Literature DB >> 14560183

General principles of total disc replacement arthroplasty: seventeen cases in a nonhuman primate model.

Bryan W Cunningham1, Anton E Dmitriev, Nianbin Hu, Paul C McAfee.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: To investigate the biomechanical, histochemical, and biologic ingrowth characteristics of two different lumbar disc prostheses-AcroFlex (DePuy-AcroMed) and the SB Charitè (DePuy-AcroMed)-for total disc replacement arthroplasty.
METHODS: A total of 17 mature baboons (n = 17, Papio cynocephalus) underwent L5-L6 total disc replacement procedures. The AcroFlex device (n = 10 levels) consisted of sintered titanium beaded ingrowth surfaces, bound together by a hexene-based polyolefin rubber core. The SB Charitè (n = 7 levels) device prosthetic vertebral end plates were cobalt chrome, covered by two layers of thin titanium with an electrochemically bonded hydroxyapatite coating and an ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene core.
RESULTS: Following 6-month survival periods, the range of motion of the SB Charitè and intact nonoperative controls under axial compression, flexion-extension, and lateral bending showed no statistical difference (P > 0.05). However, both exhibited greater range of motion compared to the AcroFlex treatments (P < 0.05). Plain film radiographic analysis showed no lucencies or loosening of any metallic prosthetic vertebral endplate. Gross histopathologic analysis of the AcroFlex and SB Charité prosthesis demonstrated excellent ingrowth at the level of the implant-bone interface, without evidence of fibrous tissue or synovium. Histochemical assays showed no local or systemic accumulation of particulate wear debris (titanium, ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene, or cobalt chrome) nor cytokines (TNF-alpha, PGE2, IL-1, IL-2, or IL-6). Porous ingrowth calculations showed the mean ingrowth (linear apposition) ranging from 47.9% +/- 9.12 for the SB Charitè device and 54.59% +/- 13.24 for the AcroFlex device.
CONCLUSIONS: The porous ingrowth, percentage pore ingrowth coverage at the bone-metal interface was more favorable for total disc replacement compared to that reported for cementless total joint components in the appendicular skeleton (range 10-30%). The reason for the improved degree of porous ingrowth in total disc replacement prostheses is probably due to ligamentotaxis causing sustained compression across the metal-bone interface. This project serves as the first comprehensive in vivo investigation comparing two different types of unconstrained disc prostheses with alternate in-growth surfaces and establishes an excellent research model in the evaluation of lumbar total disc replacement arthroplasty.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14560183     DOI: 10.1097/00007632-200310151-00005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  18 in total

Review 1.  Cervical and lumbar spinal arthroplasty: clinical review.

Authors:  T D Uschold; D Fusco; R Germain; L M Tumialan; S W Chang
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2011-10-27       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 2.  [Cervical disc prostheses].

Authors:  E W Fritsch; T Pitzen
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 3.  Design concepts in lumbar total disc arthroplasty.

Authors:  Fabio Galbusera; Chiara M Bellini; Thomas Zweig; Stephen Ferguson; Manuela T Raimondi; Claudio Lamartina; Marco Brayda-Bruno; Maurizio Fornari
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2008-10-23       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 4.  Which design and biomaterial factors affect clinical wear performance of total disc replacements? A systematic review.

Authors:  Sai Y Veruva; Marla J Steinbeck; Jeffrey Toth; Dominik D Alexander; Steven M Kurtz
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 5.  Biomaterials for intervertebral disc regeneration and repair.

Authors:  Robert D Bowles; Lori A Setton
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2017-03-15       Impact factor: 12.479

6.  [Total cervical disk replacement--implant-specific approaches: keel implant (Prodisc-C intervertebral disk prosthesis)].

Authors:  Andreas Korge; Christoph J Siepe; Franziska Heider; H Michael Mayer
Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 1.154

7.  Biotribological evaluation of artificial disc arthroplasty devices: influence of loading and kinematic patterns during in vitro wear simulation.

Authors:  Thomas M Grupp; James J Yue; Rolando Garcia; Janet Basson; Jens Schwiesau; Bernhard Fritz; Wilhelm Blömer
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2008-12-03       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Mature runt cow lumbar intradiscal pressures and motion segment biomechanics.

Authors:  Glenn Robin Buttermann; Brian P Beaubien; Louis C Saeger
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2007-11-26       Impact factor: 4.166

9.  What is the correlation of in vivo wear and damage patterns with in vitro TDR motion response?

Authors:  Steven M Kurtz; Avinash Patwardhan; Daniel MacDonald; Lauren Ciccarelli; André van Ooij; Mark Lorenz; Michael Zindrick; Patrick O'Leary; Jorge Isaza; Raymond Ross
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2008-03-01       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  Biomechanical characterization of an annulus-sparing spinal disc prosthesis.

Authors:  Glenn R Buttermann; Brian P Beaubien
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2009-06-21       Impact factor: 4.166

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.