Literature DB >> 16485405

A method to implement full six-degree target shift corrections for rigid body in image-guided radiotherapy.

Ning J Yue1, Jonathan P S Knisely, Haijun Song, Ravinder Nath.   

Abstract

Treatment position setup errors often introduce temporal variations in the position of target relative to the planned external radiation beams. The errors can be introduced by the movement of a target relative to external setup marks or to other relevant landmarks that are used to position a patient for radiotherapy. Those variations can cause dose deviations from the planned doses and result in suboptimal treatments where part of the target is not fully irradiated or a critical structure receives more than desired radiation doses. Clinically available technology for image-guided radiotherapy can detect variations of target position. In this study, a method has been developed to correct for target position variations and restore the original beam geometries relative to the target. The technique involves three matrix transformations: (1) transformation of beams from the machine coordinate system to the patient coordinate system as in the patient geometry in the approved dosimetric plan; (2) transformation of beams from the patient coordinate system in the approved plan to the patient coordinate system that is identified at the time of treatment; (3) transformation of beams from the patient coordinate system at the time of treatment in the treatment patient geometry back to the machine coordinate system. The transformation matrix used for the second transformation is determined through the use of image-guided radiotherapy technology and image registration. By using these matrix transformations, the isocenter shift, the gantry, couch and collimator angles of the beams for the treatment, adjusted for the target shift, can be derived. With the new beam parameters, the beams will possess the same positions and orientations relative to the target as in the plan for a rigid body. This method was applied to a head phantom study, and it was found that the target shift was fully corrected in treatment and excellent agreement was found in target dose coverage between the plan and the treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16485405     DOI: 10.1118/1.2138009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  9 in total

1.  Novel correction methods as alternatives for the six-dimensional correction in CyberKnife treatment.

Authors:  Osamu Suzuki; Hiroya Shiomi; Satoaki Nakamura; Fumitoshi Nakayama; Yasuo Yoshioka; Takehiro Inoue
Journal:  Radiat Med       Date:  2007-01-25

2.  Roll and pitch set-up errors during volumetric modulated arc delivery: can adapting gantry and collimator angles compensate?

Authors:  Nienke A Hoffmans-Holtzer; Daan Hoffmans; Max Dahele; Ben J Slotman; Wilko F A R Verbakel
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2014-11-28       Impact factor: 3.621

3.  Comparison of various online IGRT strategies: The benefits of online treatment plan re-optimization.

Authors:  Derek Schulze; Jian Liang; Di Yan; Tiezhi Zhang
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2008-10-29       Impact factor: 6.280

4.  Correction of patient positioning errors based on in-line cone beam CTs: clinical implementation and first experiences.

Authors:  Christoph Thilmann; Simeon Nill; Thomas Tücking; Angelika Höss; Bernd Hesse; Lars Dietrich; Rolf Bendl; Bernhard Rhein; Peter Häring; Christian Thieke; Uwe Oelfke; Juergen Debus; Peter Huber
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2006-05-24       Impact factor: 3.481

5.  Dosimetric consequences of rotational setup errors with direct simulation in a treatment planning system for fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy.

Authors:  Jean L Peng; Chihray Liu; Yu Chen; Robert J Amdur; Kenneth Vanek; Jonathan G Li
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2011-04-04       Impact factor: 2.102

6.  Dosimetric effects of positioning shifts using 6D-frameless stereotactic Brainlab system in hypofractionated intracranial radiotherapy.

Authors:  Hosang Jin; Vance P Keeling; Imad Ali; Salahuddin Ahmad
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2016-01-08       Impact factor: 2.102

7.  Is Halcyon feasible for single thoracic or lumbar vertebral segment SBRT?

Authors:  Fang Li; Jeonghoon Park; Ron Lalonde; Si Young Jang; Maria Stefania diMayorca; John C Flickinger; Andrew Keller; Mohammed Saiful Huq
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2021-11-29       Impact factor: 2.102

8.  Margin evaluation of translational and rotational set-up errors in intensity modulated radiotherapy for cervical cancer.

Authors:  Xiang Zhang; Guo-Ping Shan; Ji-Ping Liu; Bin-Bing Wang
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2016-02-24

9.  A study of nonuniform CTV to PTV margin expansion incorporating both rotational and translational uncertainties.

Authors:  Junjie Miao; Yingjie Xu; Yuan Tian; Zhiqiang Liu; Jianrong Dai
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2019-12-02       Impact factor: 2.102

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.