Literature DB >> 16484420

Comparison of microvascular permeability measurements, K(trans), determined with conventional steady-state T1-weighted and first-pass T2*-weighted MR imaging methods in gliomas and meningiomas.

S Cha1, L Yang, G Johnson, A Lai, M-H Chen, T Tihan, M Wendland, W P Dillon.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: The widely accepted MR method for quantitating brain tumor microvascular permeability, K(trans), is the steady-state T1-weighted gradient-echo method (ssT1). Recently the first-pass T2*-weighted (fpT2*) method has been used to derive both relative cerebral blood volume (rCBV) and K(trans). We hypothesized that K(trans) derived from the ssT1 and the fpT2* methods will correlate differently in gliomas and meningiomas because of the unique differences in morphologic and functional status of each tumor vascular network.
METHODS: Before surgery, 27 patients with newly diagnosed gliomas (WHO grade I-IV; n = 20) or meningiomas (n = 7) underwent conventional anatomic MR imaging and 12 dynamic ssT1 acquisitions followed by 60 dynamic fpT2* images before and after gadopentate dimeglumine administration. The 3 hemodynamic variables-fpT2* rCBV, fpT2* K(trans), and ssT1 K(trans)-were calculated in anatomically identical locations and correlated with glioma grade. The fpT2* K(trans) values were compared with ssT1 K(trans) for gliomas and meningiomas.
RESULTS: All 3 hemodynamic variables displayed distinct distributions among grades 2, 3, and 4 gliomas by using the Kruskal-Wallis test. Only K(trans) values, and not rCBV, could differentiate between grade 4 and lower-grade gliomas by using the Wilcoxon rank sum test. The fpT2* K(trans) was highly predictive of ssT1 K(trans) for gliomas, with an estimated regression coefficient of 0.49 (P < .001). For meningiomas, however, fpT2* K(trans) values correlated poorly with ssT1 K(trans) values (r = 0.26; P = .74).
CONCLUSION: Compared with rCBV, K(trans) values derived from either ssT1 or fpT2* were more predictive of glioma grade. The fpT2* K(trans) was highly correlated with ssT1 K(trans) in gliomas but not in meningiomas.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16484420      PMCID: PMC8148770     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol        ISSN: 0195-6108            Impact factor:   3.825


  30 in total

1.  Measurement of the blood-brain barrier permeability and leakage space using dynamic MR imaging. 1. Fundamental concepts.

Authors:  P S Tofts; A G Kermode
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 4.668

2.  An oblique cylinder contrast-adjusted (OCCA) phantom to measure the accuracy of MRI brain lesion volume estimation schemes in multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  P S Tofts; G J Barker; M Filippi; M Gawne-Cain; M Lai
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 2.546

3.  Correlation of bFGF, FGFR-1 and VEGF expression with vascularity and malignancy of human astrocytomas.

Authors:  X W Bian; L L Du; J Q Shi; Y S Cheng; F X Liu
Journal:  Anal Quant Cytol Histol       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 0.302

4.  A model of the dual effect of gadopentetate dimeglumine on dynamic brain MR images.

Authors:  E L Barbier; J A den Boer; A R Peters; A R Rozeboom; J Sau; A Bonmartin
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 4.813

5.  Non-invasive methods of assessing angiogenesis and their value in predicting response to treatment in colorectal cancer.

Authors:  M L George; A S Dzik-Jurasz; A R Padhani; G Brown; D M Tait; S A Eccles; R I Swift
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 6.939

6.  Comparative study of methods for determining vascular permeability and blood volume in human gliomas.

Authors:  Judith U Harrer; Geoff J M Parker; Hamied A Haroon; David L Buckley; Karl Embelton; Caleb Roberts; Danielle Balériaux; Alan Jackson
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 4.813

7.  Differentiation of low-grade oligodendrogliomas from low-grade astrocytomas by using quantitative blood-volume measurements derived from dynamic susceptibility contrast-enhanced MR imaging.

Authors:  Soonmee Cha; Tarik Tihan; Forrest Crawford; Nancy J Fischbein; Susan Chang; Andrew Bollen; Sarah J Nelson; Michael Prados; Mitchel S Berger; William P Dillon
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 3.825

8.  Quantification of endothelial permeability, leakage space, and blood volume in brain tumors using combined T1 and T2* contrast-enhanced dynamic MR imaging.

Authors:  X P Zhu; K L Li; I D Kamaly-Asl; D R Checkley; J J Tessier; J C Waterton; A Jackson
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 4.813

9.  Comparison of cerebral blood volume and vascular permeability from dynamic susceptibility contrast-enhanced perfusion MR imaging with glioma grade.

Authors:  Meng Law; Stanley Yang; James S Babb; Edmond A Knopp; John G Golfinos; David Zagzag; Glyn Johnson
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 3.825

10.  Measuring blood volume and vascular transfer constant from dynamic, T(2)*-weighted contrast-enhanced MRI.

Authors:  Glyn Johnson; Stephan G Wetzel; Soonmee Cha; James Babb; Paul S Tofts
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 4.668

View more
  48 in total

Review 1.  Permeability imaging in pediatric brain tumors.

Authors:  Sandi Lam; Yimo Lin; Peter C Warnke
Journal:  Transl Pediatr       Date:  2014-07

Review 2.  Theoretical basis of hemodynamic MR imaging techniques to measure cerebral blood volume, cerebral blood flow, and permeability.

Authors:  G Zaharchuk
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2007 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.825

3.  Permeability versus cerebral blood volume measurement in brain tumor evaluation: comparative clinical value and advice to authors.

Authors:  Michael H Lev; Leonardo Vedolin
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 3.825

4.  Correlation of volume transfer coefficient Ktrans with histopathologic grades of gliomas.

Authors:  Na Zhang; Lijuan Zhang; Bensheng Qiu; Li Meng; Xiaoyi Wang; Bob L Hou
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2012-05-11       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 5.  MR imaging of neoplastic central nervous system lesions: review and recommendations for current practice.

Authors:  M Essig; N Anzalone; S E Combs; À Dörfler; S-K Lee; P Picozzi; A Rovira; M Weller; M Law
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2011-10-20       Impact factor: 3.825

6.  Quantitative measurement of blood-brain barrier permeability in human using dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI with fast T1 mapping.

Authors:  Saeid Taheri; Charles Gasparovic; Nadim Jon Shah; Gary A Rosenberg
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2010-12-13       Impact factor: 4.668

7.  High- and low-grade glioma differentiation: the role of percentage signal recovery evaluation in MR dynamic susceptibility contrast imaging.

Authors:  Italo Aprile; Giorgia Giovannelli; Paola Fiaschini; Marco Muti; Anna Kouleridou; Nevia Caputo
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2015-03-12       Impact factor: 3.469

8.  Enhancing fraction in glioma and its relationship to the tumoral vascular microenvironment: A dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging study.

Authors:  S J Mills; C Soh; J P B O'Connor; C J Rose; G Buonaccorsi; S Cheung; S Zhao; G J M Parker; A Jackson
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2009-12-17       Impact factor: 3.825

9.  Intravascular contrast agent T2* relaxivity in brain tissue.

Authors:  Vishal Patil; Jens H Jensen; Glyn Johnson
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2012-12-06       Impact factor: 4.044

10.  Multimodal MRI for ischemic stroke: from acute therapy to preventive strategies.

Authors:  Oh Young Bang
Journal:  J Clin Neurol       Date:  2009-09-30       Impact factor: 3.077

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.