Literature DB >> 16495696

Can armrests improve comfort and task performance in laparoscopic surgery?

Raffaele Galleano1, Fiona Carter, Stuart Brown, Timothy Frank, Alfred Cuschieri.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The study sought to determine whether the support provided by armrests influenced task quality, task efficiency, and surgeon comfort during laparoscopic surgery. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Complex laparoscopic surgery requires precise movements, and usually long execution times and an uncomfortable stance. Discomfort in the shoulders, back, and neck is an established complaint among laparoscopic surgeons and is related to the unnatural postures adopted during laparoscopic interventions. Discomfort, and the associated fatigue, is a contributory factor in the execution of errors.
METHODS: Nineteen subjects completed a bimanual simulated laparoscopic task both with and without the aid of bilateral armrests. The task was completed in both an ideal unstressed posture and an uncomfortable, stressed elevated posture that more closely represents real laparoscopic operating conditions. Task duration was prolonged sufficiently to precipitate muscular fatigue. The participants also completed a visual analogue scale instrument on level of discomfort symptoms experienced in every part of the upper limbs and vertebral spine. Execution errors (task quality) and completion times (task efficiency) were recorded automatically by the laparoscopic simulator.
RESULTS: Error rates and discomfort measures were significantly improved when the armrests were used, but there was no significant change in task completion time.
CONCLUSIONS: The use of armrests in simulated laparoscopic surgery brings measurable comfort and task performance benefits, which could transfer to actual surgical procedures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16495696      PMCID: PMC1448939          DOI: 10.1097/01.sla.0000201481.08336.dc

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  18 in total

1.  Differences between experts and trainees in the motion pattern of the dominant upper limb during intracorporeal endoscopic knotting.

Authors:  T A Emam; G B Hanna; C Kimber; A Cuschieri
Journal:  Dig Surg       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 2.588

2.  Performing laparoscopic surgery is significantly more stressful for the surgeon than open surgery.

Authors:  R Berguer; W D Smith; Y H Chung
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Automated high-frequency posture sampling for ergonomic assessment of laparoscopic surgery.

Authors:  J G Person; A J Hodgson; A G Nagy
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2001-06-12       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Problems with laparoscopic instruments: opinions of experts.

Authors:  K T den Boer; T de Jong; J Dankelman; D J Gouma
Journal:  J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 1.878

5.  An ergonomic evaluation of surgeons' axial skeletal and upper extremity movements during laparoscopic and open surgery.

Authors:  N T Nguyen; H S Ho; W D Smith; C Philipps; C Lewis; R M De Vera; R Berguer
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 2.565

6.  Effect of fixation of shoulder and elbow joint movement on the precision of laparoscopic instrument manipulations.

Authors:  P V Patil; G B Hanna; T G Frank; A Cuschieri
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-11-25       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Influence of handle design on the surgeon's upper limb movements, muscle recruitment, and fatigue during endoscopic suturing.

Authors:  T A Emam; T G Frank; G B Hanna; A Cuschieri
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2001-05-11       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Effects of precision and force demands, grip diameter, and arm support during manual work: an electromyographic study.

Authors:  E Milerad; M O Ericson
Journal:  Ergonomics       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 2.778

9.  Postural and visual loads at VDT workplaces. I. Constrained postures.

Authors:  W Hünting; T Läubli; E Grandjean
Journal:  Ergonomics       Date:  1981-12       Impact factor: 2.778

10.  A new mobile armrest.

Authors:  M Gonvers; L Zografos
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  1981-03       Impact factor: 5.258

View more
  9 in total

1.  Comparison of two- and three-dimensional camera systems in laparoscopic performance: a novel 3D system with one camera.

Authors:  Seong-Ho Kong; Byung-Mo Oh; Hongman Yoon; Hye Seong Ahn; Hyuk-Joon Lee; Sun Geun Chung; Norio Shiraishi; Seigo Kitano; Han-Kwang Yang
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-11-13       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  "Alarm-corrected" ergonomic armrest use could improve learning curves of novices on robotic simulator.

Authors:  Kun Yang; Manuela Perez; Gabriela Hossu; Nicolas Hubert; Cyril Perrenot; Jacques Hubert
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-05-17       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Surgeon activity in robotic versus abdominal gynecologic surgery.

Authors:  Sarah A Collins; David M O'Sullivan; Paul K Tulikangas
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2011-10-20

4.  Energy consumption during simulated minimal access surgery with and without using an armrest.

Authors:  Mansoor Jafri; Stuart Brown; Graham Arnold; Rami Abboud; Weijie Wang
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-10-06       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Comparative assessment of surgeons' task performance and surgical ergonomics associated with conventional and modified flank positions: a simulation study.

Authors:  Yu Fan; Gaiqing Kong; Yisen Meng; Shutao Tan; Kunlin Wei; Qian Zhang; Jie Jin
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-06-14       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 6.  Whether robot-assisted laparoscopic fundoplication is better for gastroesophageal reflux disease in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jun Mi; Yingxin Kang; Xiao Chen; Bingjun Wang; Zhiping Wang
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-01-29       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Video-based method of quantifying performance and instrument motion during simulated phonosurgery.

Authors:  Ellen Conroy; Ketan Surender; Zhixian Geng; Ting Chen; Seth Dailey; Jack Jiang
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2014-06-26       Impact factor: 3.325

Review 8.  An Evaluation of the Effects of Human Factors and Ergonomics on Health Care and Patient Safety Practices: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Xuanyue Mao; Pengli Jia; Longhao Zhang; Pujing Zhao; Ying Chen; Mingming Zhang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-12       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Quantifying Intraoperative Workloads Across the Surgical Team Roles: Room for Better Balance?

Authors:  Denny Yu; Bethany Lowndes; Cornelius Thiels; Juliane Bingener; Amro Abdelrahman; Rebecca Lyons; Susan Hallbeck
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 3.352

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.