Literature DB >> 18500525

MRI of the small bowel: can sufficient bowel distension be achieved with small volumes of oral contrast?

Sonja Kinner1, Christiane A Kuehle, Sebastian Herbig, Sebastian Haag, Susanne C Ladd, Joerg Barkhausen, Thomas C Lauenstein.   

Abstract

Sufficient luminal distension is mandatory for small bowel imaging. However, patients often are unable to ingest volumes of currently applied oral contrast compounds. The aim of this study was to evaluate if administration of low doses of an oral contrast agent with high-osmolarity leads to sufficient and diagnostic bowel distension. Six healthy volunteers ingested at different occasions 150, 300 and 450 ml of a commercially available oral contrast agent (Banana Smoothie Readi-Cat, E-Z-EM; 194 mOsmol/l). Two-dimensional TrueFISP data sets were acquired in 5-min intervals up to 45 min after contrast ingestion. Small bowel distension was quantified using a visual five-grade ranking (5 = very good distension, 1 = collapsed bowel). Results were statistically compared using a Wilcoxon-Rank test. Ingestion of 450 ml and 300 ml resulted in a significantly better distension than 150 ml. The all-over average distension value for 450 ml amounted to 3.4 (300 ml: 3.0, 150 ml: 2.3) and diagnostic bowel distension could be found throughout the small intestine. Even 45 min after ingestion of 450 ml the jejunum and ileum could be reliably analyzed. Small bowel imaging with low doses of contrast leads to diagnostic distension values in healthy subjects when a high-osmolarity substance is applied. These findings may help to further refine small bowel MRI techniques, but need to be confirmed in patients with small bowel disorders.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18500525     DOI: 10.1007/s00330-008-1041-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  22 in total

1.  Small bowel MRI using water as a contrast medium.

Authors:  D J Lomas; M J Graves
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Non-invasive distension of the small bowel for magnetic-resonance imaging.

Authors:  M A Patak; J M Froehlich; C von Weymarn; M A Ritz; C L Zollikofer; K Wentz
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2001-09-22       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 3.  Small bowel magnetic resonance imaging for inflammatory bowel disease.

Authors:  Klaus Schunk
Journal:  Top Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2002-12

4.  MR enteroclysis: technical considerations and clinical applications.

Authors:  Nicholas Gourtsoyiannis; Nickolas Papanikolaou; John Grammatikakis; Panos Prassopoulos
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2002-06-04       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 5.  Cross-sectional imaging in Crohn disease.

Authors:  Akira Furukawa; Takao Saotome; Michio Yamasaki; Kiyosumi Maeda; Norihisa Nitta; Masashi Takahashi; Tomoyuki Tsujikawa; Yoshihide Fujiyama; Kiyoshi Murata; Tsutomu Sakamoto
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2004 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.333

6.  Crohn disease of the small intestine: accuracy and relevance of enteroclysis.

Authors:  D D Maglinte; S M Chernish; F M Kelvin; K W O'Connor; J P Hage
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  MR imaging of the small bowel with a true-FISP sequence after enteroclysis with water solution.

Authors:  N Gourtsoyiannis; N Papanikolaou; J Grammatikakis; T Maris; P Prassopoulos
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 6.016

8.  Contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of the terminal ileum in children with Crohn's disease.

Authors:  A Laghi; O Borrelli; P Paolantonio; L Dito; M Buena de Mesquita; P Falconieri; R Passariello; S Cucchiara
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 23.059

9.  Bowel magnetic resonance imaging of pediatric patients with oral mannitol MRI compared to endoscopy and intestinal ultrasound.

Authors:  Arne S Borthne; Michael Abdelnoor; Jarle Rugtveit; Göri Perminow; Tor Reiseter; Nils-Einar Kløw
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2005-06-08       Impact factor: 5.315

10.  Small bowel MRI: comparison of a polyethylene glycol preparation and water as oral contrast media.

Authors:  Rohit R Sood; Ilse Joubert; Hilary Franklin; Terence Doyle; David J Lomas
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 4.813

View more
  8 in total

1.  Comparison of 3% sorbitol vs psyllium fibre as oral contrast agents in MR enterography.

Authors:  Sidharth Saini; Errol Colak; Shalini Anthwal; Paraskevi A Vlachou; Antony Raikhlin; Anish Kirpalani
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2014-07-25       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 2.  The Role of Magnetic Resonance Enterography in Crohn's Disease: A Review of Recent Literature.

Authors:  Marysol Biondi; Eleonora Bicci; Ginevra Danti; Federica Flammia; Giuditta Chiti; Pierpaolo Palumbo; Federico Bruno; Alessandra Borgheresi; Roberta Grassi; Francesca Grassi; Roberta Fusco; Vincenza Granata; Andrea Giovagnoni; Antonio Barile; Vittorio Miele
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-15

3.  Small bowel MRI enteroclysis or follow through: which is optimal?

Authors:  Ian C Lawrance; Christopher J Welman; Peter Shipman; Kevin Murray
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-11-14       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 4.  Gastrointestinal imaging-practical magnetic resonance imaging approach.

Authors:  Baodong Liu; Miguel Ramalho; Mamdoh AlObaidy; Kiran K Busireddy; Ersan Altun; Janaka Kalubowila; Richard C Semelka
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2014-08-28

5.  A prospective randomized controlled study of erythromycin on gastric and small intestinal distention: implications for MR enterography.

Authors:  Adil E Bharucha; Jeff L Fidler; James E Huprich; Shiva K Ratuapli; David R Holmes; Stephen J Riederer; Alan R Zinsmeister
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2014-08-17       Impact factor: 3.528

Review 6.  How we do it: MR enterography.

Authors:  Mary-Louise C Greer
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2016-05-26

7.  Indications and selection of MR enterography vs. MR enteroclysis with emphasis on patients who need small bowel MRI and general anaesthesia: results of a survey.

Authors:  Michael R Torkzad; Gabriele Masselli; Steve Halligan; Aytek Oto; Henning Neubauer; Stuart Taylor; Arun Gupta; Jens Brøndum Frøkjær; Ian C Lawrance; Christopher J Welman; Anne Negård; Olle Ekberg; Michael Patak; Thomas Lauenstein
Journal:  Insights Imaging       Date:  2015-04-09

8.  The first joint ESGAR/ ESPR consensus statement on the technical performance of cross-sectional small bowel and colonic imaging.

Authors:  S A Taylor; F Avni; C G Cronin; C Hoeffel; S H Kim; A Laghi; M Napolitano; P Petit; J Rimola; D J Tolan; M R Torkzad; M Zappa; G Bhatnagar; C A J Puylaert; J Stoker
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2016-10-18       Impact factor: 5.315

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.