Literature DB >> 20154053

Behavioral norms for condensed moral vignettes.

Kristine M Knutson1, Frank Krueger, Michael Koenigs, Angelina Hawley, Jessica R Escobedo, Viren Vasudeva, Ralph Adolphs, Jordan Grafman.   

Abstract

Moral judgment is an evaluation of the actions and character of a person made with respect to societal norms. Although many types of vignettes have been used in previous studies on moral beliefs and judgment, what is missing is a set of standardized common vignettes based in real life. The goal of this study was to provide researchers with stimuli that have values on several dimensions pertaining to moral judgment and whose underlying components are known. These values will allow researchers to select stimuli based on standardized ratings rather than on the results of pilot studies, while avoiding the limitations of the classic, abstract moral scenarios. Our study was composed of three phases, (i) collecting and shortening the vignettes, (ii) obtaining ratings of the vignettes on several dimensions including emotional intensity, degree of social norm violation, and level of harm or benefit caused and (iii) determining the underlying components of the vignettes by performing a factor analysis. We found three components that accounted for most of the variance: norm violation, social affect and intention. The resulting vignettes can be used in future parametric studies on moral judgment in behavioral, neuropsychological and functional imaging experiments.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20154053      PMCID: PMC2999756          DOI: 10.1093/scan/nsq005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci        ISSN: 1749-5016            Impact factor:   3.436


  23 in total

1.  Frontopolar and anterior temporal cortex activation in a moral judgment task: preliminary functional MRI results in normal subjects.

Authors:  J Moll; P J Eslinger; R Oliveira-Souza
Journal:  Arq Neuropsiquiatr       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 1.420

2.  How (and where) does moral judgment work?

Authors:  Joshua Greene; Jonathan Haidt
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2002-12-01       Impact factor: 20.229

Review 3.  Moral cognition and its neural constituents.

Authors:  William D Casebeer
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 34.870

4.  An fMRI study of simple ethical decision-making.

Authors:  Hauke R Heekeren; Isabell Wartenburger; Helge Schmidt; Hans-Peter Schwintowski; Arno Villringer
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2003-07-01       Impact factor: 1.837

5.  The neural bases of cognitive conflict and control in moral judgment.

Authors:  Joshua D Greene; Leigh E Nystrom; Andrew D Engell; John M Darley; Jonathan D Cohen
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2004-10-14       Impact factor: 17.173

6.  The effects of bilateral lesions of the amygdala on dyadic social interactions in rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta).

Authors:  N J Emery; J P Capitanio; W A Mason; C J Machado; S P Mendoza; D G Amaral
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 1.912

Review 7.  Opinion: the neural basis of human moral cognition.

Authors:  Jorge Moll; Roland Zahn; Ricardo de Oliveira-Souza; Frank Krueger; Jordan Grafman
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 34.870

8.  The neural correlates of moral sensitivity: a functional magnetic resonance imaging investigation of basic and moral emotions.

Authors:  Jorge Moll; Ricardo de Oliveira-Souza; Paul J Eslinger; Ivanei E Bramati; Janaína Mourão-Miranda; Pedro Angelo Andreiuolo; Luiz Pessoa
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2002-04-01       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  The neural basis of the interaction between theory of mind and moral judgment.

Authors:  Liane Young; Fiery Cushman; Marc Hauser; Rebecca Saxe
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-05-07       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Individual differences in moral judgment competence influence neural correlates of socio-normative judgments.

Authors:  Kristin Prehn; Isabell Wartenburger; Katja Mériau; Christina Scheibe; Oliver R Goodenough; Arno Villringer; Elke van der Meer; Hauke R Heekeren
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2007-12-03       Impact factor: 3.436

View more
  7 in total

1.  Nonprice incentives and energy conservation.

Authors:  Omar I Asensio; Magali A Delmas
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-01-12       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Parsing the neural correlates of moral cognition: ALE meta-analysis on morality, theory of mind, and empathy.

Authors:  Danilo Bzdok; Leonhard Schilbach; Kai Vogeley; Karla Schneider; Angela R Laird; Robert Langner; Simon B Eickhoff
Journal:  Brain Struct Funct       Date:  2012-01-24       Impact factor: 3.270

3.  What we say and what we do: the relationship between real and hypothetical moral choices.

Authors:  Oriel FeldmanHall; Dean Mobbs; Davy Evans; Lucy Hiscox; Lauren Navrady; Tim Dalgleish
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2012-03-09

Review 4.  Sidetracked by trolleys: Why sacrificial moral dilemmas tell us little (or nothing) about utilitarian judgment.

Authors:  Guy Kahane
Journal:  Soc Neurosci       Date:  2015-03-20       Impact factor: 2.083

5.  The Socio-Moral Image Database (SMID): A novel stimulus set for the study of social, moral and affective processes.

Authors:  Damien L Crone; Stefan Bode; Carsten Murawski; Simon M Laham
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-01-24       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  How embarrassing! The behavioral and neural correlates of processing social norm violations.

Authors:  Janna Marie Bas-Hoogendam; Henk van Steenbergen; Tanja Kreuk; Nic J A van der Wee; P Michiel Westenberg
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-04-25       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  The outlandish, the realistic, and the real: contextual manipulation and agent role effects in trolley problems.

Authors:  Natalie Gold; Briony D Pulford; Andrew M Colman
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-01-30
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.