Literature DB >> 11441992

Problems with laparoscopic instruments: opinions of experts.

K T den Boer1, T de Jong, J Dankelman, D J Gouma.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Laparoscopic surgery is particularly known for its complex technique, which calls for operative analysis of laparoscopic instruments. This study investigates the opinion of experts about clinical problems with instruments occurring during laparoscopic surgery.
METHODS: A questionnaire was used to obtain the opinions of expert laparoscopic surgeons about difficulties experienced operatively using laparoscopic instruments.
RESULTS: The laparoscopic surgeons indicated that coagulators were especially prone to cause complications of the gastro-intestinal tract, vascular injuries, and bile duct injuries. Dissectors were considered to play a role in the occurrence of solid organ and bile duct injuries, and retractors to cause solid organ injuries. Insufficient functionality of the instruments and insufficient quality of the image were indicated to contribute to the instrument's risks.
CONCLUSION: The questionnaire identified technological deficiencies prone to cause operative complications. The results provide a basis for the interaction between surgeons and engineers, and serve as pilot information on which to base an in-depth object evaluation of instrument problems.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11441992     DOI: 10.1089/10926420152389297

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A        ISSN: 1092-6429            Impact factor:   1.878


  13 in total

1.  Clinically-driven approach to improve arthroscopic techniques.

Authors:  G J M Tuijthof; C N van Dijk; J L Herder; P V Pistecky
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2003-12-23       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Ergonomic problems encountered by the medical team related to products used for minimally invasive surgery.

Authors:  M A van Veelen; E A L Nederlof; R H M Goossens; C J Schot; J J Jakimowicz
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2003-05-06       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 3.  Surgical Efficacy Among Laparoscopic Ultrasonic Dissectors: Are We Advancing Safely? A Review of Literature.

Authors:  Rajesh Devassy; Sreelatha Gopalakrishnan; Rudy Leon De Wilde
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol India       Date:  2015-09-14

4.  The trade-off between flexibility and maneuverability: task performance with articulating laparoscopic instruments.

Authors:  Danny V Martinec; Prakash Gatta; Bin Zheng; Peter M Denk; Lee L Swanström
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-04-03       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Can a structured checklist prevent problems with laparoscopic equipment?

Authors:  E G G Verdaasdonk; L P S Stassen; W F Hoffmann; M van der Elst; J Dankelman
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-07-03       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Soft tissue elastography via shearing interferometry.

Authors:  Dominic Buchta; Hüseyin Serbes; Daniel Claus; Giancarlo Pedrini; Wolfgang Osten
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2018-11-02

7.  Tying different knots: what forces do we use?

Authors:  S P Rodrigues; T Horeman; J Dankelman; J J van den Dobbelsteen; F W Jansen
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-10-11       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Systems approach to reduce errors in surgery.

Authors:  J Dankelman; C A Grimbergen
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2005-07-14       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Inter- and intraindividual variabilities of perforation forces of human and pig bowel tissue.

Authors:  E A M Heijnsdijk; M van der Voort; H de Visser; J Dankelman; D J Gouma
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2003-10-23       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Can armrests improve comfort and task performance in laparoscopic surgery?

Authors:  Raffaele Galleano; Fiona Carter; Stuart Brown; Timothy Frank; Alfred Cuschieri
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 12.969

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.