Literature DB >> 11288010

A comparison of outcomes at 2 to 6 years after acute and chronic anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions using hamstring tendon grafts.

V K Goradia1, W A Grana.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare short- to intermediate-term outcomes of patients in whom an acute or chronic anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction was performed with a hamstring tendon graft. TYPE OF STUDY: A consecutive case series of patients who had 2-incision, arthroscopically assisted ACL reconstructions with a triple-strand hamstring tendon graft was retrospectively evaluated.
METHODS: A total of 120 patients were evaluated at a mean of 44 months. The Tegner Activity Scale, individual components of the Cincinnati Knee Rating System, and the modified Lysholm Score were administered to all patients. A total of 93 patients (78%) returned for examination, instrumented ligament laxity testing, radiographs, isokinetic strength testing, and completion of the IKDC Standard Knee Ligament Evaluation Form. Data from patients undergoing reconstructions for acute and chronic ACL deficiencies were compared. The acute group was defined as reconstruction within 6 weeks of injury without recurrent episodes of instability.
RESULTS: At surgery, significantly more (P <.05) cartilage abnormalities and partial medial menisectomies were found in the chronic group. At final follow-up, no significant differences (P >.05) were found between the acute and chronic groups for instrumented laxity, muscle strength, knee motion, or sports activity level. The acute group scored significantly higher (P <.05) on the Lysholm scale, Cincinnati Function scale, IKDC subjective assessment, and IKDC rating for pain at follow-up. The final IKDC grade resulted in significantly more (P =.039) normal knees for the acute group; however, 94.1% of acute and 92.9% of chronic knees were graded normal or nearly normal.
CONCLUSIONS: Hamstring tendons are an excellent graft choice for ACL reconstruction in both acute and chronic injuries. According to the strict IKDC rating system, greater than 90% of all patients can be expected to have a normal or nearly normal knee at short- to intermediate-term follow-up; however, the chronic group will have fewer patients with a rating of normal.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11288010     DOI: 10.1053/jars.2001.21493

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arthroscopy        ISSN: 0749-8063            Impact factor:   4.772


  17 in total

1.  Is height the best predictor for adequacy of semitendinosus-alone anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction? A study of hamstring graft dimensions and anthropometric measurements.

Authors:  S R Sundararajan; Ramakanth Rajagopalakrishnan; S Rajasekaran
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-07-10       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  ACL rupture and joint laxity progression: a quantitative in vivo analysis.

Authors:  C Signorelli; G Filardo; T Bonanzinga; A Grassi; S Zaffagnini; M Marcacci
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-06-07       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using in situ hamstring graft with 4 tunnels.

Authors:  Ahmad M Wagih
Journal:  Arthrosc Tech       Date:  2013-12-19

4.  Risk factors for knee instability after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Ji Hyun Ahn; Sung Hyun Lee
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-03-19       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  Anterior cruciate ligament insufficiency: does delay in index surgery affect outcome in recreational athletes.

Authors:  A D Tambe; S P Godsiff; S Mulay; M Joshi
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2006-02-24       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 6.  Anterior cruciate ligament tears: conservative or surgical treatment? A critical review of the literature.

Authors:  Philippe Delincé; Dior Ghafil
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-07-20       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  Meniscal and articular cartilage lesions in the anterior cruciate ligament-deficient knee: correlation between time from injury and knee scores.

Authors:  Sotirios Michalitsis; Mariana Vlychou; Konstantinos N Malizos; Paschal Thriskos; Michael E Hantes
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-04-18       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  Time from ACL injury to reconstruction and the prevalence of additional intra-articular pathology: is patient age an important factor?

Authors:  Robert A Magnussen; Angela D Pedroza; Christopher T Donaldson; David C Flanigan; Christopher C Kaeding
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-01-19       Impact factor: 4.342

9.  Hamstring graft size and anthropometry in south Indian population.

Authors:  Supradeeptha Challa; Jonnalagedda Satyaprasad
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2013-10-05

10.  Arthroscopic single-bundle posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: retrospective review of hamstring tendon graft versus LARS artificial ligament.

Authors:  Bin Li; Yu Wen; Haishan Wu; Qirong Qian; Yuli Wu; Xiangbo Lin
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2008-07-25       Impact factor: 3.075

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.