Literature DB >> 16504542

Direct MRI detection of neuronal magnetic fields in the brain: theoretical modeling.

Yiqun Xue1, Jia-Hong Gao, Jinhu Xiong.   

Abstract

Whether MRI can be used for direct detection of neuronal activity is a matter of debate. Controversial theoretical and experimental results have been reported. Here, we present an improved current-dipole model to compute magnetic field generated by neural firing and to calculate MRI signal changes resulting from the neuronal magnetic field (NMF). Each dendrite or each unmyelinated axon was modeled as a modified current-dipole. NMF were estimated based on a synchronized activity of multiple neurons. Sensitivity of using phase and magnitude MRI to measure effects of NMF was evaluated. Our results show that NMF can potentially generate up to a few percent changes in MRI magnitude signals. Phases of MRI signal tend to be destructively added and are insensitive to NMF in the activated region when the distribution of the activated dendrites is symmetrical. Phases could be detected when the distribution of the activated dendrites is asymmetrical and on some neighboring voxels. Our modeling implies that direct MRI detection of neuronal activity is possible.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16504542     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.12.041

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  13 in total

1.  Magnetic resonance imaging of oscillating electrical currents.

Authors:  Nicholas W Halpern-Manners; Vikram S Bajaj; Thomas Z Teisseyre; Alexander Pines
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-04-26       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Finding neuroelectric activity under magnetic-field oscillations (NAMO) with magnetic resonance imaging in vivo.

Authors:  Trong-Kha Truong; Allen W Song
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-08-07       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Direct magnetic resonance detection of neuronal electrical activity.

Authors:  Natalia Petridou; Dietmar Plenz; Afonso C Silva; Murray Loew; Jerzy Bodurka; Peter A Bandettini
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-10-12       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Modeling direct effects of neural current on MRI.

Authors:  Leon Heller; Benjamin E Barrowes; John S George
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 5.038

5.  Direct detection of a single evoked action potential with MRS in Lumbricus terrestris.

Authors:  Alexander J Poplawsky; Raymond Dingledine; Xiaoping P Hu
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2011-07-05       Impact factor: 4.044

6.  Can high-field MREIT be used to directly detect neural activity? Theoretical considerations.

Authors:  R J Sadleir; S C Grant; E J Woo
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2010-04-09       Impact factor: 6.556

7.  Magnetic resonance imaging of ionic currents in solution: the effect of magnetohydrodynamic flow.

Authors:  Mukund Balasubramanian; Robert V Mulkern; William M Wells; Padmavathi Sundaram; Darren B Orbach
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2014-10-01       Impact factor: 4.668

8.  Modeling neuronal current MRI signal with human neuron.

Authors:  Qingfei Luo; Xia Jiang; Bin Chen; Yi Zhu; Jia-Hong Gao
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2011-01-19       Impact factor: 4.668

9.  Physiologically evoked neuronal current MRI in a bloodless turtle brain: detectable or not?

Authors:  Qingfei Luo; Huo Lu; Hanbing Lu; David Senseman; Keith Worsley; Yihong Yang; Jia-Hong Gao
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2009-06-16       Impact factor: 6.556

10.  Octopus visual system: a functional MRI model for detecting neuronal electric currents without a blood-oxygen-level-dependent confound.

Authors:  Xia Jiang; Hanbing Lu; Shuichi Shigeno; Li-Hai Tan; Yihong Yang; Clifton W Ragsdale; Jia-Hong Gao
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2013-12-02       Impact factor: 4.668

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.