Literature DB >> 24604558

Application of organ tolerance dose-constraints in clinical studies in radiation oncology.

Wolfgang Dörr1, Thomas Herrmann, Michael Baumann.   

Abstract

In modern radiation oncology, tolerance dose-constraints for organs at risk (OAR) must be considered for treatment planning, but particularly in order to design clinical studies. Tolerance dose tables, however, only address one aspect of the therapeutic ratio of any clinical study, i.e., the limitation of adverse events, but not the desired potential improvement in the tumor effect of a novel treatment strategy. A sensible application of "tolerance doses" in a clinical situation requires consideration of various critical aspects addressed here: definition of tolerance dose, specification of an endpoint/symptom, consideration of radiation quality and irradiation protocol, exposed volume and dose distribution, and patient-related factors of radiosensitivity. The currently most comprehensive estimates of OAR radiation tolerance are in the QUANTEC compilations (2010). However, these tolerance dose values must only be regarded as a rough orientation and cannot answer the relevant question for the patients, i.e., if the study can achieve a therapeutic advantage; this can obviously be answered only by the final scientific analysis of the study results. Despite all limitations, the design of clinical studies should currently refer to the QUANTEC values for appreciation of the risk of complications, if needed supplemented by one's own data or further information from the literature. The implementation of a consensus on the safety interests of the patients and on an application and approval process committed to progress in medicine, with transparent quality-assuring requirements with regard to the structural safeguarding of the study activities, plays a central role in clinical research in radiation oncology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24604558     DOI: 10.1007/s00066-014-0613-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol        ISSN: 0179-7158            Impact factor:   3.621


  20 in total

1.  Regional differences in radiosensitivity across the rat cervical spinal cord.

Authors:  Hendrik P Bijl; Peter van Luijk; Rob P Coppes; Jacobus M Schippers; Antonius W T Konings; Albert J van Der Kogel
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2005-02-01       Impact factor: 7.038

2.  Guest editor's introduction to QUANTEC: a users guide.

Authors:  Lawrence B Marks; Randall K Ten Haken; Mary K Martel
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2010-03-01       Impact factor: 7.038

3.  Physiological interaction of heart and lung in thoracic irradiation.

Authors:  Ghazaleh Ghobadi; Sonja van der Veen; Beatrijs Bartelds; Rudolf A de Boer; Michael G Dickinson; Johan R de Jong; Hette Faber; Maarten Niemantsverdriet; Sytze Brandenburg; Rolf M F Berger; Johannes A Langendijk; Robert P Coppes; Peter van Luijk
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2012-09-11       Impact factor: 7.038

4.  Effect of changing weekly dose on accelerated repopulation during fractionated irradiation of mouse tongue mucosa.

Authors:  W Dörr; M Weber-Frisch
Journal:  Int J Radiat Biol       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 2.694

5.  Target volume coverage and dose to organs at risk in prostate cancer patients. Dose calculation on daily cone-beam CT data sets.

Authors:  P Hüttenrauch; M Witt; D Wolff; S Bosold; R Engenhart-Cabillic; J Sparenberg; H Vorwerk; K Zink
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2014-01-16       Impact factor: 3.621

6.  Association of genetic variants in apoptosis genes FAS and FASL with radiation-induced late toxicity after prostate cancer radiotherapy.

Authors:  E-M Thurner; S Krenn-Pilko; U Langsenlehner; W Renner; A Gerger; K S Kapp; T Langsenlehner
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2014-01-16       Impact factor: 3.621

7.  Regional differences in lung radiosensitivity after radiotherapy for non-small-cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Yvette Seppenwoolde; Katrien De Jaeger; Liesbeth J Boersma; José S A Belderbos; Joos V Lebesque
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2004-11-01       Impact factor: 7.038

8.  Localization and quantification of the delivered dose to the spinal cord. Predicting actual delivered dose during daily MVCT image-guided tomotherapy.

Authors:  M N Duma; T Schuster; N Aswathanarayana; L-S Fromm; M Molls; H Geinitz; S Kampfer
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2013-10-10       Impact factor: 3.621

9.  Volumetric evaluation of an alternative bladder point in brachytherapy for locally advanced cervical cancer.

Authors:  R Mazeron; J Gilmore; J Champoudry; I Dumas; J Helou; P Maroun; F Martinetti; A Gerbaulet; C Haie-Meder
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2013-11-17       Impact factor: 3.621

Review 10.  Radiotherapy and "new" drugs-new side effects?

Authors:  Maximilian Niyazi; Cornelius Maihoefer; Mechthild Krause; Claus Rödel; Wilfried Budach; Claus Belka
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2011-12-21       Impact factor: 3.481

View more
  7 in total

1.  Clinical radiation oncology trials in Germany: Time for clarification and professionalization.

Authors:  Rainer Fietkau; Frederik Wenz
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 3.621

Review 2.  Inclusion of dosimetric data as covariates in toxicity-related radiogenomic studies : A systematic review.

Authors:  Noorazrul Yahya; Xin-Jane Chua; Hanani A Manan; Fuad Ismail
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2018-05-17       Impact factor: 3.621

3.  Stereotactic radiotherapy of vestibular schwannoma : Hearing preservation, vestibular function, and local control following primary and salvage radiotherapy.

Authors:  Florian Putz; Jan Müller; Caterina Wimmer; Nicole Goerig; Stefan Knippen; Heinrich Iro; Philipp Grundtner; Ilker Eyüpoglu; Karl Rössler; Sabine Semrau; Rainer Fietkau; Sebastian Lettmaier
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2016-12-07       Impact factor: 3.621

4.  A feasibility dosimetric study on prostate cancer : are we ready for a multicenter clinical trial on SBRT?

Authors:  Carmelo Marino; Elena Villaggi; Giulia Maggi; Marco Esposito; Lidia Strigari; Elisa Bonanno; Giusi R Borzì; Claudia Carbonini; Rita Consorti; David Fedele; Christian Fiandra; Isidora Ielo; Tiziana Malatesta; Maria Rosa Malisan; Anna Martinotti; Renzo Moretti; Barbara Nardiello; Caterina Oliviero; Stefania Clemente; Pietro Mancosu
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2015-03-08       Impact factor: 3.621

5.  Mesenchymal stem cells are sensitive to treatment with kinase inhibitors and ionizing radiation.

Authors:  Nils H Nicolay; Eva Sommer; Ramon Lopez Perez; Ute Wirkner; Tilman Bostel; Anthony D Ho; Michael Lahn; Jürgen Debus; Rainer Saffrich; Peter E Huber
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2014-05-27       Impact factor: 3.621

6.  Regional nodal relapse in surgically staged Merkel cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Ulrike Hoeller; Thomas Mueller; Tina Schubert; Volker Budach; Pirus Ghadjar; Winfried Brenner; Felix Kiecker; Bernd Schicke; Oliver Haase
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2014-10-08       Impact factor: 3.621

7.  Improved survival for elderly married glioblastoma patients : Better treatment delivery, less toxicity, and fewer disease complications.

Authors:  Florian Putz; Tobias Putz; Nicole Goerig; Stefan Knippen; Thomas Gryc; Ilker Eyüpoglu; Karl Rössler; Sabine Semrau; Sebastian Lettmaier; Rainer Fietkau
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2016-09-14       Impact factor: 3.621

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.