Literature DB >> 16491409

Estimation of temporal resolution of object identification in human vision.

Risto Näsänen1, Helena Ojanpää, Topi Tanskanen, Juha Päällysaho.   

Abstract

The purpose of the study was to estimate the temporal processing capacity of human object identification under different stimulus conditions. Objects, either facial images or characters, were shown in a rapid sequence on a computer display using a rapid serial visual presentation (RSVP) method. One of the images was a target and the other images were distracters. The task of the observer was to identify the target. A staircase algorithm was used to determine the threshold frequency of image presentation in the RSVP sequence. The threshold frequency was determined as a function of image contrast, size, and mean luminance. The results showed that the threshold frequency, around 10 Hz for faces (100 ms per face) and about 25 Hz for characters (40 ms per character), was independent of contrast and size at medium and high contrast values, medium and large sizes, and high luminances, but decreased at very low contrasts or small sizes and medium or low levels of luminance. Computer simulations with a model, in which temporal integration limited perceptual speed, suggest that the experimentally found difference in processing time for faces and characters is not due to the physical differences of these stimulus types, but it seems that face-specific sites in the brain process facial information slower than object-specific areas process character information. Contrast, size, and luminance affect the signal-to-noise ratio and the temporal characteristics of low-level neural signal representation. Thus, the results suggest that at low contrasts, low luminances and small sizes, the processing speed of object identification is limited by low-level factors, while at high contrasts and luminances, and at large sizes, processing speed is limited by high-order processing stages. Processing speed seems to depend on stimulus type so that for faces processing is slower than for characters.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16491409     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-006-0354-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  25 in total

1.  Dynamics of letter string perception in the human occipitotemporal cortex.

Authors:  A Tarkiainen; P Helenius; P C Hansen; P L Cornelissen; R Salmelin
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 13.501

2.  Limits of attentive tracking reveal temporal properties of attention.

Authors:  F A Verstraten; P Cavanagh; A T Labianca
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Temporal tuning characteristics of the perceptual template and endogenous cuing of spatial attention.

Authors:  Zhong-Lin Lu; Seong-Taek Jeon; Barbara Anne Dosher
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Electrophysiological studies of human face perception. II: Response properties of face-specific potentials generated in occipitotemporal cortex.

Authors:  G McCarthy; A Puce; A Belger; T Allison
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  1999 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 5.357

5.  Speed of processing in the human visual system.

Authors:  S Thorpe; D Fize; C Marlot
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1996-06-06       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Changes in retinal time scale under background light: observations on rods and ganglion cells in the frog retina.

Authors:  K Donner; A Koskelainen; K Djupsund; S Hemilä
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  The dependence of response amplitude and variance of cat visual cortical neurones on stimulus contrast.

Authors:  D J Tolhurst; J A Movshon; I D Thompson
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1981       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  The speed of sight.

Authors:  C Keysers; D K Xiao; P Földiák; D I Perrett
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2001-01-01       Impact factor: 3.225

9.  Visual neurones responsive to faces in the monkey temporal cortex.

Authors:  D I Perrett; E T Rolls; W Caan
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  ENERGY, QUANTA, AND VISION.

Authors:  S Hecht; S Shlaer; M H Pirenne
Journal:  J Gen Physiol       Date:  1942-07-20       Impact factor: 4.086

View more
  4 in total

1.  Temporal Processing Capacity in High-Level Visual Cortex Is Domain Specific.

Authors:  Anthony Stigliani; Kevin S Weiner; Kalanit Grill-Spector
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2015-09-09       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  The dog's meow: asymmetrical interaction in cross-modal object recognition.

Authors:  Shlomit Yuval-Greenberg; Leon Y Deouell
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-12-06       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Inch-sized high-quality perovskite single crystals by suppressing phase segregation for light-powered integrated circuits.

Authors:  Yucheng Liu; Yunxia Zhang; Xuejie Zhu; Zhou Yang; Weijun Ke; Jiangshan Feng; Xiaodong Ren; Kui Zhao; Ming Liu; Mercouri G Kanatzidis; Shengzhong Frank Liu
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2021-02-10       Impact factor: 14.136

4.  Natural Contrast Statistics Facilitate Human Face Categorization.

Authors:  Joan Liu-Shuang; Yu-Fang Yang; Bruno Rossion; Valérie Goffaux
Journal:  eNeuro       Date:  2022-10-06
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.