Literature DB >> 23160812

Roman Catholic beliefs produce characteristic neural responses to moral dilemmas.

Julia F Christensen1, Albert Flexas, Pedro de Miguel, Camilo J Cela-Conde, Enric Munar.   

Abstract

This study provides exploratory evidence about how behavioral and neural responses to standard moral dilemmas are influenced by religious belief. Eleven Catholics and 13 Atheists (all female) judged 48 moral dilemmas. Differential neural activity between the two groups was found in precuneus and in prefrontal, frontal and temporal regions. Furthermore, a double dissociation showed that Catholics recruited different areas for deontological (precuneus; temporoparietal junction) and utilitarian moral judgments [dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC); temporal poles], whereas Atheists did not (superior parietal gyrus for both types of judgment). Finally, we tested how both groups responded to personal and impersonal moral dilemmas: Catholics showed enhanced activity in DLPFC and posterior cingulate cortex during utilitarian moral judgments to impersonal moral dilemmas and enhanced responses in anterior cingulate cortex and superior temporal sulcus during deontological moral judgments to personal moral dilemmas. Our results indicate that moral judgment can be influenced by an acquired set of norms and conventions transmitted through religious indoctrination and practice. Catholic individuals may hold enhanced awareness of the incommensurability between two unequivocal doctrines of the Catholic belief set, triggered explicitly in a moral dilemma: help and care in all circumstances-but thou shalt not kill.

Keywords:  DLPFC; moral dilemmas; moral emotions; moral judgment; religion

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23160812      PMCID: PMC3907925          DOI: 10.1093/scan/nss121

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci        ISSN: 1749-5016            Impact factor:   3.436


  46 in total

1.  Stochastic designs in event-related fMRI.

Authors:  K J Friston; E Zarahn; O Josephs; R N Henson; A M Dale
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 6.556

2.  The royal free interview for spiritual and religious beliefs: development and validation of a self-report version.

Authors:  M King; P Speck; A Thomas
Journal:  Psychol Med       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 7.723

3.  How (and where) does moral judgment work?

Authors:  Joshua Greene; Jonathan Haidt
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2002-12-01       Impact factor: 20.229

4.  An automated method for neuroanatomic and cytoarchitectonic atlas-based interrogation of fMRI data sets.

Authors:  Joseph A Maldjian; Paul J Laurienti; Robert A Kraft; Jonathan H Burdette
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  Moral emotions and moral behavior.

Authors:  June Price Tangney; Jeff Stuewig; Debra J Mashek
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 24.137

6.  The mismeasure of morals: antisocial personality traits predict utilitarian responses to moral dilemmas.

Authors:  Daniel M Bartels; David A Pizarro
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2011-07-16

7.  The role of moral commitments in moral judgment.

Authors:  Tania Lombrozo
Journal:  Cogn Sci       Date:  2009-03

8.  An FMRI investigation of spontaneous mental state inference for moral judgment.

Authors:  Liane Young; Rebecca Saxe
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 9.  The neural basis of moral cognition: sentiments, concepts, and values.

Authors:  Jorge Moll; Ricardo De Oliveira-Souza; Roland Zahn
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 5.691

10.  The empathy quotient: an investigation of adults with Asperger syndrome or high functioning autism, and normal sex differences.

Authors:  Simon Baron-Cohen; Sally Wheelwright
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2004-04
View more
  3 in total

1.  Neural bases of antisocial behavior: a voxel-based meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yuta Aoki; Ryota Inokuchi; Tomohiro Nakao; Hidenori Yamasue
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2013-08-06       Impact factor: 3.436

2.  Neuromoral Diversity: Individual, Gender, and Cultural Differences in the Ethical Brain.

Authors:  Geoffrey S Holtzman
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2017-10-31       Impact factor: 3.169

3.  Moral judgment reloaded: a moral dilemma validation study.

Authors:  Julia F Christensen; Albert Flexas; Margareta Calabrese; Nadine K Gut; Antoni Gomila
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-07-01
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.