Literature DB >> 16495349

The effect of gene flow on the coalescent time in the human-chimpanzee ancestral population.

Hideki Innan1, Hidemi Watanabe.   

Abstract

The coalescent process in the human-chimpanzee ancestral population is investigated using a model, which incorporates a certain time period of gene flow during the speciation process. a is a parameter to represent the degree and time of gene flow, and the model is identical to the null model with an instantaneous species split when a=infinity. A maximum likelihood (ML) method is developed to estimate a, and its power and reliability is investigated by coalescent simulations. The ML method is applied to nucleotide divergence data between human and chimpanzee. It is found that the null model with an instantaneous species split explains the data best, and no strong evidence for gene flow is detected. The result is discussed in the view of the mode of speciation. Another ML method is developed to estimate the male-female ratio (alpha) of mutation rate, in which the coalescent process in the ancestral population is taken into account.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16495349     DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msj109

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Biol Evol        ISSN: 0737-4038            Impact factor:   16.240


  20 in total

Review 1.  Molecular phylogenetics: principles and practice.

Authors:  Ziheng Yang; Bruce Rannala
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2012-03-28       Impact factor: 53.242

2.  Phylogenomics of primates and their ancestral populations.

Authors:  Adam Siepel
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2009-10-03       Impact factor: 9.043

3.  On computing the coalescence time density in an isolation-with-migration model with few samples.

Authors:  Asger Hobolth; Lars Nørvang Andersen; Thomas Mailund
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2011-02-14       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Efficient computation in the IM model.

Authors:  Lars Nørvang Andersen; Thomas Mailund; Asger Hobolth
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2013-04-16       Impact factor: 2.259

Review 5.  Structural divergence between the human and chimpanzee genomes.

Authors:  Hildegard Kehrer-Sawatzki; David N Cooper
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2006-10-26       Impact factor: 4.132

6.  Consistency and inconsistency of consensus methods for inferring species trees from gene trees in the presence of ancestral population structure.

Authors:  Michael DeGiorgio; Noah A Rosenberg
Journal:  Theor Popul Biol       Date:  2016-04-13       Impact factor: 1.570

7.  Female-to-male breeding ratio in modern humans-an analysis based on historical recombinations.

Authors:  Damian Labuda; Jean-François Lefebvre; Philippe Nadeau; Marie-Hélène Roy-Gagnon
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2010-02-25       Impact factor: 11.025

8.  Doubts about complex speciation between humans and chimpanzees.

Authors:  Daven C Presgraves; Soojin V Yi
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2009-08-05       Impact factor: 17.712

9.  A new approach to estimate parameters of speciation models with application to apes.

Authors:  Celine Becquet; Molly Przeworski
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2007-08-21       Impact factor: 9.043

10.  Widespread genomic signatures of natural selection in hominid evolution.

Authors:  Graham McVicker; David Gordon; Colleen Davis; Phil Green
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2009-05-08       Impact factor: 5.917

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.