Literature DB >> 16488978

Shaping up the protein folding funnel by local interaction: lesson from a structure prediction study.

George Chikenji1, Yoshimi Fujitsuka, Shoji Takada.   

Abstract

Predicting protein tertiary structure by folding-like simulations is one of the most stringent tests of how much we understand the principle of protein folding. Currently, the most successful method for folding-based structure prediction is the fragment assembly (FA) method. Here, we address why the FA method is so successful and its lesson for the folding problem. To do so, using the FA method, we designed a structure prediction test of "chimera proteins." In the chimera proteins, local structural preference is specific to the target sequences, whereas nonlocal interactions are only sequence-independent compaction forces. We find that these chimera proteins can find the native folds of the intact sequences with high probability indicating dominant roles of the local interactions. We further explore roles of local structural preference by exact calculation of the HP lattice model of proteins. From these results, we suggest principles of protein folding: For small proteins, compact structures that are fully compatible with local structural preference are few, one of which is the native fold. These local biases shape up the funnel-like energy landscape.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16488978      PMCID: PMC1413881          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0508195103

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  51 in total

1.  A theoretical search for folding/unfolding nuclei in three-dimensional protein structures.

Authors:  O V Galzitskaya; A V Finkelstein
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-09-28       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Free energy landscapes of peptides by enhanced conformational sampling.

Authors:  N Nakajima; J Higo; A Kidera; H Nakamura
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2000-02-11       Impact factor: 5.469

3.  Roles of native topology and chain-length scaling in protein folding: a simulation study with a Go-like model.

Authors:  N Koga; S Takada
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2001-10-12       Impact factor: 5.469

4.  Predicting interresidue contacts using templates and pathways.

Authors:  Yu Shao; Christopher Bystroff
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2003

5.  De novo design of foldable proteins with smooth folding funnel: automated negative design and experimental verification.

Authors:  Wenzhen Jin; Ohki Kambara; Hiroaki Sasakawa; Atsuo Tamura; Shoji Takada
Journal:  Structure       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 5.006

6.  Structural characterization of unfolded states of apomyoglobin using residual dipolar couplings.

Authors:  Ronaldo Mohana-Borges; Natalie K Goto; Gerard J A Kroon; H Jane Dyson; Peter E Wright
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2004-07-23       Impact factor: 5.469

7.  Protein design: a perspective from simple tractable models

Authors: 
Journal:  Fold Des       Date:  1998

Review 8.  The concept of a random coil. Residual structure in peptides and denatured proteins.

Authors:  L J Smith; K M Fiebig; H Schwalbe; C M Dobson
Journal:  Fold Des       Date:  1996

9.  De novo protein design: fully automated sequence selection.

Authors:  B I Dahiyat; S L Mayo
Journal:  Science       Date:  1997-10-03       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Origins of structure in globular proteins.

Authors:  H S Chan; K A Dill
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  22 in total

1.  Protein loop modeling by using fragment assembly and analytical loop closure.

Authors:  Julian Lee; Dongseon Lee; Hahnbeom Park; Evangelos A Coutsias; Chaok Seok
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2010-09-24

2.  Secondary structure determines protein topology.

Authors:  Patrick J Fleming; Haipeng Gong; George D Rose
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2006-07-05       Impact factor: 6.725

3.  Probing protein fold space with a simplified model.

Authors:  Peter Minary; Michael Levitt
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2007-11-09       Impact factor: 5.469

4.  Compensatory mutations are repeatable and clustered within proteins.

Authors:  Brad H Davis; Art F Y Poon; Michael C Whitlock
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-02-25       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Folding energy landscape and network dynamics of small globular proteins.

Authors:  Naoto Hori; George Chikenji; R Stephen Berry; Shoji Takada
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-12-29       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 6.  The protein folding problem.

Authors:  Ken A Dill; S Banu Ozkan; M Scott Shell; Thomas R Weikl
Journal:  Annu Rev Biophys       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 12.981

7.  A generative, probabilistic model of local protein structure.

Authors:  Wouter Boomsma; Kanti V Mardia; Charles C Taylor; Jesper Ferkinghoff-Borg; Anders Krogh; Thomas Hamelryck
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-06-25       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Automated real-space refinement of protein structures using a realistic backbone move set.

Authors:  Esmael J Haddadian; Haipeng Gong; Abhishek K Jha; Xiaojing Yang; Joe Debartolo; James R Hinshaw; Phoebe A Rice; Tobin R Sosnick; Karl F Freed
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2011-08-17       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 9.  The loop hypothesis: contribution of early formed specific non-local interactions to the determination of protein folding pathways.

Authors:  Tomer Orevi; Gil Rahamim; Gershon Hazan; Dan Amir; Elisha Haas
Journal:  Biophys Rev       Date:  2013-04-12

10.  Principles for designing ideal protein structures.

Authors:  Nobuyasu Koga; Rie Tatsumi-Koga; Gaohua Liu; Rong Xiao; Thomas B Acton; Gaetano T Montelione; David Baker
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2012-11-08       Impact factor: 49.962

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.