Literature DB >> 16499673

Quality of life of cancer patients receiving inpatient and home-based palliative care.

Louise Peters1, Ken Sellick.   

Abstract

AIMS: This paper reports a comparative study of the symptom experience, physical and psychological health, perceived control of the effects of cancer and quality of life of terminally ill cancer patients receiving inpatient and home-based palliative care, and the factors that predict quality of life.
BACKGROUND: Quality of life is a major goal in the care of patients with terminal cancer. In addition to symptom management, psychological care and provision of support, being cared for at home is considered an important determinant of patient well-being. A more comprehensive understanding of the impact of cancer on patients and their families will inform the delivery of palliative care services.
METHODS: Fifty-eight patients with terminal cancer (32 inpatients, 26 home-based) were recruited from major palliative care centres in Australia in 1999. A structured questionnaire designed to obtain sociodemographic information, medical details and standard measures of symptoms, physical and psychological health, personal control and quality of life was administered by personal interview.
RESULTS: The two groups were similar on most demographic measures, although more home-care patients were married, of Australian descent and had private health insurance cover. The most prevalent symptoms reported were weakness, fatigue, sleeping during the day and pain. Patients receiving home-based services had statistically significantly less symptom severity and distress, lower depression scores, and better physical health and quality of life than those receiving inpatient care. Home-care patients also reported statistically significantly more control over the effects of their illness, medical care and treatment received, and the course of the disease. Multiple regression analyses showed that better global physical health, greater control over the effects of cancer and lower depression scores were statistically significant predictors of higher quality of life.
CONCLUSIONS: The main issues arising from the findings for nurses are the early detection and management of both physical and psychological symptoms, particularly fatigue, pain, anxiety and depression, and the need to use strategies that will empower patients to have a greater sense of control over their illness and treatment. Research is needed to identify other factors that may impact on quality of life, and to establish the extent to which inpatient and home-based care meets the needs of both the patient with terminal cancer and their family.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16499673     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2006.03754.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Adv Nurs        ISSN: 0309-2402            Impact factor:   3.187


  41 in total

1.  Resilience, childhood disability and the Internet--case report.

Authors:  Marianne B Sutton; Stefanie Windischbauer; Evelyne Magali St John Sutton; Dietmar Weixler
Journal:  Wien Med Wochenschr       Date:  2010-07

2.  Hospice at home service: the carer's perspective.

Authors:  Dorry McLaughlin; Kate Sullivan; Felicity Hasson
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2006-08-30       Impact factor: 3.603

3.  Going home to die from surgical intensive care units.

Authors:  Yu-Chen Huang; Sheng-Jean Huang; Wen-Je Ko
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2009-03-12       Impact factor: 17.440

4.  Cancer patients' preferences for control at the end of life.

Authors:  Deborah L Volker; Hung-Lan Wu
Journal:  Qual Health Res       Date:  2011-07-06

Review 5.  Palliative Care Models for Cancer Patients: Learning for Planning in Nursing (Review).

Authors:  Hadi Hassankhani; Azad Rahmani; Fariba Taleghani; Zohreh Sanaat; Javad Dehghannezhad
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 2.037

6.  [Well-being of patients receiving specialized palliative care at home or in hospital].

Authors:  M Jansky; G Lindena; F Nauck
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 1.107

7.  Treatment adherence and patients' acceptance of home infusions with adenosine 5'-triphosphate (ATP) in palliative home care.

Authors:  Sandra Beijer; Nicole E G Wijckmans; Erik van Rossum; Cor Spreeuwenberg; Ron A G Winkens; Lisette Ars; Pieter C Dagnelie
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2008-09-23       Impact factor: 3.603

8.  Quality of life during first-line palliative chemotherapy for recurrent and metastatic head and neck cancer with weekly cisplatin and docetaxel.

Authors:  Orlando Guntinas-Lichius; Sarah Rühlow; Florian Veelken; Jens Peter Klussmann
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-12-16       Impact factor: 4.553

9.  End-of-life decision-making in Belgium, Denmark, Sweden and Switzerland: does place of death make a difference?

Authors:  Joachim Cohen; Johan Bilsen; Susanne Fischer; Rurik Löfmark; Michael Norup; Agnes van der Heide; Guido Miccinesi; Luc Deliens
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 3.710

10.  Dying from cancer or other chronic diseases in the Netherlands: ten-year trends derived from death certificate data.

Authors:  Lud F J van der Velden; Anneke L Francke; Lammert Hingstman; Dick L Willems
Journal:  BMC Palliat Care       Date:  2009-02-04       Impact factor: 3.234

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.