Literature DB >> 23225224

Intravascular contrast agent T2* relaxivity in brain tissue.

Vishal Patil1, Jens H Jensen, Glyn Johnson.   

Abstract

Dynamic susceptibility-weighted contrast-enhanced (DSC) MRI perfusion measurements depend on estimating intravascular contrast agent (CA) concentrations (C) from signal intensity changes in T2*-weighted images after bolus injection. Generally, linearity is assumed between relaxation and C, but previous studies have shown that compartmentalization of CA and secondary magnetic field perturbations generate deviations from linearity. Physical phantoms using bulk blood have been used to empirically determine the relationship between relaxation rate and C in large vessels. However, the relaxivity of CA in the microvasculature is not easily measured since constructing appropriate phantoms is difficult. Instead, theoretical relaxivity models have been developed. In this study, we empirically tested a non-linear expression based on static dephasing regime (SDR) and linear approximation. Signal-time curves in white (WM) and grey matter (GM) were converted to concentration time curves (CTCs) using both expressions. Parameters for both linear and non-linear formulations were adjusted to give a best agreement between cerebral blood volumes (CBV) calculated from WM and arterial CTCs in a group of normal subjects scanned at 3T. Optimized parameters were used to calculate blood volume in WM and GM in healthy subjects scanned at 3T and in meningioma patients scanned at 1.5T. Results from this study showed that a non-linear SDR formulation gave an acceptable functional form for tissue relaxivity, giving reliable CBV estimates at different field strengths and echo times.
Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CBV; DSC; MRI; perfusion; relaxivity; static dephasing

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23225224      PMCID: PMC3672249          DOI: 10.1002/nbm.2876

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  NMR Biomed        ISSN: 0952-3480            Impact factor:   4.044


  32 in total

1.  Strong field behavior of the NMR signal from magnetically heterogeneous tissues.

Authors:  J H Jensen; R Chandra
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 4.668

2.  Determination of the MRI contrast agent concentration time course in vivo following bolus injection: effect of equilibrium transcytolemmal water exchange.

Authors:  C S Landis; X Li; F W Telang; J A Coderre; P L Micca; W D Rooney; L L Latour; G Vétek; I Pályka; C S Springer
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 4.668

3.  On the theoretical basis of perfusion measurements by dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI.

Authors:  V G Kiselev
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 4.668

4.  Assessment of T1 and T2* effects in vivo and ex vivo using iron oxide nanoparticles in steady state--dependence on blood volume and water exchange.

Authors:  Atle Bjørnerud; Lars O Johansson; Karen Briley-Saebø; Håkan K Ahlström
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 4.668

5.  Comparison of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI with WHO tumor grading for gliomas.

Authors:  L Lüdemann; W Grieger; R Wurm; M Budzisch; B Hamm; C Zimmer
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  In vivo measurement of regional cerebral haematocrit using positron emission tomography.

Authors:  A A Lammertsma; D J Brooks; R P Beaney; D R Turton; M J Kensett; J D Heather; J Marshall; T Jones
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  1984-09       Impact factor: 6.200

7.  Glial tumor grading and outcome prediction using dynamic spin-echo MR susceptibility mapping compared with conventional contrast-enhanced MR: confounding effect of elevated rCBV of oligodendrogliomas [corrected].

Authors:  Michael H Lev; Yelda Ozsunar; John W Henson; Amjad A Rasheed; Glenn D Barest; Griffith R Harsh; Markus M Fitzek; E Antonio Chiocca; James D Rabinov; Andrew N Csavoy; Bruce R Rosen; Fred H Hochberg; Pamela W Schaefer; R Gilberto Gonzalez
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 3.825

8.  Measuring the arterial input function with gradient echo sequences.

Authors:  Matthias J P van Osch; Evert-jan P A Vonken; Max A Viergever; Jeroen van der Grond; Chris J G Bakker
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 4.668

9.  Robust quantification of contrast agent (CA) concentration with magnetic field correlation (MFC) imaging.

Authors:  Vishal Patil; Glyn Johnson; Jens H Jensen
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 4.668

10.  Glioma grading: sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values of perfusion MR imaging and proton MR spectroscopic imaging compared with conventional MR imaging.

Authors:  Meng Law; Stanley Yang; Hao Wang; James S Babb; Glyn Johnson; Soonmee Cha; Edmond A Knopp; David Zagzag
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2003 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.825

View more
  1 in total

1.  Bayesian estimation of cerebral perfusion using reduced-contrast-dose dynamic susceptibility contrast perfusion at 3T.

Authors:  K Nael; B Mossadeghi; T Boutelier; W Kubal; E A Krupinski; J Dagher; J P Villablanca
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2014-11-27       Impact factor: 3.825

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.