Literature DB >> 16490367

Affective response to one's own moral violations.

S Berthoz1, J Grèzes, J L Armony, R E Passingham, R J Dolan.   

Abstract

Morality depends on a set of cultural rules that regulate interpersonal behaviour and provide a basis for social cohesion. The interpretation of moral transgressions and their affective consequences depends on whether the action is intentional or accidental, and whether one is the agent of or witness to the action. We used event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to investigate whether the amygdala is involved in judging one's own moral violation of social norms. In this study, participants (n = 12) were asked to make evaluations regarding the degree of inappropriateness of social behaviours described in stories in which they themselves, or someone else, transgressed social norms either intentionally or accidentally. Consistent with our hypothesis, the amygdala was activated when participants considered stories narrating their own intentional transgression of social norms. This result suggests the amygdala is important for affective responsiveness to moral transgressions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16490367     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.12.039

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  36 in total

1.  Harming kin to save strangers: further evidence for abnormally utilitarian moral judgments after ventromedial prefrontal damage.

Authors:  Bradley C Thomas; Katie E Croft; Daniel Tranel
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2010-10-14       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Can beneficial ends justify lying? Neural responses to the passive reception of lies and truth-telling with beneficial and harmful monetary outcomes.

Authors:  Lijun Yin; Bernd Weber
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2015-10-10       Impact factor: 3.436

Review 3.  Neural foundations to moral reasoning and antisocial behavior.

Authors:  Adrian Raine; Yaling Yang
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 3.436

4.  Behavioral norms for condensed moral vignettes.

Authors:  Kristine M Knutson; Frank Krueger; Michael Koenigs; Angelina Hawley; Jessica R Escobedo; Viren Vasudeva; Ralph Adolphs; Jordan Grafman
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2010-02-12       Impact factor: 3.436

Review 5.  The neurobiology of moral behavior: review and neuropsychiatric implications.

Authors:  Mario F Mendez
Journal:  CNS Spectr       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 3.790

6.  Predicting the brain activation pattern associated with the propositional content of a sentence: Modeling neural representations of events and states.

Authors:  Jing Wang; Vladimir L Cherkassky; Marcel Adam Just
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2017-06-27       Impact factor: 5.038

7.  Roman Catholic beliefs produce characteristic neural responses to moral dilemmas.

Authors:  Julia F Christensen; Albert Flexas; Pedro de Miguel; Camilo J Cela-Conde; Enric Munar
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2012-11-18       Impact factor: 3.436

8.  The neural correlates of justified and unjustified killing: an fMRI study.

Authors:  Pascal Molenberghs; Claudette Ogilvie; Winnifred R Louis; Jean Decety; Jessica Bagnall; Paul G Bain
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2015-03-09       Impact factor: 3.436

9.  Neurobiological underpinnings of shame and guilt: a pilot fMRI study.

Authors:  Petra Michl; Thomas Meindl; Franziska Meister; Christine Born; Rolf R Engel; Maximilian Reiser; Kristina Hennig-Fast
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2012-10-09       Impact factor: 3.436

Review 10.  Conceptualising spirituality for medical research and health service provision.

Authors:  Michael B King; Harold G Koenig
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2009-07-13       Impact factor: 2.655

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.