Literature DB >> 16487946

Two separate mechanisms underlie auditory change detection and involuntary control of attention.

Teemu Rinne1, Anna Särkkä, Alexander Degerman, Erich Schröger, Kimmo Alho.   

Abstract

We used behavioral and event-related potential (ERP) measures to study the neural mechanisms of involuntary attention switching to changes in unattended sounds. Our subjects discriminated two equiprobable sounds differing in frequency (fundamental frequency 186 or 196 Hz) while task-irrelevant intensity decrements or increments (-3, -6, -9, +3, +6, or +9 dB, standard intensity 60 dB HL) infrequently occurred in the same sounds. In line with the results of previous studies, discrimination performance deteriorated with increasing magnitude of the task-irrelevant intensity change. However, these distraction effects were dissimilar for intensity increments and decrements: while there were no differences in reaction time (RT) between intensity decrements and increments, hit rates (HR) were lower for large intensity increments than for large decrements. ERPs to task-irrelevant intensity increments and decrements were also distinctly different: the response to intensity increments consisted of an N1 enhancement, mismatch negativity (MMN), and P3a, while the response to intensity decrements consisted only of MMN. These results are consistent with the assumption that two separate mechanisms (indexed by N1 and MMN) underlie auditory change detection. However, the finding that distinct distraction effects were obtained for both intensity decrements and increments but that the P3a is elicited only by the intensity increments seems to suggest that P3a may not be regarded as a general index of attentional shift but rather it is only generated in conditions in which an enhanced N1 is elicited, too.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16487946     DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2006.01.043

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Res        ISSN: 0006-8993            Impact factor:   3.252


  43 in total

1.  Selective attention to pitch amid conflicting auditory information: context-coding and filtering strategies.

Authors:  Blas Espinoza-Varas; Hyunsook Jang
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2010-07-17

2.  Distributed cortical networks for focused auditory attention and distraction.

Authors:  Teemu Rinne; Siiri Kirjavainen; Oili Salonen; Alexander Degerman; Xiaojian Kang; David L Woods; Kimmo Alho
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2007-02-24       Impact factor: 3.046

Review 3.  The cognitive determinants of behavioral distraction by deviant auditory stimuli: a review.

Authors:  Fabrice B R Parmentier
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2013-12-21

4.  Converging evidence for [coronal] underspecification in English-speaking adults.

Authors:  Alycia Cummings; John Madden; Kathryn Hefta
Journal:  J Neurolinguistics       Date:  2017-05-29       Impact factor: 1.710

5.  A Comparison of Auditory Oddball Responses in Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex, Basolateral Amygdala, and Auditory Cortex of Macaque.

Authors:  Corrie R Camalier; Kaylee Scarim; Mortimer Mishkin; Bruno B Averbeck
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2019-03-18       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  The event-related potential component P3a is diminished by identical deviance repetition, but not by non-identical repetitions.

Authors:  Timm Rosburg; Michael Weigl; Ronja Thiel; Ralph Mager
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2018-03-22       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Ketamine Affects Prediction Errors about Statistical Regularities: A Computational Single-Trial Analysis of the Mismatch Negativity.

Authors:  Lilian A Weber; Andreea O Diaconescu; Christoph Mathys; André Schmidt; Michael Kometer; Franz Vollenweider; Klaas E Stephan
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2020-06-19       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Heightened early-attentional stimulus orienting and impulsive action in men with antisocial personality disorder.

Authors:  Marijn Lijffijt; Scott D Lane; Sanjay J Mathew; Matthew S Stanford; Alan C Swann
Journal:  Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci       Date:  2016-09-23       Impact factor: 5.270

9.  Non-linear laws of echoic memory and auditory change detection in humans.

Authors:  Koji Inui; Tomokazu Urakawa; Koya Yamashiro; Naofumi Otsuru; Makoto Nishihara; Yasuyuki Takeshima; Sumru Keceli; Ryusuke Kakigi
Journal:  BMC Neurosci       Date:  2010-07-03       Impact factor: 3.288

10.  Preattentive sensory processing as indexed by the MMN and P3a brain responses is associated with cognitive and psychosocial functioning in healthy adults.

Authors:  Gregory A Light; Neal R Swerdlow; David L Braff
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 3.225

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.