Literature DB >> 16504272

Initial comparison of robotic-assisted laparoscopic versus open pyeloplasty in children.

David S Yee1, Allan M Shanberg, Barry P Duel, Esequiel Rodriguez, Louis Eichel, Deepak Rajpoot.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To compare the initial results of robotic-assisted laparoscopic versus open pyeloplasty in children with ureteropelvic junction obstruction.
METHODS: From June 2002 to July 2004, 8 pediatric patients underwent robotic-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty and were matched by age group with patients undergoing conventional open pyeloplasty. The mean age was 11.5 years (range 6.4 to 16.5) in the robotic-assisted group and 9.8 years (range 6.0 to 15.6) in the open group. A four-port transperitoneal technique was used to perform the Anderson-Hynes pyeloplasty with the da Vinci Surgical System.
RESULTS: The mean operative time and estimated blood loss was 363 minutes (range 255 to 522) and 13.1 mL (range 5 to 25) in the robotic-assisted group versus 248 minutes (range 144 to 375) and 53.8 mL (range 5 to 200) in the open group, respectively. The mean length of hospitalization and pain medication use was 2.4 days (range 1 to 5) and 7.4 mg morphine (range 0 to 23) in the robotic-assisted group compared with 3.3 days (range 1 to 8) and 22.0 mg morphine (range 0 to 100) in the open group, respectively. At a mean follow-up of 14.7 months (range 2 to 24), all robotic procedures were successful as determined by subjective data using pain scales and radiologic data.
CONCLUSIONS: Robotic-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty appears to decrease the length of hospitalization and use of pain medication, but has a longer operative time. Additional clinical experience is required to determine the long-term efficacy of this method.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16504272     DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2005.09.021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  30 in total

1.  Pediatric Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty.

Authors:  Michael V Hollis; Patricia S Cho; Richard N Yu
Journal:  Am J Robot Surg       Date:  2015-12

2.  Evaluation of robotic-assisted laparoscopic and open pyeloplasty in children: single-surgeon experience.

Authors:  P Murthy; J A Cohn; M S Gundeti
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 1.891

Review 3.  Current status of robotic surgery in pediatric urology.

Authors:  Asif Muneer; Manit Arya; Iqbal S Shergill; Davendra Sharma; Mohammed Y Hammadeh; Imran Mushtaq
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2008-07-31       Impact factor: 1.827

Review 4.  Robotic surgery in pediatric urology.

Authors:  Jason P Van Batavia; Pasquale Casale
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 3.092

5.  Instituting robotic pediatric urologic surgery in the Canadian healthcare system: Evaluating the feasibility and outcomes of robot-assisted pyeloplasty and ureteric reimplantation.

Authors:  Noah Stern; Peter Wang; Sumit Dave
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2021-04       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 6.  Robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty in the pediatric population: a review of technique, outcomes, complications, and special considerations in infants.

Authors:  William R Boysen; Mohan S Gundeti
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2017-04-01       Impact factor: 1.827

Review 7.  Robotic assisted laparoscopic Mitrofanoff appendicovesicostomy (RALMA).

Authors:  Olufenwa Famakinwa; Mohan S Gundeti
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 3.092

8.  Can proctoring affect the learning curve of robotic-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty? Experience at a high-volume pediatric robotic surgery center.

Authors:  Diana K Bowen; Bruce W Lindgren; Earl Y Cheng; Edward M Gong
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2016-06-24

Review 9.  Comparing the efficacy and safety between robotic-assisted versus open pyeloplasty in children: a systemic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Shang-Jen Chang; Chun-Kai Hsu; Cheng-Hsing Hsieh; Stephen Shei-Dei Yang
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2015-03-10       Impact factor: 4.226

10.  How to successfully implement a robotic pediatric surgery program: lessons learned after 96 procedures.

Authors:  Guénolée de Lambert; Laurent Fourcade; Joachim Centi; Fabien Fredon; Karim Braik; Caroline Szwarc; Bernard Longis; Hubert Lardy
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-01-26       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.