by histology.
RESULTS: The 2-mm bath-and-shower experiments with a 4-Gy bath dose showed a large shift of the dose-response curves compared with the 2-mm single field, which give lower ED50 values of 61.2 Gy and 68.6 Gy for the symmetrical and asymmetrical arrangement, respectively, compared with an ED50 of 87.8 Gy after irradiation of a 2-mm field only. If the bath dose is increased to 18 Gy, the ED50 value is decreased further to 30.9 Gy. For an 8-mm field, addition of a 4-Gy bath dose did not modify the ED50 obtained for an 8-mm field only (23.2 and 23.1 Gy).
CONCLUSIONS: The spinal cord tolerance of relatively small volumes (shower) is strongly affected by low-dose irradiation (= bath) of adjacent tissue. The results of all bath-and-shower experiments show the effect of a low bath dose to be highest for a field of 2 mm, less for 4 mm, and absent for 8 mm. Adding a 4-Gy bath to only 1 side of a 2-mm field still showed a large effect. Because glial progenitor cells are known to migrate over at least 2 to 3 mm, this observation indicates that interference with stem cell migration is not the most likely mechanism of a bath effect.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16504760     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2005.06.046

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  11 in total

1.  Lhermitte sign after chemo-IMRT of head-and-neck cancer: incidence, doses, and potential mechanisms.

Authors:  Daniel Pak; Karen Vineberg; Felix Feng; Randall K Ten Haken; Avraham Eisbruch
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2012-01-26       Impact factor: 7.038

Review 2.  Spinal cord tolerance in the age of spinal radiosurgery: lessons from preclinical studies.

Authors:  Paul M Medin; Thomas P Boike
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2010-12-22       Impact factor: 7.038

3.  Application of organ tolerance dose-constraints in clinical studies in radiation oncology.

Authors:  Wolfgang Dörr; Thomas Herrmann; Michael Baumann
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2014-03-07       Impact factor: 3.621

4.  Lhermitte sign and myelopathy after irradiation of the cervical spinal cord in radiotherapy treatment of head and neck cancer.

Authors:  V E M Mul; J M A de Jong; L H P Murrer; P L A van den Ende; R M A Houben; M Lacko; P Lambin; B G Baumert
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2011-12-23       Impact factor: 3.621

5.  Spinal cord constraints in the era of high-precision radiotherapy : Retrospective analysis of 62 spinal/paraspinal lesions with possible infringements of spinal cord constraints within a minimal volume.

Authors:  Sebastian Zschaeck; Peter Wust; Reinhold Graf; Waldemar Wlodarczyk; Reinhard Schild; Alexander Henry Thieme; Mirko Weihrauch; Volker Budach; Pirus Ghadjar
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2017-05-02       Impact factor: 3.621

6.  Predictors of high-grade esophagitis after definitive three-dimensional conformal therapy, intensity-modulated radiation therapy, or proton beam therapy for non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Daniel R Gomez; Susan L Tucker; Mary K Martel; Radhe Mohan; Peter A Balter; Jose Luis Lopez Guerra; Hongmei Liu; Ritsuko Komaki; James D Cox; Zhongxing Liao
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2012-08-21       Impact factor: 7.038

7.  Localization and quantification of the delivered dose to the spinal cord. Predicting actual delivered dose during daily MVCT image-guided tomotherapy.

Authors:  M N Duma; T Schuster; N Aswathanarayana; L-S Fromm; M Molls; H Geinitz; S Kampfer
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2013-10-10       Impact factor: 3.621

8.  Late normal tissue response in the rat spinal cord after carbon ion irradiation.

Authors:  Maria Saager; Peter Peschke; Thomas Welzel; Lifi Huang; Stephan Brons; Rebecca Grün; Michael Scholz; Jürgen Debus; Christian P Karger
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2018-01-11       Impact factor: 3.481

9.  Lhermitte's Sign following VMAT-Based Head and Neck Radiation-Insights into Mechanism.

Authors:  Huaising C Ko; Allison R Powers; Ren-dih Sheu; Sarah L Kerns; Barry S Rosenstein; Stephen C Krieger; Waleed F Mourad; Kenneth S Hu; Vishal Gupta; Richard L Bakst
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-10-08       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Identifying risk factors for L'Hermitte's sign after IMRT for head and neck cancer.

Authors:  Hannah M Laidley; David J Noble; Gill C Barnett; Julia R Forman; Amy M Bates; Richard J Benson; Sarah J Jefferies; Rajesh Jena; Neil G Burnet
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2018-05-04       Impact factor: 3.481

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.